Hi Chao,
On Thu, May 07, 2020 at 02:38:39PM +0800, Chao Yu wrote:
> On 2020/5/7 6:36, Gao Xiang wrote:
> > On Wed, May 06, 2020 at 12:16:13PM -0700, Eric Biggers wrote:
> >> On Wed, May 06, 2020 at 02:47:19PM +0800, Gao Xiang wrote:
> >>> On Wed, May 06, 2020 at 09:58:22AM +0800, Gao Xiang wrote:
On 2020/5/7 6:36, Gao Xiang wrote:
> On Wed, May 06, 2020 at 12:16:13PM -0700, Eric Biggers wrote:
>> On Wed, May 06, 2020 at 02:47:19PM +0800, Gao Xiang wrote:
>>> On Wed, May 06, 2020 at 09:58:22AM +0800, Gao Xiang wrote:
On Tue, May 05, 2020 at 06:24:28PM -0700, Eric Biggers wrote:
>
On 2020/5/6 14:55, Chao Yu wrote:
> On 2020/5/6 9:24, Eric Biggers wrote:
>> On Wed, May 06, 2020 at 08:14:07AM +0800, Gao Xiang wrote:
Actually, I think this is wrong because the fsync can be done via a file
descriptor that was opened to a now-deleted link to the file.
>>>
>>> I'm
On Wed, May 06, 2020 at 12:16:13PM -0700, Eric Biggers wrote:
> On Wed, May 06, 2020 at 02:47:19PM +0800, Gao Xiang wrote:
> > On Wed, May 06, 2020 at 09:58:22AM +0800, Gao Xiang wrote:
> > > On Tue, May 05, 2020 at 06:24:28PM -0700, Eric Biggers wrote:
> > > > On Wed, May 06, 2020 at 08:14:07AM
On Wed, May 06, 2020 at 02:47:19PM +0800, Gao Xiang wrote:
> On Wed, May 06, 2020 at 09:58:22AM +0800, Gao Xiang wrote:
> > On Tue, May 05, 2020 at 06:24:28PM -0700, Eric Biggers wrote:
> > > On Wed, May 06, 2020 at 08:14:07AM +0800, Gao Xiang wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > Actually, I think this is
On 2020/5/6 9:24, Eric Biggers wrote:
> On Wed, May 06, 2020 at 08:14:07AM +0800, Gao Xiang wrote:
>>>
>>> Actually, I think this is wrong because the fsync can be done via a file
>>> descriptor that was opened to a now-deleted link to the file.
>>
>> I'm still confused about this...
>>
>> I don't
On Wed, May 06, 2020 at 09:58:22AM +0800, Gao Xiang wrote:
> On Tue, May 05, 2020 at 06:24:28PM -0700, Eric Biggers wrote:
> > On Wed, May 06, 2020 at 08:14:07AM +0800, Gao Xiang wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Actually, I think this is wrong because the fsync can be done via a file
> > > > descriptor that
On Tue, May 05, 2020 at 06:24:28PM -0700, Eric Biggers wrote:
> On Wed, May 06, 2020 at 08:14:07AM +0800, Gao Xiang wrote:
> > >
> > > Actually, I think this is wrong because the fsync can be done via a file
> > > descriptor that was opened to a now-deleted link to the file.
> >
> > I'm still
On Wed, May 06, 2020 at 08:14:07AM +0800, Gao Xiang wrote:
> >
> > Actually, I think this is wrong because the fsync can be done via a file
> > descriptor that was opened to a now-deleted link to the file.
>
> I'm still confused about this...
>
> I don't know what's wrong with this version from
Hi Eric,
On Tue, May 05, 2020 at 11:19:41AM -0700, Eric Biggers wrote:
> On Tue, May 05, 2020 at 11:13:23AM -0700, Jaegeuk Kim wrote:
...
> >
> > -static int get_parent_ino(struct inode *inode, nid_t *pino)
> > -{
> > - struct dentry *dentry;
> > -
> > - inode = igrab(inode);
> > - dentry
On 05/05, Eric Biggers wrote:
> On Tue, May 05, 2020 at 11:49:32AM -0700, Jaegeuk Kim wrote:
> > How about this?
> >
> > From 2a6b0e53e592854306062a2dc35db2d8f79062f2 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> > From: Jaegeuk Kim
> > Date: Tue, 5 May 2020 11:33:29 -0700
> > Subject: [PATCH] f2fs: find a living
On Tue, May 05, 2020 at 11:49:32AM -0700, Jaegeuk Kim wrote:
> How about this?
>
> From 2a6b0e53e592854306062a2dc35db2d8f79062f2 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> From: Jaegeuk Kim
> Date: Tue, 5 May 2020 11:33:29 -0700
> Subject: [PATCH] f2fs: find a living dentry when finding parent ino
>
> We need
On 05/05, Eric Biggers wrote:
> On Tue, May 05, 2020 at 11:13:23AM -0700, Jaegeuk Kim wrote:
> > On 05/05, Eric Biggers wrote:
> > > On Tue, May 05, 2020 at 08:31:39AM -0700, Jaegeuk Kim wrote:
> > > > We had to grab the inode before retrieving i_ino.
> > > >
> > > > Signed-off-by: Jaegeuk Kim
>
On 05/05, Eric Biggers wrote:
> On Tue, May 05, 2020 at 09:58:47AM -0700, Eric Biggers wrote:
> > On Tue, May 05, 2020 at 08:31:39AM -0700, Jaegeuk Kim wrote:
> > > We had to grab the inode before retrieving i_ino.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Jaegeuk Kim
> > > ---
> > > fs/f2fs/file.c | 8
On Tue, May 05, 2020 at 11:13:23AM -0700, Jaegeuk Kim wrote:
> On 05/05, Eric Biggers wrote:
> > On Tue, May 05, 2020 at 08:31:39AM -0700, Jaegeuk Kim wrote:
> > > We had to grab the inode before retrieving i_ino.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Jaegeuk Kim
> > > ---
> > > fs/f2fs/file.c | 8
On 05/05, Eric Biggers wrote:
> On Tue, May 05, 2020 at 08:31:39AM -0700, Jaegeuk Kim wrote:
> > We had to grab the inode before retrieving i_ino.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Jaegeuk Kim
> > ---
> > fs/f2fs/file.c | 8 +++-
> > 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >
> > diff --git
On Tue, May 05, 2020 at 09:58:47AM -0700, Eric Biggers wrote:
> On Tue, May 05, 2020 at 08:31:39AM -0700, Jaegeuk Kim wrote:
> > We had to grab the inode before retrieving i_ino.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Jaegeuk Kim
> > ---
> > fs/f2fs/file.c | 8 +++-
> > 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 1
On Tue, May 05, 2020 at 08:31:39AM -0700, Jaegeuk Kim wrote:
> We had to grab the inode before retrieving i_ino.
>
> Signed-off-by: Jaegeuk Kim
> ---
> fs/f2fs/file.c | 8 +++-
> 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/fs/f2fs/file.c b/fs/f2fs/file.c
> index
18 matches
Mail list logo
