On Tue, Feb 11 2014, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote:
> On February 11, 2014 4:44:42 PM EST, Jens Axboe wrote:
> >On 2014-02-11 13:21, Sander Eikelenboom wrote:
> >>
> >> Tuesday, February 11, 2014, 7:21:56 PM, you wrote:
> >>
> >>> On 11/02/14 18:15, Roger Pau Monné wrote:
> On 11/02/14 18:52, D
On February 11, 2014 4:44:42 PM EST, Jens Axboe wrote:
>On 2014-02-11 13:21, Sander Eikelenboom wrote:
>>
>> Tuesday, February 11, 2014, 7:21:56 PM, you wrote:
>>
>>> On 11/02/14 18:15, Roger Pau Monné wrote:
On 11/02/14 18:52, David Vrabel wrote:
>
That would mean that unmap_purged_
On 2014-02-11 13:21, Sander Eikelenboom wrote:
Tuesday, February 11, 2014, 7:21:56 PM, you wrote:
On 11/02/14 18:15, Roger Pau Monné wrote:
On 11/02/14 18:52, David Vrabel wrote:
That would mean that unmap_purged_grants would no longer be static and
I should also add a prototype for it in
Tuesday, February 11, 2014, 7:21:56 PM, you wrote:
> On 11/02/14 18:15, Roger Pau Monné wrote:
>> On 11/02/14 18:52, David Vrabel wrote:
>>>
>> That would mean that unmap_purged_grants would no longer be static and
>> I should also add a prototype for it in blkback/common.h, which is kind
>> o
On 11/02/14 18:15, Roger Pau Monné wrote:
> On 11/02/14 18:52, David Vrabel wrote:
>>
> That would mean that unmap_purged_grants would no longer be static and
> I should also add a prototype for it in blkback/common.h, which is kind
> of ugly IMHO.
But less ugly than initializing work with a NU
On 11/02/14 18:52, David Vrabel wrote:
> On 11/02/14 17:40, Roger Pau Monné wrote:
>> On 11/02/14 17:07, Sander Eikelenboom wrote:
>>>
>>> Tuesday, February 11, 2014, 4:56:50 PM, you wrote:
>>>
On Tue, Feb 11, 2014 at 04:52:15PM +0100, Sander Eikelenboom wrote:
> Hi Konrad,
>
> Tod
On 11/02/14 17:40, Roger Pau Monné wrote:
> On 11/02/14 17:07, Sander Eikelenboom wrote:
>>
>> Tuesday, February 11, 2014, 4:56:50 PM, you wrote:
>>
>>> On Tue, Feb 11, 2014 at 04:52:15PM +0100, Sander Eikelenboom wrote:
Hi Konrad,
Today decided to tryout another kernel RC and your p
On 11/02/14 17:07, Sander Eikelenboom wrote:
>
> Tuesday, February 11, 2014, 4:56:50 PM, you wrote:
>
>> On Tue, Feb 11, 2014 at 04:52:15PM +0100, Sander Eikelenboom wrote:
>>> Hi Konrad,
>>>
>>> Today decided to tryout another kernel RC and your pull request to Jens on
>>> top of it .. and I en
On Tue, Feb 11, 2014 at 04:52:15PM +0100, Sander Eikelenboom wrote:
> Hi Konrad,
>
> Today decided to tryout another kernel RC and your pull request to Jens on
> top of it .. and I encoutered this one:
Thank you for testing!
Could you provide the .config file please?
Did you see this _before_
Hi Konrad,
Today decided to tryout another kernel RC and your pull request to Jens on top
of it .. and I encoutered this one:
[ 438.029756] INFO: trying to register non-static key.
[ 438.029759] the code is fine but needs lockdep annotation.
[ 438.029760] turning off the locking correctness
10 matches
Mail list logo