On Fri, Jul 12, 2019 at 10:37 AM Krzesimir Nowak wrote:
>
> On Fri, Jul 12, 2019 at 2:38 AM Andrii Nakryiko
> wrote:
> >
> > On Mon, Jul 8, 2019 at 3:42 PM Krzesimir Nowak wrote:
> > >
> > > The tests check if ctx and data are correctly prepared from ctx_in and
> > > data_in, so accessing the ct
On Fri, Jul 12, 2019 at 2:38 AM Andrii Nakryiko
wrote:
>
> On Mon, Jul 8, 2019 at 3:42 PM Krzesimir Nowak wrote:
> >
> > The tests check if ctx and data are correctly prepared from ctx_in and
> > data_in, so accessing the ctx and using the bpf_perf_prog_read_value
> > work as expected.
> >
>
> Th
On Mon, Jul 8, 2019 at 3:42 PM Krzesimir Nowak wrote:
>
> The tests check if ctx and data are correctly prepared from ctx_in and
> data_in, so accessing the ctx and using the bpf_perf_prog_read_value
> work as expected.
>
These are x86_64-specific tests, aren't they? Should probably guard
them be
The tests check if ctx and data are correctly prepared from ctx_in and
data_in, so accessing the ctx and using the bpf_perf_prog_read_value
work as expected.
Signed-off-by: Krzesimir Nowak
---
tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_verifier.c | 48 ++
.../selftests/bpf/verifier/perf_event_ru
4 matches
Mail list logo