On Tue, 28 Jan 2014 10:39:23 +
"Jan Beulich" wrote:
> >>> On 28.01.14 at 03:18, Mukesh Rathor
> >>> wrote:
> > Until now, xen did not expose PSE to pvh guest, but a patch was
> > submitted to xen list to enable bunch of features for a pvh guest.
> > PSE has not been looked into for PVH, so u
On Mon, 27 Jan 2014 22:46:34 -0500
Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 27, 2014 at 06:18:39PM -0800, Mukesh Rathor wrote:
> > Until now, xen did not expose PSE to pvh guest, but a patch was
> > submitted to xen list to enable bunch of features for a pvh guest.
> > PSE has not been
>
> Whi
>>> On 28.01.14 at 03:18, Mukesh Rathor wrote:
> Until now, xen did not expose PSE to pvh guest, but a patch was submitted
> to xen list to enable bunch of features for a pvh guest. PSE has not been
> looked into for PVH, so until we can do that and test it to make sure it
> works, disable the fea
On Mon, Jan 27, 2014 at 06:18:39PM -0800, Mukesh Rathor wrote:
> Until now, xen did not expose PSE to pvh guest, but a patch was submitted
> to xen list to enable bunch of features for a pvh guest. PSE has not been
Which 'patch'?
> looked into for PVH, so until we can do that and test it to make
Until now, xen did not expose PSE to pvh guest, but a patch was submitted
to xen list to enable bunch of features for a pvh guest. PSE has not been
looked into for PVH, so until we can do that and test it to make sure it
works, disable the feature to avoid flood of bugs.
Signed-off-by: Mukesh Rath
5 matches
Mail list logo