Re: [V8 PATCH 0/3] Introduce ACPI support for ahci_platform driver

2015-04-24 Thread Suravee Suthikulpanit
On 4/23/15 12:02, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: On Thursday, April 23, 2015 04:32:25 PM Suthikulpanit, Suravee wrote: >Mika/Rafael, > >If there are no other concerns about this patch series, do you think this >ready to be pushed to linux-next tree along with the rest of the ARM64 >ACPI patch

Re: [V8 PATCH 0/3] Introduce ACPI support for ahci_platform driver

2015-04-24 Thread Suravee Suthikulpanit
On 4/23/15 12:02, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: On Thursday, April 23, 2015 04:32:25 PM Suthikulpanit, Suravee wrote: Mika/Rafael, If there are no other concerns about this patch series, do you think this ready to be pushed to linux-next tree along with the rest of the ARM64 ACPI patch series

Re: [V8 PATCH 0/3] Introduce ACPI support for ahci_platform driver

2015-04-23 Thread Rafael J. Wysocki
On Thursday, April 23, 2015 04:32:25 PM Suthikulpanit, Suravee wrote: > Mika/Rafael, > > If there are no other concerns about this patch series, do you think this > ready to be pushed to linux-next tree along with the rest of the ARM64 > ACPI patch series from Linaro? There are concerns

Re: [V8 PATCH 0/3] Introduce ACPI support for ahci_platform driver

2015-04-23 Thread Suthikulpanit, Suravee
Mika/Rafael, If there are no other concerns about this patch series, do you think this ready to be pushed to linux-next tree along with the rest of the ARM64 ACPI patch series from Linaro? Thanks, Suravee On 4/6/15, 10:45, "Suravee Suthikulanit" wrote: >Ping. > >Are there any other concerns

Re: [V8 PATCH 0/3] Introduce ACPI support for ahci_platform driver

2015-04-23 Thread Suthikulpanit, Suravee
Mika/Rafael, If there are no other concerns about this patch series, do you think this ready to be pushed to linux-next tree along with the rest of the ARM64 ACPI patch series from Linaro? Thanks, Suravee On 4/6/15, 10:45, Suravee Suthikulanit suravee.suthikulpa...@amd.com wrote: Ping. Are

Re: [V8 PATCH 0/3] Introduce ACPI support for ahci_platform driver

2015-04-23 Thread Rafael J. Wysocki
On Thursday, April 23, 2015 04:32:25 PM Suthikulpanit, Suravee wrote: Mika/Rafael, If there are no other concerns about this patch series, do you think this ready to be pushed to linux-next tree along with the rest of the ARM64 ACPI patch series from Linaro? There are concerns regarding

Re: [V8 PATCH 0/3] Introduce ACPI support for ahci_platform driver

2015-04-06 Thread Suravee Suthikulanit
Ping. Are there any other concerns for this patch series? Thanks, Suravee On 3/30/2015 4:56 PM, Suravee Suthikulpanit wrote: This patch series introduce ACPI support for AHCI platform driver. Existing ACPI support for AHCI assumes the device controller is a PCI device. Since there is no ACPI

Re: [V8 PATCH 0/3] Introduce ACPI support for ahci_platform driver

2015-04-06 Thread Suravee Suthikulanit
Ping. Are there any other concerns for this patch series? Thanks, Suravee On 3/30/2015 4:56 PM, Suravee Suthikulpanit wrote: This patch series introduce ACPI support for AHCI platform driver. Existing ACPI support for AHCI assumes the device controller is a PCI device. Since there is no ACPI

[V8 PATCH 0/3] Introduce ACPI support for ahci_platform driver

2015-03-30 Thread Suravee Suthikulpanit
This patch series introduce ACPI support for AHCI platform driver. Existing ACPI support for AHCI assumes the device controller is a PCI device. Since there is no ACPI _CID for generic AHCI controller, the driver could not use it for matching devices. Therefore, this patch introduces a mechanism

[V8 PATCH 0/3] Introduce ACPI support for ahci_platform driver

2015-03-30 Thread Suravee Suthikulpanit
This patch series introduce ACPI support for AHCI platform driver. Existing ACPI support for AHCI assumes the device controller is a PCI device. Since there is no ACPI _CID for generic AHCI controller, the driver could not use it for matching devices. Therefore, this patch introduces a mechanism