On 05/22/2018 12:31 AM, Dongwon Kim wrote:
Still need more time to review the whole code changes
Take your time, I just wanted to make sure that all interested parties
are in the discussion, so we all finally have what we all want, not
a thing covering only my use-cases
but I noticed one
On 05/22/2018 12:31 AM, Dongwon Kim wrote:
Still need more time to review the whole code changes
Take your time, I just wanted to make sure that all interested parties
are in the discussion, so we all finally have what we all want, not
a thing covering only my use-cases
but I noticed one
Still need more time to review the whole code changes but I noticed one thing.
We've been using the term "hyper_dmabuf" for hypervisor-agnostic linux dmabuf
solution and we are planning to call any of our future solution for other
hypervisors the same name. So having same name for this
Still need more time to review the whole code changes but I noticed one thing.
We've been using the term "hyper_dmabuf" for hypervisor-agnostic linux dmabuf
solution and we are planning to call any of our future solution for other
hypervisors the same name. So having same name for this
From: Oleksandr Andrushchenko
Signed-off-by: Oleksandr Andrushchenko
---
drivers/xen/gntdev.c | 954 +-
include/uapi/xen/gntdev.h | 101
include/xen/gntdev_exp.h | 23 +
3 files
From: Oleksandr Andrushchenko
Signed-off-by: Oleksandr Andrushchenko
---
drivers/xen/gntdev.c | 954 +-
include/uapi/xen/gntdev.h | 101
include/xen/gntdev_exp.h | 23 +
3 files changed, 1066 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
create mode 100644
6 matches
Mail list logo