On Tue, Sep 09, 2014 at 04:10:00PM +0800, Chao Yu wrote:
> Hi Jaegeuk,
>
> Looks good to me!
>
> One nitpick, how about judging this condition before we lock ->i_mutex to
> avoid unneeded lock contention and invoking of i_size_read()?
Agreed.
>From 0b4c5afde9b57c08b55d26725d228d5314cfc57a Mon
On Tue, Sep 09, 2014 at 04:10:00PM +0800, Chao Yu wrote:
Hi Jaegeuk,
Looks good to me!
One nitpick, how about judging this condition before we lock -i_mutex to
avoid unneeded lock contention and invoking of i_size_read()?
Agreed.
From 0b4c5afde9b57c08b55d26725d228d5314cfc57a Mon Sep 17
09, 2014 12:42 PM
> To: Tommi Rantala
> Cc: Dave Jones; trin...@vger.kernel.org; LKML;
> linux-f2fs-de...@lists.sourceforge.net
> Subject: Re: [f2fs-dev] f2fs get_dnode_of_data oops
>
> Hi Tommi,
>
> This patch should resolve this bug.
> Thanks a lot. :)
>
> >F
To: Tommi Rantala
Cc: Dave Jones; trin...@vger.kernel.org; LKML;
linux-f2fs-de...@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [f2fs-dev] f2fs get_dnode_of_data oops
Hi Tommi,
This patch should resolve this bug.
Thanks a lot. :)
From ee24677b9917583f50f16b6f59771439f91b890c Mon Sep 17 00:00:00
4 matches
Mail list logo