Al Viro wrote:
Proposed addition to icside part, provided that ARM folks ACK it - gets
icside to build and AFAICS it's correct:
diff --git a/drivers/ata/pata_icside.c b/drivers/ata/pata_icside.c
index be30923..842fe08 100644
--- a/drivers/ata/pata_icside.c
+++ b/drivers/ata/pata_icside.c
@@ -332
Russell King wrote:
On Wed, Oct 24, 2007 at 08:53:09AM -0400, Jeff Garzik wrote:
Russell King wrote:
On Mon, Oct 15, 2007 at 04:07:47PM -0400, Jeff Garzik wrote:
Russell King wrote:
On Mon, Oct 15, 2007 at 03:54:16PM -0400, Jeff Garzik wrote:
Al Viro wrote:
Proposed addition to icside part,
in my mbox queue to be
> merged upstream.
Looks like it got my ack more than a week ago:
| Date: Tue, 16 Oct 2007 16:55:07 +0100
| From: Russell King <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
| To: Al Viro <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
| Cc: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
| Linus Torval
Russell King wrote:
On Mon, Oct 15, 2007 at 04:07:47PM -0400, Jeff Garzik wrote:
Russell King wrote:
On Mon, Oct 15, 2007 at 03:54:16PM -0400, Jeff Garzik wrote:
Al Viro wrote:
Proposed addition to icside part, provided that ARM folks ACK it - gets
icside to build and AFAICS it's correct:
AC
On Mon, Oct 15, 2007 at 04:07:47PM -0400, Jeff Garzik wrote:
> Russell King wrote:
> >On Mon, Oct 15, 2007 at 03:54:16PM -0400, Jeff Garzik wrote:
> >>Al Viro wrote:
> >>>Proposed addition to icside part, provided that ARM folks ACK it - gets
> >>>icside to build and AFAICS it's correct:
> >>ACK fr
On Sunday 14 October 2007, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
>
> > How's about this patch?
> >
> > [PATCH] ide-pmac: fix pmac_ide_init_hwif_ports()
> >
> > * pmac_ide_init_hwif_ports() can be called by ide_init_hwif_ports()
> > (through ppc_ide_md.ide_init_hwif hook) for non IDE PMAC interfaces.
>
On Sun, Oct 14, 2007 at 01:12:39AM +0100, Al Viro wrote:
> Proposed addition to icside part, provided that ARM folks ACK it - gets
> icside to build and AFAICS it's correct:
Booted and tested as working.
Whatever-tag-that-is: Russell King <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> diff --git a/drivers/ata/pata_icsid
Russell King wrote:
On Mon, Oct 15, 2007 at 03:54:16PM -0400, Jeff Garzik wrote:
Al Viro wrote:
Proposed addition to icside part, provided that ARM folks ACK it - gets
icside to build and AFAICS it's correct:
ACK from me too... ARM folks?
Will test tomorrow/Wednesday.
Thanks. Sorry about
On Mon, Oct 15, 2007 at 03:54:16PM -0400, Jeff Garzik wrote:
> Al Viro wrote:
> >Proposed addition to icside part, provided that ARM folks ACK it - gets
> >icside to build and AFAICS it's correct:
>
> ACK from me too... ARM folks?
Will test tomorrow/Wednesday.
--
Russell King
Linux kernel
Al Viro wrote:
Proposed addition to icside part, provided that ARM folks ACK it - gets
icside to build and AFAICS it's correct:
ACK from me too... ARM folks?
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordo
> How's about this patch?
>
> [PATCH] ide-pmac: fix pmac_ide_init_hwif_ports()
>
> * pmac_ide_init_hwif_ports() can be called by ide_init_hwif_ports()
> (through ppc_ide_md.ide_init_hwif hook) for non IDE PMAC interfaces.
> If this is the case the hw->io_ports[] should be already setup by
>
On Sunday 14 October 2007, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
>
> On Sun, 2007-10-14 at 00:41 +0200, Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz wrote:
> > On Sunday 14 October 2007, Alan Cox wrote:
> > > > > > /* Probably a PCI interface... */
> > > > > > for (i = IDE_DATA_OFFSET; i <= IDE_STATU
On Sunday 14 October 2007, Al Viro wrote:
> Proposed addition to icside part, provided that ARM folks ACK it - gets
> icside to build and AFAICS it's correct:
the patch looks good and gets my ACK but it is for Jeff ;)
> diff --git a/drivers/ata/pata_icside.c b/drivers/ata/pata_icside.c
> index be
Proposed addition to icside part, provided that ARM folks ACK it - gets
icside to build and AFAICS it's correct:
diff --git a/drivers/ata/pata_icside.c b/drivers/ata/pata_icside.c
index be30923..842fe08 100644
--- a/drivers/ata/pata_icside.c
+++ b/drivers/ata/pata_icside.c
@@ -332,12 +332,13 @@ st
On Sun, 2007-10-14 at 00:41 +0200, Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz wrote:
> On Sunday 14 October 2007, Alan Cox wrote:
> > > > > /* Probably a PCI interface... */
> > > > > for (i = IDE_DATA_OFFSET; i <= IDE_STATUS_OFFSET; ++i)
> > > > > hw->io_ports[i]
On Sunday 14 October 2007, Alan Cox wrote:
> > > > /* Probably a PCI interface... */
> > > > for (i = IDE_DATA_OFFSET; i <= IDE_STATUS_OFFSET; ++i)
> > > > hw->io_ports[i] = data_port + i -
> > > > IDE_DATA_OFFSET;
> > > > hw-
> > > /* Probably a PCI interface... */
> > > for (i = IDE_DATA_OFFSET; i <= IDE_STATUS_OFFSET; ++i)
> > > hw->io_ports[i] = data_port + i - IDE_DATA_OFFSET;
> > > hw->io_ports[IDE_CONTROL_OFFSET] = ctrl_port;
Ok so in actual fact
- The piece of cod
On Saturday 13 October 2007, Alan Cox wrote:
> > Comment in pmac_ide_init_hwif_ports() is highly misleading as this function
> > returns early only for "normal" IDE PCI devices (pmac_ide_init_hwif_ports()
> > can be called outside ide-pmac driver through ppc_ide_md).
>
> Follow the code you pasted
> Comment in pmac_ide_init_hwif_ports() is highly misleading as this function
> returns early only for "normal" IDE PCI devices (pmac_ide_init_hwif_ports()
> can be called outside ide-pmac driver through ppc_ide_md).
Follow the code you pasted
> pmif->regbase = (unsigned long) base + 0x2000
On Saturday 13 October 2007, Alan Cox wrote:
> On Sat, 13 Oct 2007 18:25:24 +0200
> Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > highlights of this update:
> >
> > * Rework of IDE PMAC host driver: bugfixes, removal of the code
> > duplicated from the IDE core an
On Sat, 13 Oct 2007 18:25:24 +0200
Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> highlights of this update:
>
> * Rework of IDE PMAC host driver: bugfixes, removal of the code
> duplicated from the IDE core and conversion to use the generic
> DMA tuning code path (the rew
21 matches
Mail list logo
