Re: [for next][PATCH 1/2] mfd: Fix unmet dependency warning for MFD_TPS68470

2019-01-30 Thread Rafael J. Wysocki
On Monday, January 28, 2019 8:21:56 AM CET Lee Jones wrote: > On Thu, 24 Jan 2019, Sinan Kaya wrote: > > > On 1/24/2019 5:51 AM, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > > > Is anyone taking this or should I? > > > > Nobody replied to this yet. I was hoping this series to go through acpi > > tree like the

Re: [for next][PATCH 1/2] mfd: Fix unmet dependency warning for MFD_TPS68470

2019-01-27 Thread Lee Jones
On Thu, 24 Jan 2019, Sinan Kaya wrote: > On 1/24/2019 5:51 AM, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > > Is anyone taking this or should I? > > Nobody replied to this yet. I was hoping this series to go through acpi > tree like the rest of the other fixes. [post-vacation reply] That's not how these things

Re: [for next][PATCH 1/2] mfd: Fix unmet dependency warning for MFD_TPS68470

2019-01-24 Thread Sinan Kaya
On 1/24/2019 5:51 AM, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: Is anyone taking this or should I? Nobody replied to this yet. I was hoping this series to go through acpi tree like the rest of the other fixes.

Re: [for next][PATCH 1/2] mfd: Fix unmet dependency warning for MFD_TPS68470

2019-01-24 Thread Rafael J. Wysocki
On Tuesday, January 22, 2019 12:19:57 AM CET Sinan Kaya wrote: > After 'commit 5d32a66541c4 ("PCI/ACPI: Allow ACPI to be built without > CONFIG_PCI set")' dependencies on CONFIG_PCI that previously were > satisfied implicitly through dependencies on CONFIG_ACPI have to be > specified directly. >

[for next][PATCH 1/2] mfd: Fix unmet dependency warning for MFD_TPS68470

2019-01-21 Thread Sinan Kaya
After 'commit 5d32a66541c4 ("PCI/ACPI: Allow ACPI to be built without CONFIG_PCI set")' dependencies on CONFIG_PCI that previously were satisfied implicitly through dependencies on CONFIG_ACPI have to be specified directly. WARNING: unmet direct dependencies detected for I2C_DESIGNWARE_PLATFORM