Am Mittwoch, den 02.02.2005, 20:05 -0800 schrieb Matt Mackall:
> Dunno here, seems that having one tool that gave the kernel a key named
> "foo" and then telling dm-crypt to use key "foo" is probably not a bad
> way to go. Then we don't have stuff like "echo | dmsetup create"
> and the like and
On Thu, Feb 03, 2005 at 03:18:20PM +0100, Fruhwirth Clemens wrote:
> Way too complicated. This is a crypto project, why does nobody think of
> crypto to solve the problem :). Here's the idea:
> [see original post, http://lkml.org/lkml/2005/2/3/109 , for idea]
Very simple patch. With that, it's
On Thu, Feb 03, 2005 at 03:18:20PM +0100, Fruhwirth Clemens wrote:
Way too complicated. This is a crypto project, why does nobody think of
crypto to solve the problem :). Here's the idea:
[see original post, http://lkml.org/lkml/2005/2/3/109 , for idea]
Very simple patch. With that, it's
Am Mittwoch, den 02.02.2005, 20:05 -0800 schrieb Matt Mackall:
Dunno here, seems that having one tool that gave the kernel a key named
foo and then telling dm-crypt to use key foo is probably not a bad
way to go. Then we don't have stuff like echo key | dmsetup create
and the like and the
4 matches
Mail list logo
