Re: [git patches] net driver fixes (50% rebased)

2008-02-24 Thread David Miller
From: Jeff Garzik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Sun, 24 Feb 2008 00:20:41 -0500 > > This is a 50% resend, rebased on top of net-2.6. > > Please pull from 'upstream-davem' branch of > master.kernel.org:/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/jgarzik/netdev-2.6.git > upstream-davem > > to receive the following

Re: [git patches] net driver fixes (50% rebased)

2008-02-24 Thread David Miller
From: Jeff Garzik [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Sun, 24 Feb 2008 00:20:41 -0500 This is a 50% resend, rebased on top of net-2.6. Please pull from 'upstream-davem' branch of master.kernel.org:/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/jgarzik/netdev-2.6.git upstream-davem to receive the following updates:

Re: [git patches] net driver fixes

2008-02-23 Thread David Miller
From: Jeff Garzik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Sun, 24 Feb 2008 00:48:54 -0500 > I trust you... Otherwise I wouldn't have volunteered to move my > upstream from Linus to you :) ... > So (as you saw in last email)... rebased and resend. Thanks :) -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line

Re: [git patches] net driver fixes

2008-02-23 Thread Jeff Garzik
David Miller wrote: Jeff, I really don't want to pull that tree in. Please trust me as your upstream to handle merging issues, as needed. I trust you... Otherwise I wouldn't have volunteered to move my upstream from Linus to you :) My main issues/motivations were: * quite simply, just

Re: [git patches] net driver fixes

2008-02-23 Thread Jeff Garzik
David Miller wrote: Jeff, I really don't want to pull that tree in. Please trust me as your upstream to handle merging issues, as needed. I trust you... Otherwise I wouldn't have volunteered to move my upstream from Linus to you :) My main issues/motivations were: * quite simply, just

Re: [git patches] net driver fixes

2008-02-23 Thread David Miller
From: Jeff Garzik [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Sun, 24 Feb 2008 00:48:54 -0500 I trust you... Otherwise I wouldn't have volunteered to move my upstream from Linus to you :) ... So (as you saw in last email)... rebased and resend. Thanks :) -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line

Re: [git patches] net driver fixes

2008-02-20 Thread David Miller
From: Francois Romieu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Wed, 20 Feb 2008 23:40:53 +0100 > David Miller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> : > [...] > > Because it forces me to pull Linus's upstream into net-2.6, > > I don't have any choice in the matter. > > Jeff's choice is a bit surprizing. That being said, it would

Re: [git patches] net driver fixes

2008-02-20 Thread Francois Romieu
David Miller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> : [...] > Because it forces me to pull Linus's upstream into net-2.6, > I don't have any choice in the matter. Jeff's choice is a bit surprizing. That being said, it would had been nice to fast-forward net-2.6 from a442585952f137bd4cdb1f2f3166e4157d383b82 to

Re: [git patches] net driver fixes

2008-02-20 Thread David Miller
From: "J. Bruce Fields" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Wed, 20 Feb 2008 17:25:30 -0500 > The advantages include earlier warning of merge problems, and avoidance > of duplicate commits--if Jeff's done work that depends on patches that > already upstream, then he either does that work against upstream,

Re: [git patches] net driver fixes

2008-02-20 Thread J. Bruce Fields
On Wed, Feb 20, 2008 at 01:42:57PM -0800, David Miller wrote: > From: "J. Bruce Fields" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Date: Wed, 20 Feb 2008 16:23:02 -0500 > > > On Wed, Feb 20, 2008 at 01:15:30PM -0800, David Miller wrote: > > > From: Jeff Garzik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > Date: Wed, 20 Feb 2008 11:55:57

Re: [git patches] net driver fixes

2008-02-20 Thread David Miller
From: "J. Bruce Fields" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Wed, 20 Feb 2008 16:23:02 -0500 > On Wed, Feb 20, 2008 at 01:15:30PM -0800, David Miller wrote: > > From: Jeff Garzik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > Date: Wed, 20 Feb 2008 11:55:57 -0500 > > > > > > > > Note: this is based off of Linus's latest commit

Re: [git patches] net driver fixes

2008-02-20 Thread J. Bruce Fields
On Wed, Feb 20, 2008 at 01:15:30PM -0800, David Miller wrote: > From: Jeff Garzik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Date: Wed, 20 Feb 2008 11:55:57 -0500 > > > > > Note: this is based off of Linus's latest commit > > (5d9c4a7de64d398604a978d267a6987f1f4025b7), since all my previous > > submissions are now

Re: [git patches] net driver fixes

2008-02-20 Thread David Miller
From: Jeff Garzik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Wed, 20 Feb 2008 11:55:57 -0500 > > Note: this is based off of Linus's latest commit > (5d9c4a7de64d398604a978d267a6987f1f4025b7), since all my previous > submissions are now upstream (thanks!). The whole point of my not rebasing net-2.6 is so that

