On Thu, Aug 25, 2016 at 04:24:11AM +, Bart Van Assche wrote:
> On 08/23/16 13:42, Mikko Rapeli wrote:
> > On Tue, Aug 23, 2016 at 02:28:19PM +, Bart Van Assche wrote:
> >> On 08/23/16 06:57, Bart Van Assche wrote:
> >>> On 08/22/16 11:32, Mikko Rapeli wrote:
> - * uint32_t
On Thu, Aug 25, 2016 at 04:24:11AM +, Bart Van Assche wrote:
> On 08/23/16 13:42, Mikko Rapeli wrote:
> > On Tue, Aug 23, 2016 at 02:28:19PM +, Bart Van Assche wrote:
> >> On 08/23/16 06:57, Bart Van Assche wrote:
> >>> On 08/22/16 11:32, Mikko Rapeli wrote:
> - * uint32_t
On 08/23/16 13:42, Mikko Rapeli wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 23, 2016 at 02:28:19PM +, Bart Van Assche wrote:
>> On 08/23/16 06:57, Bart Van Assche wrote:
>>> On 08/22/16 11:32, Mikko Rapeli wrote:
- * uint32_t (*get_region_size)(struct dm_dirty_log *log);
+ * __u32 (*get_region_size)(struct
On 08/23/16 13:42, Mikko Rapeli wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 23, 2016 at 02:28:19PM +, Bart Van Assche wrote:
>> On 08/23/16 06:57, Bart Van Assche wrote:
>>> On 08/22/16 11:32, Mikko Rapeli wrote:
- * uint32_t (*get_region_size)(struct dm_dirty_log *log);
+ * __u32 (*get_region_size)(struct
On Tue, Aug 23, 2016 at 02:28:19PM +, Bart Van Assche wrote:
> On 08/23/16 06:57, Bart Van Assche wrote:
> > On 08/22/16 11:32, Mikko Rapeli wrote:
> >> - * uint32_t (*get_region_size)(struct dm_dirty_log *log);
> >> + * __u32 (*get_region_size)(struct dm_dirty_log *log);
> >
> > uint32_t is a
On Tue, Aug 23, 2016 at 02:28:19PM +, Bart Van Assche wrote:
> On 08/23/16 06:57, Bart Van Assche wrote:
> > On 08/22/16 11:32, Mikko Rapeli wrote:
> >> - * uint32_t (*get_region_size)(struct dm_dirty_log *log);
> >> + * __u32 (*get_region_size)(struct dm_dirty_log *log);
> >
> > uint32_t is a
On 08/23/16 06:57, Bart Van Assche wrote:
> On 08/22/16 11:32, Mikko Rapeli wrote:
>> - * uint32_t (*get_region_size)(struct dm_dirty_log *log);
>> + * __u32 (*get_region_size)(struct dm_dirty_log *log);
>
> uint32_t is a type that is defined by ANSI C but __u32 not. So this
> change looks wrong
On 08/23/16 06:57, Bart Van Assche wrote:
> On 08/22/16 11:32, Mikko Rapeli wrote:
>> - * uint32_t (*get_region_size)(struct dm_dirty_log *log);
>> + * __u32 (*get_region_size)(struct dm_dirty_log *log);
>
> uint32_t is a type that is defined by ANSI C but __u32 not. So this
> change looks wrong
On 08/22/16 11:32, Mikko Rapeli wrote:
> - * uint32_t (*get_region_size)(struct dm_dirty_log *log);
> + * __u32 (*get_region_size)(struct dm_dirty_log *log);
uint32_t is a type that is defined by ANSI C but __u32 not. So this
change looks wrong to me. Would it have been sufficient to add
On 08/22/16 11:32, Mikko Rapeli wrote:
> - * uint32_t (*get_region_size)(struct dm_dirty_log *log);
> + * __u32 (*get_region_size)(struct dm_dirty_log *log);
uint32_t is a type that is defined by ANSI C but __u32 not. So this
change looks wrong to me. Would it have been sufficient to add
10 matches
Mail list logo