Re: [ckrm-tech] [PATCH 0/7] containers (V7): Generic Process Containers

2007-02-12 Thread Paul Menage
On 2/12/07, Sam Vilain <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Not every module, you just make them on sensible, planned groupings. The danger is that the "container" group becomes a fallback grouping for things when people can't be bothered thinking about it properly, and everything including the kitchen si

Re: [ckrm-tech] [PATCH 0/7] containers (V7): Generic Process Containers

2007-02-12 Thread Sam Vilain
Paul Menage wrote: >> Ask yourself this - what do you need the container structure for so >> badly, that virtualising the individual resources does not provide for? >> > Primarily, that otherwise every module that wants to affect/monitor > behaviour of a group of associated processes has to im

Re: [ckrm-tech] [PATCH 0/7] containers (V7): Generic Process Containers

2007-02-12 Thread Paul Menage
On 2/12/07, Sam Vilain <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Ask yourself this - what do you need the container structure for so badly, that virtualising the individual resources does not provide for? Primarily, that otherwise every module that wants to affect/monitor behaviour of a group of associated pr