On Tue, Feb 20, 2007 at 06:49:17PM -0500, Jeff Garzik wrote:
> Can you narrow down the -gitX release further? i.e. does 2.6.20-git13
> perform at full speed? -git13 includes several libata changes, but does
> not include the ACPI additions.
>
> Since this is an ACPI execution error in the bug,
On Tue, Feb 20, 2007 at 06:49:17PM -0500, Jeff Garzik wrote:
> Can you narrow down the -gitX release further? i.e. does 2.6.20-git13
> perform at full speed? -git13 includes several libata changes, but does
> not include the ACPI additions.
>
> Since this is an ACPI execution error in the bug,
On Tue, 20 Feb 2007 22:47:17 +0100
Lukas Hejtmanek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hello,
>
> introducing SATA ACPI does not work for me (I've filled the bug
> report: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8046) beside those error
> messages, IDE performance is decreased. libata.noacpi=1 option
Lukas Hejtmanek wrote:
On Tue, Feb 20, 2007 at 05:23:21PM -0500, Jeff Garzik wrote:
introducing SATA ACPI does not work for me (I've filled the bug
report: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8046) beside those error
messages, IDE performance is decreased. libata.noacpi=1 option works ok
On Tue, Feb 20, 2007 at 05:23:21PM -0500, Jeff Garzik wrote:
> >introducing SATA ACPI does not work for me (I've filled the bug
> >report: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8046) beside those error
> >messages, IDE performance is decreased. libata.noacpi=1 option works ok but
> >the perfor
On Tue, Feb 20, 2007 at 05:23:56PM -0500, Jeff Garzik wrote:
> >introducing SATA ACPI does not work for me (I've filled the bug
> >report: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8046) beside those error
> >messages, IDE performance is decreased. libata.noacpi=1 option works ok but
> >the perfor
Lukas Hejtmanek wrote:
Hello,
introducing SATA ACPI does not work for me (I've filled the bug
report: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8046) beside those error
messages, IDE performance is decreased. libata.noacpi=1 option works ok but
the performance is still slightly degraded (about
Lukas Hejtmanek wrote:
Hello,
introducing SATA ACPI does not work for me (I've filled the bug
report: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8046) beside those error
messages, IDE performance is decreased. libata.noacpi=1 option works ok but
the performance is still slightly degraded (about
Hello,
introducing SATA ACPI does not work for me (I've filled the bug
report: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8046) beside those error
messages, IDE performance is decreased. libata.noacpi=1 option works ok but
the performance is still slightly degraded (about 10%).
--
Lukáš Hejtmáne
This has been living in libata-dev#ALL (and thus -mm) for quite a while
now.
For both PATA and SATA, this helps at suspend/resume time.
For SATA, ACPI support mostly consists of taskfiles (ATA commands) that
the BIOS wants us to send to the system drive. Most notably, if you
have set a hard driv
10 matches
Mail list logo