Re: [fuse-devel] FS block count, size and seek offset?

2007-06-19 Thread Goswin von Brederlow
"David Brown" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> Why don't you use the existing fuse-unionfs? > > I thought about doing this but it would need to be modified somehow > and even then my users would look to me to fix issues and I don't like > trying to find hard bugs in other peoples code. > > Also, the

Re: [fuse-devel] FS block count, size and seek offset?

2007-06-18 Thread David Brown
Why don't you use the existing fuse-unionfs? I thought about doing this but it would need to be modified somehow and even then my users would look to me to fix issues and I don't like trying to find hard bugs in other peoples code. Also, there's a lot of functionality that funionfs has but I do

Re: [fuse-devel] FS block count, size and seek offset?

2007-06-18 Thread Miklos Szeredi
> P.S. maybe a posix filesystem interface manual would be good? Maybe you are looking for this: http://www.opengroup.org/onlinepubs/009695399/ Miklos - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at

Re: [fuse-devel] FS block count, size and seek offset?

2007-06-18 Thread Goswin von Brederlow
"David Brown" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > I was looking at various file systems and how they return > stat.st_blocks and stat.st_size for directories and had some questions > on how a fuse filesystem is supposed to implement readdir with the > seek offset when trying to union two directories tog