On Aug 8, 2012, at 7:04 PM, Alasdair G Kergon wrote:
>
> However, first you need to address the second part of Mikulas's email,
> namely to make the case for these changes rather than making no kernel
> changes and instead stacking the verity target over a linear target.
>
> To put this another
On Aug 8, 2012, at 7:04 PM, Alasdair G Kergon wrote:
However, first you need to address the second part of Mikulas's email,
namely to make the case for these changes rather than making no kernel
changes and instead stacking the verity target over a linear target.
To put this another way,
On Thu, Aug 09, 2012 at 12:40:22AM +, Wesley Miaw wrote:
> Apologies if the version increment is incorrect; I was not sure if the minor
> or patch number should be incremented. I assume the different version number
> is
> what would be used to detect if the data offset option is supported.
On Aug 8, 2012, at 1:31 PM, Milan Broz wrote:
> On 08/08/2012 08:46 PM, Mikulas Patocka wrote:
>
>> The problem with the patch is that it changes interface to the userspace
>> tool. The userspace tool veritysetup already exists in recent cryptsetup
>> package, so we can't change the interface
On Aug 8, 2012, at 1:31 PM, Milan Broz wrote:
On 08/08/2012 08:46 PM, Mikulas Patocka wrote:
The problem with the patch is that it changes interface to the userspace
tool. The userspace tool veritysetup already exists in recent cryptsetup
package, so we can't change the interface - you
On Thu, Aug 09, 2012 at 12:40:22AM +, Wesley Miaw wrote:
Apologies if the version increment is incorrect; I was not sure if the minor
or patch number should be incremented. I assume the different version number
is
what would be used to detect if the data offset option is supported.
6 matches
Mail list logo
