Op Saturday 10 February 2007, schreef Randy Dunlap:
> On Fri, 09 Feb 2007 18:35:51 -0500 Chuck Ebbert wrote:
> > Andrew Morton wrote:
> > > I have an email sitting in my drafts folder stating that I'll no longer
> > > accept any features unless they've been publically reviewed in detail
> > > and r
On Fri, 09 Feb 2007 18:35:51 -0500 Chuck Ebbert wrote:
> Andrew Morton wrote:
> > I have an email sitting in my drafts folder stating that I'll no longer
> > accept any features unless they've been publically reviewed in detail and
> > run-time tested by a third party. The idea being to force peo
Andrew Morton wrote:
> I have an email sitting in my drafts folder stating that I'll no longer
> accept any features unless they've been publically reviewed in detail and
> run-time tested by a third party. The idea being to force people to spend
> more time reviewing and testing each other's stuf
On Saturday 10 February 2007 07:30, Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Fri, 09 Feb 2007 14:13:03 +0100
>
> jos poortvliet <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Nick's comment, replying to me some time ago:
>
> I think I was thinking of this:
>
> http://lkml.org/lkml/2006/2/6/509
Fortunately that predates a
On Fri, 09 Feb 2007 14:13:03 +0100
jos poortvliet <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Nick's comment, replying to me some time ago:
I think I was thinking of this:
http://lkml.org/lkml/2006/2/6/509
> Is there
> something fundamentally wrong with the kernel-hackers-culture, or are these
> inc
Op Friday 09 February 2007, schreef Con Kolivas:
> On Saturday 10 February 2007 00:13, jos poortvliet wrote:
> > Nobody has said anything about costs, indeed. Now afaik, swap prefetch is
> > designed to have no/as little as possible costs, so that makes sense.
> > Does it have to have some bugs, wh
On Saturday 10 February 2007 00:13, jos poortvliet wrote:
> > > > Hold.
> > >
> > > Why hold?
> > >
> > > It's been shown this patchset really helps desktop users.
> >
> > Has it? I don't think I've ever observed any benefits from it and I
> > don't think anyone has ever got down and worked out wh
On Saturday 10 February 2007 00:13, jos poortvliet wrote:
> Nobody has said anything about costs, indeed. Now afaik, swap prefetch is
> designed to have no/as little as possible costs, so that makes sense. Does
> it have to have some bugs, which have to be adressed, before it can enter?
> I'm sure
> > > Hold.
> > Why hold?
>
> > It's been shown this patchset really helps desktop users.
>
> Has it? I don't think I've ever observed any benefits from it and I don't
> think anyone has ever got down and worked out what its drawbacks might be,
> and seen if they can be demonstrated in practice.
9 matches
Mail list logo
