On Fri, Jul 31, 2020 at 3:16 PM Steven Rostedt wrote:
>
> On Fri, 31 Jul 2020 13:33:45 -0600
> dann frazier wrote:
>
> > > This is marked as "Fixes" but is more of a clean up than a true fix.
> > > Backport if you want, but its not critical.
> >
> > Thanks Steven! In case it helps backport consid
On Fri, 31 Jul 2020 13:33:45 -0600
dann frazier wrote:
> > This is marked as "Fixes" but is more of a clean up than a true fix.
> > Backport if you want, but its not critical.
>
> Thanks Steven! In case it helps backport consideration, I wanted to
> note that this addresses an issue we've seen
On Thu, Jul 02, 2020 at 05:58:21PM -0400, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> From: "Steven Rostedt (VMware)"
>
> If a process has the trace_pipe open on a trace_array, the current tracer
> for that trace array should not be changed. This was original enforced by a
> global lock, but when instances were intr
From: "Steven Rostedt (VMware)"
If a process has the trace_pipe open on a trace_array, the current tracer
for that trace array should not be changed. This was original enforced by a
global lock, but when instances were introduced, it was moved to the
current_trace. But this structure is shared by
4 matches
Mail list logo