On Thu, Jul 07, 2016 at 09:57:10AM -0600, Jan Beulich wrote:
> >>> On 07.07.16 at 17:37, wrote:
> > On Thu, Jul 07, 2016 at 10:52:18AM +0100, Andrew Cooper wrote:
> >> On 07/07/16 10:45, Roger Pau Monne wrote:
> >> > On Thu, Jul 07, 2016 at 01:38:58AM -0600, Jan Beulich wrote:
> >> >> The function
>>> On 07.07.16 at 17:37, wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 07, 2016 at 10:52:18AM +0100, Andrew Cooper wrote:
>> On 07/07/16 10:45, Roger Pau Monne wrote:
>> > On Thu, Jul 07, 2016 at 01:38:58AM -0600, Jan Beulich wrote:
>> >> The functions such get passed to have been taking pointers to const
>> >> since at
On Thu, Jul 07, 2016 at 10:52:18AM +0100, Andrew Cooper wrote:
> On 07/07/16 10:45, Roger Pau Monne wrote:
> > On Thu, Jul 07, 2016 at 01:38:58AM -0600, Jan Beulich wrote:
> >> The functions such get passed to have been taking pointers to const
> >> since at least 2.6.16.
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: J
On 07/07/16 10:45, Roger Pau Monne wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 07, 2016 at 01:38:58AM -0600, Jan Beulich wrote:
>> The functions such get passed to have been taking pointers to const
>> since at least 2.6.16.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Jan Beulich
> Acked-by: Roger Pau Monné
>
> Although the wording in the co
4 matches
Mail list logo