On Fri, 27 Jul 2012, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 27, 2012 at 11:49:02AM +0100, Stefano Stabellini wrote:
> > On Thu, 26 Jul 2012, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote:
> > > instead of a big memblock_reserve. This way we can be more
> > > selective in freeing regions (and it also makes it
On Fri, 27 Jul 2012, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote:
On Fri, Jul 27, 2012 at 11:49:02AM +0100, Stefano Stabellini wrote:
On Thu, 26 Jul 2012, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote:
instead of a big memblock_reserve. This way we can be more
selective in freeing regions (and it also makes it easier
On Fri, Jul 27, 2012 at 11:49:02AM +0100, Stefano Stabellini wrote:
> On Thu, 26 Jul 2012, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote:
> > instead of a big memblock_reserve. This way we can be more
> > selective in freeing regions (and it also makes it easier
> > to understand where is what).
> >
> > [v1: Move
On Fri, Jul 27, 2012 at 11:49:02AM +0100, Stefano Stabellini wrote:
On Thu, 26 Jul 2012, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote:
instead of a big memblock_reserve. This way we can be more
selective in freeing regions (and it also makes it easier
to understand where is what).
[v1: Move the
4 matches
Mail list logo