Re: [discuss] [PATCH] spelling fixes: arch/x86_64/

2007-05-13 Thread James Cloos
> "Alan" == Alan Cox <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Alan> Re-enable is definitely "more correct". I don't disagree. Had I been more awake I expect I'd've :^) made that more clear. -JimC -- James Cloos <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> OpenPGP: 1024D/ED7DAEA6 - To unsubscribe from this list: send th

Re: [discuss] [PATCH] spelling fixes: arch/x86_64/

2007-05-13 Thread Alan Cox
> Essentially all commonly used English words which start out with hyphens > loose them over time. It starts out with typos and progresses until the > non-hyphenated form becomes the exclusively used form. It does seem that > re-enable → reenable is occurring, based on those search hits. Re-enab

Re: [discuss] [PATCH] spelling fixes: arch/x86_64/

2007-05-13 Thread Robert Dewar
James Cloos wrote: "Andi" == Andi Kleen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: - /* Reenable any watchpoints before delivering the + /* Re-enable any watchpoints before delivering the Andi> reenable gets >140k google hits so it seems to be an really Andi> used word. Well y

Re: [discuss] [PATCH] spelling fixes: arch/x86_64/

2007-05-12 Thread James Cloos
> "Andi" == Andi Kleen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> -/* Reenable any watchpoints before delivering the >> +/* Re-enable any watchpoints before delivering the Andi> reenable gets >140k google hits so it seems to be an really Andi> used word. Essentially all commonly

Re: [discuss] [PATCH] spelling fixes: arch/x86_64/

2007-05-12 Thread Andi Kleen
> +++ b/arch/x86_64/kernel/signal.c > @@ -411,7 +411,7 @@ static void do_signal(struct pt_regs *regs) > > signr = get_signal_to_deliver(&info, &ka, regs, NULL); > if (signr > 0) { > - /* Reenable any watchpoints before delivering the > + /* Re-enable any watch