Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH linux v2 0/9] xen: pvhvm: support bootup on secondary vCPUs

Stefano Stabellini writes: > On Mon, 25 Jul 2016, Vitaly Kuznetsov wrote: >> >> While we're not obliged to have the same type for xen_vcpu_id on all >> arches I see no point in diverging without a reason. I can do v3 making >> the mapping uint32 > > I agree that making

Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH linux v2 0/9] xen: pvhvm: support bootup on secondary vCPUs

Stefano Stabellini writes: > On Mon, 25 Jul 2016, Vitaly Kuznetsov wrote: >> >> While we're not obliged to have the same type for xen_vcpu_id on all >> arches I see no point in diverging without a reason. I can do v3 making >> the mapping uint32 > > I agree that making the mapping uint32_t

Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH linux v2 0/9] xen: pvhvm: support bootup on secondary vCPUs

On Mon, 25 Jul 2016, Julien Grall wrote: > On 25/07/16 14:39, Vitaly Kuznetsov wrote: > > Julien Grall writes: > > > > > Hi David, > > > > > > On 25/07/16 13:38, David Vrabel wrote: > > > > On 30/06/16 16:56, Vitaly Kuznetsov wrote: > > > > > It may happen that Xen's and

Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH linux v2 0/9] xen: pvhvm: support bootup on secondary vCPUs

On Mon, 25 Jul 2016, Julien Grall wrote: > On 25/07/16 14:39, Vitaly Kuznetsov wrote: > > Julien Grall writes: > > > > > Hi David, > > > > > > On 25/07/16 13:38, David Vrabel wrote: > > > > On 30/06/16 16:56, Vitaly Kuznetsov wrote: > > > > > It may happen that Xen's and Linux's ideas of vCPU

Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH linux v2 0/9] xen: pvhvm: support bootup on secondary vCPUs

On Mon, 25 Jul 2016, David Vrabel wrote: > On 25/07/16 14:17, Julien Grall wrote: > > Hi David, > > > > On 25/07/16 13:38, David Vrabel wrote: > >> On 30/06/16 16:56, Vitaly Kuznetsov wrote: > >>> It may happen that Xen's and Linux's ideas of vCPU id diverge. In > >>> particular, when we crash on

Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH linux v2 0/9] xen: pvhvm: support bootup on secondary vCPUs

On Mon, 25 Jul 2016, David Vrabel wrote: > On 25/07/16 14:17, Julien Grall wrote: > > Hi David, > > > > On 25/07/16 13:38, David Vrabel wrote: > >> On 30/06/16 16:56, Vitaly Kuznetsov wrote: > >>> It may happen that Xen's and Linux's ideas of vCPU id diverge. In > >>> particular, when we crash on

Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH linux v2 0/9] xen: pvhvm: support bootup on secondary vCPUs

On Mon, 25 Jul 2016, Vitaly Kuznetsov wrote: > Julien Grall writes: > > > Hello, > > > > On 25/07/16 14:39, Vitaly Kuznetsov wrote: > >> Julien Grall writes: > >> > >>> Hi David, > >>> > >>> On 25/07/16 13:38, David Vrabel wrote: > On 30/06/16

Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH linux v2 0/9] xen: pvhvm: support bootup on secondary vCPUs

On Mon, 25 Jul 2016, Vitaly Kuznetsov wrote: > Julien Grall writes: > > > Hello, > > > > On 25/07/16 14:39, Vitaly Kuznetsov wrote: > >> Julien Grall writes: > >> > >>> Hi David, > >>> > >>> On 25/07/16 13:38, David Vrabel wrote: > On 30/06/16 16:56, Vitaly Kuznetsov wrote: > > It may

Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH linux v2 0/9] xen: pvhvm: support bootup on secondary vCPUs

Julien Grall writes: > Hello, > > On 25/07/16 14:39, Vitaly Kuznetsov wrote: >> Julien Grall writes: >> >>> Hi David, >>> >>> On 25/07/16 13:38, David Vrabel wrote: On 30/06/16 16:56, Vitaly Kuznetsov wrote: > It may happen that Xen's and

Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH linux v2 0/9] xen: pvhvm: support bootup on secondary vCPUs

Julien Grall writes: > Hello, > > On 25/07/16 14:39, Vitaly Kuznetsov wrote: >> Julien Grall writes: >> >>> Hi David, >>> >>> On 25/07/16 13:38, David Vrabel wrote: On 30/06/16 16:56, Vitaly Kuznetsov wrote: > It may happen that Xen's and Linux's ideas of vCPU id diverge. In >

Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH linux v2 0/9] xen: pvhvm: support bootup on secondary vCPUs

On 25/07/16 15:01, Julien Grall wrote: > Hello, > > On 25/07/16 14:39, Vitaly Kuznetsov wrote: >> Julien Grall writes: >> >>> Hi David, >>> >>> On 25/07/16 13:38, David Vrabel wrote: On 30/06/16 16:56, Vitaly Kuznetsov wrote: > It may happen that Xen's and Linux's

Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH linux v2 0/9] xen: pvhvm: support bootup on secondary vCPUs

On 25/07/16 15:01, Julien Grall wrote: > Hello, > > On 25/07/16 14:39, Vitaly Kuznetsov wrote: >> Julien Grall writes: >> >>> Hi David, >>> >>> On 25/07/16 13:38, David Vrabel wrote: On 30/06/16 16:56, Vitaly Kuznetsov wrote: > It may happen that Xen's and Linux's ideas of vCPU id

Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH linux v2 0/9] xen: pvhvm: support bootup on secondary vCPUs

Hello, On 25/07/16 14:39, Vitaly Kuznetsov wrote: Julien Grall writes: Hi David, On 25/07/16 13:38, David Vrabel wrote: On 30/06/16 16:56, Vitaly Kuznetsov wrote: It may happen that Xen's and Linux's ideas of vCPU id diverge. In particular, when we crash on a

Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH linux v2 0/9] xen: pvhvm: support bootup on secondary vCPUs

Hello, On 25/07/16 14:39, Vitaly Kuznetsov wrote: Julien Grall writes: Hi David, On 25/07/16 13:38, David Vrabel wrote: On 30/06/16 16:56, Vitaly Kuznetsov wrote: It may happen that Xen's and Linux's ideas of vCPU id diverge. In particular, when we crash on a secondary vCPU we may want to

Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH linux v2 0/9] xen: pvhvm: support bootup on secondary vCPUs

On 25/07/16 14:17, Julien Grall wrote: > Hi David, > > On 25/07/16 13:38, David Vrabel wrote: >> On 30/06/16 16:56, Vitaly Kuznetsov wrote: >>> It may happen that Xen's and Linux's ideas of vCPU id diverge. In >>> particular, when we crash on a secondary vCPU we may want to do kdump >>> and

Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH linux v2 0/9] xen: pvhvm: support bootup on secondary vCPUs

On 25/07/16 14:17, Julien Grall wrote: > Hi David, > > On 25/07/16 13:38, David Vrabel wrote: >> On 30/06/16 16:56, Vitaly Kuznetsov wrote: >>> It may happen that Xen's and Linux's ideas of vCPU id diverge. In >>> particular, when we crash on a secondary vCPU we may want to do kdump >>> and

Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH linux v2 0/9] xen: pvhvm: support bootup on secondary vCPUs

Julien Grall writes: > Hi David, > > On 25/07/16 13:38, David Vrabel wrote: >> On 30/06/16 16:56, Vitaly Kuznetsov wrote: >>> It may happen that Xen's and Linux's ideas of vCPU id diverge. In >>> particular, when we crash on a secondary vCPU we may want to do kdump >>> and

Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH linux v2 0/9] xen: pvhvm: support bootup on secondary vCPUs

Julien Grall writes: > Hi David, > > On 25/07/16 13:38, David Vrabel wrote: >> On 30/06/16 16:56, Vitaly Kuznetsov wrote: >>> It may happen that Xen's and Linux's ideas of vCPU id diverge. In >>> particular, when we crash on a secondary vCPU we may want to do kdump >>> and unlike plain kexec

Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH linux v2 0/9] xen: pvhvm: support bootup on secondary vCPUs

Hi David, On 25/07/16 13:38, David Vrabel wrote: On 30/06/16 16:56, Vitaly Kuznetsov wrote: It may happen that Xen's and Linux's ideas of vCPU id diverge. In particular, when we crash on a secondary vCPU we may want to do kdump and unlike plain kexec where we do migrate_to_reboot_cpu() we try

Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH linux v2 0/9] xen: pvhvm: support bootup on secondary vCPUs

Hi David, On 25/07/16 13:38, David Vrabel wrote: On 30/06/16 16:56, Vitaly Kuznetsov wrote: It may happen that Xen's and Linux's ideas of vCPU id diverge. In particular, when we crash on a secondary vCPU we may want to do kdump and unlike plain kexec where we do migrate_to_reboot_cpu() we try

Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH linux v2 0/9] xen: pvhvm: support bootup on secondary vCPUs

On 30/06/16 16:56, Vitaly Kuznetsov wrote: > It may happen that Xen's and Linux's ideas of vCPU id diverge. In > particular, when we crash on a secondary vCPU we may want to do kdump > and unlike plain kexec where we do migrate_to_reboot_cpu() we try booting > on the vCPU which crashed. This

Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH linux v2 0/9] xen: pvhvm: support bootup on secondary vCPUs

On 30/06/16 16:56, Vitaly Kuznetsov wrote: > It may happen that Xen's and Linux's ideas of vCPU id diverge. In > particular, when we crash on a secondary vCPU we may want to do kdump > and unlike plain kexec where we do migrate_to_reboot_cpu() we try booting > on the vCPU which crashed. This