On Mon, Feb 28, 2005 at 05:16:35PM -0800, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> I assume you mean 2.6.11-rc5, not 2.6.5-rc11.
Indeed sorry, I've probably typed that 2.6.5 number too many times ;)
> As you say, for pipes, none. It only matters on sockets that can have
> urgent data (aka oob - out-of-band
On Tue, 1 Mar 2005, Andrea Arcangeli wrote:
>
> I tend to agree that previously it was working by luck, and I suspect
> it's still working by luck in openbsd too, since openbsd seem to do very
> similar to what linux was doing in 2.6.5-rc11 (and 2.6.5-rc11 made a lot
> more sense than 2.6.9 and
Just a short update since I got feedback on the twisted side. The "r and
w" check that twisted does seems really correct and in sync with current
BK: POLLERR will make both of these bitmask trigger and this should lead
to the "r and w" condition being True.
#define POLLIN_SET (POLLRDNORM |
Just a short update since I got feedback on the twisted side. The r and
w check that twisted does seems really correct and in sync with current
BK: POLLERR will make both of these bitmask trigger and this should lead
to the r and w condition being True.
#define POLLIN_SET (POLLRDNORM | POLLRDBAND
On Tue, 1 Mar 2005, Andrea Arcangeli wrote:
I tend to agree that previously it was working by luck, and I suspect
it's still working by luck in openbsd too, since openbsd seem to do very
similar to what linux was doing in 2.6.5-rc11 (and 2.6.5-rc11 made a lot
more sense than 2.6.9 and
On Mon, Feb 28, 2005 at 05:16:35PM -0800, Linus Torvalds wrote:
I assume you mean 2.6.11-rc5, not 2.6.5-rc11.
Indeed sorry, I've probably typed that 2.6.5 number too many times ;)
As you say, for pipes, none. It only matters on sockets that can have
urgent data (aka oob - out-of-band data).
6 matches
Mail list logo
