On Mon, Jan 31, 2005 at 01:55:59PM -0500, Mike Waychison wrote:
> FWIW, some of the old cobalt boxes had the old south bridge revision
> with a WDT. It managed to do resets/wdt off gpio pin 5 though, and
> there is a patch in Alan's 2.6.10-ac tree that handles it.
The old Cobalts also had a PIC
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Tim Hockin wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 31, 2005 at 08:22:11AM +0100, Emmanuel Fleury wrote:
>
>>Jan 30 00:58:21 hermes vmunix: alim7101_wdt: ALi 1543 South-Bridge does
>>not have the correct revision number (???1001?) - WDT
>>not set
>>
>>What did I do
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Tim Hockin wrote:
On Mon, Jan 31, 2005 at 08:22:11AM +0100, Emmanuel Fleury wrote:
Jan 30 00:58:21 hermes vmunix: alim7101_wdt: ALi 1543 South-Bridge does
not have the correct revision number (???1001?) - WDT
not set
What did I do wrong ?
You
On Mon, Jan 31, 2005 at 01:55:59PM -0500, Mike Waychison wrote:
FWIW, some of the old cobalt boxes had the old south bridge revision
with a WDT. It managed to do resets/wdt off gpio pin 5 though, and
there is a patch in Alan's 2.6.10-ac tree that handles it.
The old Cobalts also had a PIC
On Mon, Jan 31, 2005 at 08:22:11AM +0100, Emmanuel Fleury wrote:
> Jan 30 00:58:21 hermes vmunix: alim7101_wdt: ALi 1543 South-Bridge does
> not have the correct revision number (???1001?) - WDT
> not set
>
> What did I do wrong ?
You used the wrong South Bridge revision. Seriously, older
Hi,
I have a Vaio C1MZX and in the lspci I saw this line:
:00:11.0 Non-VGA unclassified device: ALi Corporation M7101 Power
Management Controller [PMU]
So, I assumed it was a watchdog and I compiled with the option:
CONFIG_ALIM7101_WDT=m
But, when I do: modprobe alim7101_wdt
I get the
6 matches
Mail list logo