Re: [Revised document] Crossrelease lockdep

Please let me know your opinions. I'm planning to post next spin if you agree with at least the concept. I omitted many things about e.g. synchronization, set theory and so on, since I don't want it to be too lengthy document, so focused on only essential thingy. Please let me know if you think the

Re: [Revised document] Crossrelease lockdep

On Fri, Aug 19, 2016 at 09:39:59PM +0900, Byungchul Park wrote: > Hello, > > I rewrote the document so that the need of crossrelease feature can be > described logically. I think it's more important than to post specific > implementation. Could you let me know your opinions about this? > > Thanks

[Revised document] Crossrelease lockdep

Hello, I rewrote the document so that the need of crossrelease feature can be described logically. I think it's more important than to post specific implementation. Could you let me know your opinions about this? Thanks, Byungchul ->8- Crossrelease Started by Byungchul Par