On 02/23, Chao Yu wrote:
> On 2017/2/23 5:15, Jaegeuk Kim wrote:
> > On 02/22, Chao Yu wrote:
> >> On 2017/1/6 10:42, Jaegeuk Kim wrote:
> >>> Hi Chao,
> >>>
> >>> On 01/06, Chao Yu wrote:
> On 2017/1/6 3:46, Jaegeuk Kim wrote:
> > On 01/05, Chao Yu wrote:
> >> On 2017/1/4 17:29, Chao
On 2017/2/23 5:15, Jaegeuk Kim wrote:
> On 02/22, Chao Yu wrote:
>> On 2017/1/6 10:42, Jaegeuk Kim wrote:
>>> Hi Chao,
>>>
>>> On 01/06, Chao Yu wrote:
On 2017/1/6 3:46, Jaegeuk Kim wrote:
> On 01/05, Chao Yu wrote:
>> On 2017/1/4 17:29, Chao Yu wrote:
>>> On 2016/12/31 2:51, Jaege
On 02/22, Chao Yu wrote:
> On 2017/1/6 10:42, Jaegeuk Kim wrote:
> > Hi Chao,
> >
> > On 01/06, Chao Yu wrote:
> >> On 2017/1/6 3:46, Jaegeuk Kim wrote:
> >>> On 01/05, Chao Yu wrote:
> On 2017/1/4 17:29, Chao Yu wrote:
> > On 2016/12/31 2:51, Jaegeuk Kim wrote:
> >> This patch relaxe
On 2017/1/6 10:42, Jaegeuk Kim wrote:
> Hi Chao,
>
> On 01/06, Chao Yu wrote:
>> On 2017/1/6 3:46, Jaegeuk Kim wrote:
>>> On 01/05, Chao Yu wrote:
On 2017/1/4 17:29, Chao Yu wrote:
> On 2016/12/31 2:51, Jaegeuk Kim wrote:
>> This patch relaxes async discard commands to avoid waiting i
Hi Jaegeuk,
On 2017/1/6 10:42, Jaegeuk Kim wrote:
> Hi Chao,
>
> On 01/06, Chao Yu wrote:
>> On 2017/1/6 3:46, Jaegeuk Kim wrote:
>>> On 01/05, Chao Yu wrote:
On 2017/1/4 17:29, Chao Yu wrote:
> On 2016/12/31 2:51, Jaegeuk Kim wrote:
>> This patch relaxes async discard commands to av
Hi Chao,
On 01/06, Chao Yu wrote:
> On 2017/1/6 3:46, Jaegeuk Kim wrote:
> > On 01/05, Chao Yu wrote:
> >> On 2017/1/4 17:29, Chao Yu wrote:
> >>> On 2016/12/31 2:51, Jaegeuk Kim wrote:
> This patch relaxes async discard commands to avoid waiting its end_io
> during
> checkpoint.
>
On 2017/1/6 3:46, Jaegeuk Kim wrote:
> On 01/05, Chao Yu wrote:
>> On 2017/1/4 17:29, Chao Yu wrote:
>>> On 2016/12/31 2:51, Jaegeuk Kim wrote:
This patch relaxes async discard commands to avoid waiting its end_io
during
checkpoint.
Instead of waiting them during checkpoint, it
Hi Chao,
On 01/05, Chao Yu wrote:
> Hi Jaegeuk,
>
> I can see patch named ("f2fs: call f2fs_wait_all_discard_bio for an error
> case")
> was merged in dev-test, but I think it's no needed to change error case
> handling
> like this since f2fs_wait_all_discard_bio should always be called after
>
On 01/05, Chao Yu wrote:
> On 2017/1/4 17:29, Chao Yu wrote:
> > On 2016/12/31 2:51, Jaegeuk Kim wrote:
> >> This patch relaxes async discard commands to avoid waiting its end_io
> >> during
> >> checkpoint.
> >> Instead of waiting them during checkpoint, it will be done when actually
> >> reusin
Hi Jaegeuk,
I can see patch named ("f2fs: call f2fs_wait_all_discard_bio for an error case")
was merged in dev-test, but I think it's no needed to change error case handling
like this since f2fs_wait_all_discard_bio should always be called after
clear_prefree_segments.
Thanks,
On 2017/1/5 11:19,
On 2017/1/4 17:29, Chao Yu wrote:
> On 2016/12/31 2:51, Jaegeuk Kim wrote:
>> This patch relaxes async discard commands to avoid waiting its end_io during
>> checkpoint.
>> Instead of waiting them during checkpoint, it will be done when actually
>> reusing
>> them.
>>
>> Test on initial partition
On 2016/12/31 2:51, Jaegeuk Kim wrote:
> This patch relaxes async discard commands to avoid waiting its end_io during
> checkpoint.
> Instead of waiting them during checkpoint, it will be done when actually
> reusing
> them.
>
> Test on initial partition of nvme drive.
>
> # time fstrim /mnt/te
12 matches
Mail list logo
