Re: [git] libata-dev queue updated

2005-08-22 Thread Jeff Garzik
Daniel Drake wrote: Hi Jeff, Jeff Garzik wrote: I finally got around to creating something that has been missing since BitKeeper disappeared, and something that Andrew has been wanting from me for a while: an amalgamation of all the libata-dev branches that I maintain internally. You are m

Re: [git] libata-dev queue updated

2005-08-19 Thread Jeff Garzik
Brett Russ wrote: Jeff Garzik wrote: In such cases, patches are divided into branches by category: ncq (NCQ queueing support), chs-support (C/H/S support), adma (new ADMA driver), sil24 (new Silicon Image 312x driver), passthru (ATA passthrough/SMART support), etc. Jeff, The below doesn't s

Re: [git] libata-dev queue updated

2005-08-19 Thread Brett Russ
Jeff Garzik wrote: In such cases, patches are divided into branches by category: ncq (NCQ queueing support), chs-support (C/H/S support), adma (new ADMA driver), sil24 (new Silicon Image 312x driver), passthru (ATA passthrough/SMART support), etc. Jeff, The below doesn't seem to include NCQ.

Re: [git] libata-dev queue updated

2005-08-19 Thread Daniel Drake
Hi Jeff, Jeff Garzik wrote: I finally got around to creating something that has been missing since BitKeeper disappeared, and something that Andrew has been wanting from me for a while: an amalgamation of all the libata-dev branches that I maintain internally. You are missing two sata_promise

[git] libata-dev queue updated

2005-08-18 Thread Jeff Garzik
I finally got around to creating something that has been missing since BitKeeper disappeared, and something that Andrew has been wanting from me for a while: an amalgamation of all the libata-dev branches that I maintain internally. First, a bit of background. Most patches I receive are dumped