On Wed, 2015-06-03 at 09:37 -0500, Suravee Suthikulanit wrote:
> On 5/28/2015 9:38 PM, Mark Salter wrote:
> > On Wed, 2015-05-20 at 17:09 -0500, Suravee Suthikulpanit wrote:
> >> >Fromhttp://www.uefi.org/sites/default/files/resources/ACPI_6.0.pdf,
> >> >section 6.2.17 _CCA states that ARM platforms
On 5/28/2015 9:38 PM, Mark Salter wrote:
On Wed, 2015-05-20 at 17:09 -0500, Suravee Suthikulpanit wrote:
>Fromhttp://www.uefi.org/sites/default/files/resources/ACPI_6.0.pdf,
>section 6.2.17 _CCA states that ARM platforms require ACPI _CCA
>object to be specified for DMA-cabpable devices. Therefo
On Wed, 2015-05-20 at 17:09 -0500, Suravee Suthikulpanit wrote:
> From http://www.uefi.org/sites/default/files/resources/ACPI_6.0.pdf,
> section 6.2.17 _CCA states that ARM platforms require ACPI _CCA
> object to be specified for DMA-cabpable devices. Therefore, this patch
> specifies ACPI_CCA_REQU
>From http://www.uefi.org/sites/default/files/resources/ACPI_6.0.pdf,
section 6.2.17 _CCA states that ARM platforms require ACPI _CCA
object to be specified for DMA-cabpable devices. Therefore, this patch
specifies ACPI_CCA_REQUIRED in arm64 Kconfig.
In addition, to handle the case when _CCA is mi
4 matches
Mail list logo