Hi Christoph,
On 08/03/2019 15:23, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
On Tue, Mar 05, 2019 at 09:41:46AM +, Julien Grall wrote:
On Xen, dma_addr_t will always be 64-bit while the phys_addr_t will depend
on the MMU type. So we may have phys_addr_t smaller than dma_addr_t from
the kernel point of view.
On Tue, Mar 05, 2019 at 09:41:46AM +, Julien Grall wrote:
> On Xen, dma_addr_t will always be 64-bit while the phys_addr_t will depend
> on the MMU type. So we may have phys_addr_t smaller than dma_addr_t from
> the kernel point of view.
How can dma_addr_t on arm have value > 32-bit when phy
Hi Arnd,
On 3/5/19 8:16 AM, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
On Tue, Mar 5, 2019 at 12:56 AM Robin Murphy wrote:
On 2019-03-04 7:59 pm, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
This reverts commit b907e20508d0 ("swiotlb: remove SWIOTLB_MAP_ERROR"), which
introduced an overflow warning in configurations that have a larger
dm
Hi Robin,
On 3/4/19 11:56 PM, Robin Murphy wrote:
On 2019-03-04 7:59 pm, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
This reverts commit b907e20508d0 ("swiotlb: remove
SWIOTLB_MAP_ERROR"), which
introduced an overflow warning in configurations that have a larger
dma_addr_t than phys_addr_t:
In file included from in
4 matches
Mail list logo