[git patches] net driver fixes

2008-02-20 Thread Jeff Garzik
Note: this is based off of Linus's latest commit (5d9c4a7de64d398604a978d267a6987f1f4025b7), since all my previous submissions are now upstream (thanks!). Please pull from 'upstream-davem' branch of master.kernel.org:/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/jgarzik/netdev-2.6.git upstream-davem to receive

[git patches] net driver fixes

2008-02-20 Thread Jeff Garzik
Note: this is based off of Linus's latest commit (5d9c4a7de64d398604a978d267a6987f1f4025b7), since all my previous submissions are now upstream (thanks!). Please pull from 'upstream-davem' branch of master.kernel.org:/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/jgarzik/netdev-2.6.git upstream-davem to receive

Re: [git patches] net driver fixes

2008-02-20 Thread David Miller
From: Jeff Garzik [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Wed, 20 Feb 2008 11:55:57 -0500 Note: this is based off of Linus's latest commit (5d9c4a7de64d398604a978d267a6987f1f4025b7), since all my previous submissions are now upstream (thanks!). The whole point of my not rebasing net-2.6 is so that you can

Re: [git patches] net driver fixes

2008-02-20 Thread J. Bruce Fields
On Wed, Feb 20, 2008 at 01:15:30PM -0800, David Miller wrote: From: Jeff Garzik [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Wed, 20 Feb 2008 11:55:57 -0500 Note: this is based off of Linus's latest commit (5d9c4a7de64d398604a978d267a6987f1f4025b7), since all my previous submissions are now upstream

Re: [git patches] net driver fixes

2008-02-20 Thread J. Bruce Fields
On Wed, Feb 20, 2008 at 01:42:57PM -0800, David Miller wrote: From: J. Bruce Fields [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Wed, 20 Feb 2008 16:23:02 -0500 On Wed, Feb 20, 2008 at 01:15:30PM -0800, David Miller wrote: From: Jeff Garzik [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Wed, 20 Feb 2008 11:55:57 -0500

Re: [git patches] net driver fixes

2008-02-20 Thread David Miller
From: J. Bruce Fields [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Wed, 20 Feb 2008 17:25:30 -0500 The advantages include earlier warning of merge problems, and avoidance of duplicate commits--if Jeff's done work that depends on patches that already upstream, then he either does that work against upstream, or

Re: [git patches] net driver fixes

2008-02-20 Thread Francois Romieu
David Miller [EMAIL PROTECTED] : [...] Because it forces me to pull Linus's upstream into net-2.6, I don't have any choice in the matter. Jeff's choice is a bit surprizing. That being said, it would had been nice to fast-forward net-2.6 from a442585952f137bd4cdb1f2f3166e4157d383b82 to Linus's

Re: [git patches] net driver fixes

2008-02-20 Thread David Miller
From: Francois Romieu [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Wed, 20 Feb 2008 23:40:53 +0100 David Miller [EMAIL PROTECTED] : [...] Because it forces me to pull Linus's upstream into net-2.6, I don't have any choice in the matter. Jeff's choice is a bit surprizing. That being said, it would had been

Re: [git patches] net driver fixes

2008-02-15 Thread Jeff Garzik
David Miller wrote: From: Jeff Garzik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Fri, 15 Feb 2008 11:03:14 -0500 Please pull from 'upstream-davem' branch of master.kernel.org:/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/jgarzik/netdev-2.6.git upstream-davem Pulled and pushed out. As I mentioned to John Linville just now, I'm

Re: [git patches] net driver fixes

2008-02-15 Thread David Miller
From: Jeff Garzik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Fri, 15 Feb 2008 11:03:14 -0500 > Please pull from 'upstream-davem' branch of > master.kernel.org:/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/jgarzik/netdev-2.6.git > upstream-davem Pulled and pushed out. As I mentioned to John Linville just now, I'm going to try and

[git patches] net driver fixes

2008-02-15 Thread Jeff Garzik
Process note: 'upstream-davem' continues the git history that began the previous push. This sometimes happens when I continue to commit locally, working in parallel while waiting for changes to hit Linus upstream. As current net-2.6.git appears to have the same commit ids that I submitted in

[git patches] net driver fixes

2008-02-15 Thread Jeff Garzik
Process note: 'upstream-davem' continues the git history that began the previous push. This sometimes happens when I continue to commit locally, working in parallel while waiting for changes to hit Linus upstream. As current net-2.6.git appears to have the same commit ids that I submitted in

Re: [git patches] net driver fixes

2008-02-15 Thread David Miller
From: Jeff Garzik [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Fri, 15 Feb 2008 11:03:14 -0500 Please pull from 'upstream-davem' branch of master.kernel.org:/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/jgarzik/netdev-2.6.git upstream-davem Pulled and pushed out. As I mentioned to John Linville just now, I'm going to try and keep

