Re: [ckrm-tech] Re: [PATCH] CKRM: 4/10 CKRM: Full rcfs support

2005-02-24 Thread Gerrit Huizenga
On Thu, 24 Feb 2005 17:25:28 CST, Chris Friesen wrote: > Shailabh Nagar wrote: > > > Sounds like a case is being made to make CONFIG_RCFS a "y" and eliminate > > the possibility of it being a loadable module ? > > No, I believe the idea was to make CONFIG_RCFS be automatically set to > the same

Re: [ckrm-tech] Re: [PATCH] CKRM: 4/10 CKRM: Full rcfs support

2005-02-24 Thread Chris Friesen
Shailabh Nagar wrote: Sounds like a case is being made to make CONFIG_RCFS a "y" and eliminate the possibility of it being a loadable module ? No, I believe the idea was to make CONFIG_RCFS be automatically set to the same as CKRM. Chris - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe

Re: [ckrm-tech] Re: [PATCH] CKRM: 4/10 CKRM: Full rcfs support

2005-02-24 Thread Shailabh Nagar
Greg KH wrote: +config RCFS_FS + tristate "Resource Class File System (User API)" + depends on CKRM + help + RCFS is the filesystem API for CKRM. This separate configuration + option is provided only for debugging and will eventually disappear + since rcfs will be automounted whenever CKRM