On Tue, 2013-02-19 at 18:06 +, David Miller wrote:
> From: Ian Campbell
> Date: Tue, 19 Feb 2013 08:58:44 +
>
> > On Tue, 2013-02-19 at 08:03 +, Jan Beulich wrote:
> >> >>> On 19.02.13 at 06:53, David Miller wrote:
> >> > From: Andrew Jones
> >> > Date: Mon, 18 Feb 2013 21:29:20 +01
From: Ian Campbell
Date: Tue, 19 Feb 2013 08:58:44 +
> On Tue, 2013-02-19 at 08:03 +, Jan Beulich wrote:
>> >>> On 19.02.13 at 06:53, David Miller wrote:
>> > From: Andrew Jones
>> > Date: Mon, 18 Feb 2013 21:29:20 +0100
>> >
>> >> netbk_fatal_tx_err() calls xenvif_carrier_off(), which
On Tue, 2013-02-19 at 08:03 +, Jan Beulich wrote:
> The core of
> it is that the put here parallels the one in netbk_tx_err(), and
> the one in xenvif_carrier_off() matches the get from
> xenvif_connect() (which normally would be done on the path
> coming through xenvif_disconnect()).
A few p
On Tue, 2013-02-19 at 08:03 +, Jan Beulich wrote:
> >>> On 19.02.13 at 06:53, David Miller wrote:
> > From: Andrew Jones
> > Date: Mon, 18 Feb 2013 21:29:20 +0100
> >
> >> netbk_fatal_tx_err() calls xenvif_carrier_off(), which does
> >> a xenvif_put(). As callers of netbk_fatal_tx_err should
On Tue, 19 Feb 2013 08:03:49 +
"Jan Beulich" wrote:
> >>> On 19.02.13 at 06:53, David Miller wrote:
> > From: Andrew Jones
> > Date: Mon, 18 Feb 2013 21:29:20 +0100
> >
> >> netbk_fatal_tx_err() calls xenvif_carrier_off(), which does
> >> a xenvif_put(). As callers of netbk_fatal_tx_err sh
>>> On 19.02.13 at 06:53, David Miller wrote:
> From: Andrew Jones
> Date: Mon, 18 Feb 2013 21:29:20 +0100
>
>> netbk_fatal_tx_err() calls xenvif_carrier_off(), which does
>> a xenvif_put(). As callers of netbk_fatal_tx_err should only
>> have one reference to the vif at this time, then the xenv
6 matches
Mail list logo
