On Tue, 2013-06-11 at 21:15 -0700, Joe Perches wrote:
> > typedef struct ctl_table ctl_table; (include/linux/sysctl.h)
> > is not correctly picked up by checkpatch.
>
> checkpatch isn't a c compiler.
> It assumes any _t is a typedef.
>
> > So, I assume this actually is a false positive.
>
>
ernel@vger.kernel.org" ;
> > >"linux...@kvack.org"
> > >Sent: Sunday, 9 June 2013 10:58 PM
> > >Subject: Re: [checkpatch] - Confusion
> > >
> > >
> > >On Mon, Jun 10, 2013 at 11:21 AM, PINTU KUMAR
> > >wrote:
>
Hi Pintu,
On Mon, Jun 10, 2013 at 11:49:00AM -0700, PINTU KUMAR wrote:
> >
> > From: anish singh
> >To: PINTU KUMAR
> >Cc: "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" ;
> >"linux...@kvack.org"
> >Sent: Sunday, 9 Jun
>
> From: anish singh
>To: PINTU KUMAR
>Cc: "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" ;
>"linux...@kvack.org"
>Sent: Sunday, 9 June 2013 10:58 PM
>Subject: Re: [checkpatch] - Confusion
>
>
>On Mon, Jun 10, 2013 at 11:2
On Mon, Jun 10, 2013 at 11:21 AM, PINTU KUMAR wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I wanted to submit my first patch.
> But I have some confusion about the /scripts/checkpatch.pl errors.
>
> After correcting some checkpatch errors, when I run checkpatch.pl, it showed
> me 0 errors.
> But when I create patches are gi
Hi,
I wanted to submit my first patch.
But I have some confusion about the /scripts/checkpatch.pl errors.
After correcting some checkpatch errors, when I run checkpatch.pl, it showed me
0 errors.
But when I create patches are git format-patch, it is showing me 1 error.
If I fix error in patch,
6 matches
Mail list logo