The original patchset had three patches:
1. Renames all functions and macros
2. Moves the header files from fs/9p to include/net/9p and updates the
C files with the new header locations
3. Moves the C files from fs/9p to net/9p
Unfortunately the three patches were applied as a single one in Eric
On Sun, 15 Jul 2007, Latchesar Ionkov wrote:
>
> I thought that it is not a good idea to keep the v9fs_ prefix for code
> that is in different places (fs/9p and net/9p). If keeping the old
> prefix is more acceptable, I can create a new patch without the
> "v9fs_"->"p9_" renames.
It's fine, I do
On Sun, 15 Jul 2007, Latchesar Ionkov wrote:
I thought that it is not a good idea to keep the v9fs_ prefix for code
that is in different places (fs/9p and net/9p). If keeping the old
prefix is more acceptable, I can create a new patch without the
"v9fs_"->"p9_" renames.
do the code reorg and t
I thought that it is not a good idea to keep the v9fs_ prefix for code
that is in different places (fs/9p and net/9p). If keeping the old
prefix is more acceptable, I can create a new patch without the
"v9fs_"->"p9_" renames.
Thanks,
Lucho
On 7/15/07, Linus Torvalds <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
4 matches
Mail list logo
