On Thu, Apr 07, 2005 at 02:00:07PM +0100, Dave Airlie wrote:
> > My lattest runs were with 2 days old FC development (a.k.a. "bleeding edge")
> > environment with xorg-11-** of same age. Then I noticed that these DRM
> > patches didn't make it into kernel-smp-2.6.11-1.1226_FC4.i686.rpm,
> > and
On Thu, Apr 07, 2005 at 02:00:07PM +0100, Dave Airlie wrote:
My lattest runs were with 2 days old FC development (a.k.a. bleeding edge)
environment with xorg-11-** of same age. Then I noticed that these DRM
patches didn't make it into kernel-smp-2.6.11-1.1226_FC4.i686.rpm,
and I made
>
> My lattest runs were with 2 days old FC development (a.k.a. "bleeding edge")
> environment with xorg-11-** of same age. Then I noticed that these DRM
> patches didn't make it into kernel-smp-2.6.11-1.1226_FC4.i686.rpm,
> and I made 2.6.12-rc2 -- just in case it had fixed the problem...
>
On Thu, Apr 07, 2005 at 01:38:52PM +0100, Dave Airlie wrote:
> > I tried 2.6.12-rc2 which includes this patch, and I get DRM failures
> > here, which causes application and X to hang. (I got failures with 2.6.11
> > also.)
>
> Does the FC-4 test kernel work? There was a bug in X6.8.2 but I think
>
> I tried 2.6.12-rc2 which includes this patch, and I get DRM failures
> here, which causes application and X to hang. (I got failures with 2.6.11
> also.)
Does the FC-4 test kernel work? There was a bug in X6.8.2 but I think it
would be fixed in FC-4 test.. I run Xorg CVS on a 9200 with the
Dropping Linus off this list...
On Mon, Mar 28, 2005 at 12:40:16PM +0100, Dave Airlie wrote:
> Hi Linus,
>
> In order to stop someone loading a drm driver on a wrong core this patch
> makes the driver pass in the version is was built against, this mainly
> useful for people using the DRI
Dropping Linus off this list...
On Mon, Mar 28, 2005 at 12:40:16PM +0100, Dave Airlie wrote:
Hi Linus,
In order to stop someone loading a drm driver on a wrong core this patch
makes the driver pass in the version is was built against, this mainly
useful for people using the DRI snapshots
I tried 2.6.12-rc2 which includes this patch, and I get DRM failures
here, which causes application and X to hang. (I got failures with 2.6.11
also.)
Does the FC-4 test kernel work? There was a bug in X6.8.2 but I think it
would be fixed in FC-4 test.. I run Xorg CVS on a 9200 with the
On Thu, Apr 07, 2005 at 01:38:52PM +0100, Dave Airlie wrote:
I tried 2.6.12-rc2 which includes this patch, and I get DRM failures
here, which causes application and X to hang. (I got failures with 2.6.11
also.)
Does the FC-4 test kernel work? There was a bug in X6.8.2 but I think it
My lattest runs were with 2 days old FC development (a.k.a. bleeding edge)
environment with xorg-11-** of same age. Then I noticed that these DRM
patches didn't make it into kernel-smp-2.6.11-1.1226_FC4.i686.rpm,
and I made 2.6.12-rc2 -- just in case it had fixed the problem...
well
Hi Linus,
In order to stop someone loading a drm driver on a wrong core this patch
makes the driver pass in the version is was built against, this mainly
useful for people using the DRI snapshots for cards that aren't their
normal cards...
Also for anyone who maintains a kernel for distros or
Hi Linus,
In order to stop someone loading a drm driver on a wrong core this patch
makes the driver pass in the version is was built against, this mainly
useful for people using the DRI snapshots for cards that aren't their
normal cards...
Also for anyone who maintains a kernel for distros or
12 matches
Mail list logo
