Re: [Xen-devel] [RFC v1 0/8] x86/init: Linux linker tables

2016-01-21 Thread Luis R. Rodriguez
On Thu, Jan 21, 2016 at 03:56:35PM -0800, H. Peter Anvin wrote: > On 01/21/16 14:25, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote: > > On Thu, Jan 21, 2016 at 1:37 PM, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk > > wrote: > >>> Sure, do we know if that ICC compatible? Do we care? There are a > >>> series of ICC hacks put in place on

Re: [Xen-devel] [RFC v1 0/8] x86/init: Linux linker tables

2016-01-21 Thread H. Peter Anvin
On 01/21/16 14:25, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote: > On Thu, Jan 21, 2016 at 1:37 PM, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk > wrote: >>> Sure, do we know if that ICC compatible? Do we care? There are a >>> series of ICC hacks put in place on ipxe's original solution which >>> I've folded in, it seems that works but if

Re: [Xen-devel] [RFC v1 0/8] x86/init: Linux linker tables

2016-01-21 Thread Luis R. Rodriguez
On Thu, Jan 21, 2016 at 1:37 PM, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote: >> Sure, do we know if that ICC compatible? Do we care? There are a >> series of ICC hacks put in place on ipxe's original solution which >> I've folded in, it seems that works but if we care about ICC those >> folks should perhaps

Re: [Xen-devel] [RFC v1 0/8] x86/init: Linux linker tables

2016-01-21 Thread H. Peter Anvin
On 01/21/16 14:25, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote: > On Thu, Jan 21, 2016 at 1:37 PM, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk > wrote: >>> Sure, do we know if that ICC compatible? Do we care? There are a >>> series of ICC hacks put in place on ipxe's original solution which >>> I've folded in, it

Re: [Xen-devel] [RFC v1 0/8] x86/init: Linux linker tables

2016-01-21 Thread Luis R. Rodriguez
On Thu, Jan 21, 2016 at 1:37 PM, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote: >> Sure, do we know if that ICC compatible? Do we care? There are a >> series of ICC hacks put in place on ipxe's original solution which >> I've folded in, it seems that works but if we care about ICC those >>

Re: [Xen-devel] [RFC v1 0/8] x86/init: Linux linker tables

2016-01-21 Thread Luis R. Rodriguez
On Thu, Jan 21, 2016 at 03:56:35PM -0800, H. Peter Anvin wrote: > On 01/21/16 14:25, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote: > > On Thu, Jan 21, 2016 at 1:37 PM, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk > > wrote: > >>> Sure, do we know if that ICC compatible? Do we care? There are a > >>> series of ICC