Re: [ck] Re: kernel scedular

2007-06-12 Thread Nick Piggin
Martin Steigerwald wrote: Am Sonntag 10 Juni 2007 schrieb Linus Torvalds: Hi Linus! Ehh.. It was tested extensively by lots of people. It was in -mm for a while, and yes, there have been tons of people testing both. I've followed it, and it seems fair to say that yes, Ingo took a lot of ideas

Re: [ck] Re: kernel scedular

2007-06-12 Thread Martin Steigerwald
Am Dienstag 12 Juni 2007 schrieb Martin Steigerwald: > At least in my subjective testing I can't tell any difference anymore, > so it boils down to design criteria, code size, ability to maintain... And of course as needed further - preferably at least somewhat comparable - test scenarios and be

Re: [ck] Re: kernel scedular

2007-06-12 Thread Martin Steigerwald
Am Sonntag 10 Juni 2007 schrieb Linus Torvalds: Hi Linus! > Ehh.. It was tested extensively by lots of people. It was in -mm for a > while, and yes, there have been tons of people testing both. I've > followed it, and it seems fair to say that yes, Ingo took a lot of > ideas from SD, but CFS seem