Re: [git patches] net driver fixes

2008-02-15 Thread Jeff Garzik
David Miller wrote: From: Jeff Garzik [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Fri, 15 Feb 2008 11:03:14 -0500 Please pull from 'upstream-davem' branch of master.kernel.org:/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/jgarzik/netdev-2.6.git upstream-davem Pulled and pushed out. As I mentioned to John Linville just now, I'm

Re: [git patches] net driver fixes

2008-01-30 Thread Sam Ravnborg
On Wed, Jan 30, 2008 at 11:47:11PM +0100, Francois Romieu wrote: > Sam Ravnborg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> : > [...] > > > -static struct pci_device_id sis190_pci_tbl[] __devinitdata = { > > > +static struct pci_device_id sis190_pci_tbl[] = { > > > { PCI_DEVICE(PCI_VENDOR_ID_SI, 0x0190), 0, 0, 0 }, > >

Re: [git patches] net driver fixes

2008-01-30 Thread Francois Romieu
Sam Ravnborg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> : [...] > > -static struct pci_device_id sis190_pci_tbl[] __devinitdata = { > > +static struct pci_device_id sis190_pci_tbl[] = { > > { PCI_DEVICE(PCI_VENDOR_ID_SI, 0x0190), 0, 0, 0 }, > > { PCI_DEVICE(PCI_VENDOR_ID_SI, 0x0191), 0, 0, 1 }, > > { 0, }, >

Re: [git patches] net driver fixes

2008-01-30 Thread Jeff Garzik
Sam Ravnborg wrote: Jeff Garzik (1): [netdrvr] sis190: build fix But you did it wrong... sis190.c b/drivers/net/sis190.c index b570402..2e9e88b 100644 --- a/drivers/net/sis190.c +++ b/drivers/net/sis190.c @@ -326,7 +326,7 @@ static const struct { { "SiS 191 PCI Gigabit Ethernet

Re: [git patches] net driver fixes

2008-01-30 Thread Sam Ravnborg
> > Jeff Garzik (1): > [netdrvr] sis190: build fix But you did it wrong... sis190.c b/drivers/net/sis190.c > index b570402..2e9e88b 100644 > --- a/drivers/net/sis190.c > +++ b/drivers/net/sis190.c > @@ -326,7 +326,7 @@ static const struct { > { "SiS 191 PCI Gigabit Ethernet adapter"

[git patches] net driver fixes

2008-01-30 Thread Jeff Garzik
First pass through the queue that built up over the weekend (plus a few others that just missed 2.6.24 release), with a focus specifically on fixes. Please pull from 'upstream-davem' branch of master.kernel.org:/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/jgarzik/netdev-2.6.git upstream-davem to receive the

[git patches] net driver fixes

2008-01-30 Thread Jeff Garzik
First pass through the queue that built up over the weekend (plus a few others that just missed 2.6.24 release), with a focus specifically on fixes. Please pull from 'upstream-davem' branch of master.kernel.org:/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/jgarzik/netdev-2.6.git upstream-davem to receive the

Re: [git patches] net driver fixes

2008-01-30 Thread Jeff Garzik
Sam Ravnborg wrote: Jeff Garzik (1): [netdrvr] sis190: build fix But you did it wrong... sis190.c b/drivers/net/sis190.c index b570402..2e9e88b 100644 --- a/drivers/net/sis190.c +++ b/drivers/net/sis190.c @@ -326,7 +326,7 @@ static const struct { { SiS 191 PCI Gigabit Ethernet

Re: [git patches] net driver fixes

2008-01-30 Thread Sam Ravnborg
Jeff Garzik (1): [netdrvr] sis190: build fix But you did it wrong... sis190.c b/drivers/net/sis190.c index b570402..2e9e88b 100644 --- a/drivers/net/sis190.c +++ b/drivers/net/sis190.c @@ -326,7 +326,7 @@ static const struct { { SiS 191 PCI Gigabit Ethernet adapter }, };

Re: [git patches] net driver fixes

2008-01-30 Thread Francois Romieu
Sam Ravnborg [EMAIL PROTECTED] : [...] -static struct pci_device_id sis190_pci_tbl[] __devinitdata = { +static struct pci_device_id sis190_pci_tbl[] = { { PCI_DEVICE(PCI_VENDOR_ID_SI, 0x0190), 0, 0, 0 }, { PCI_DEVICE(PCI_VENDOR_ID_SI, 0x0191), 0, 0, 1 }, { 0, }, The

Re: [git patches] net driver fixes

2008-01-30 Thread Sam Ravnborg
On Wed, Jan 30, 2008 at 11:47:11PM +0100, Francois Romieu wrote: Sam Ravnborg [EMAIL PROTECTED] : [...] -static struct pci_device_id sis190_pci_tbl[] __devinitdata = { +static struct pci_device_id sis190_pci_tbl[] = { { PCI_DEVICE(PCI_VENDOR_ID_SI, 0x0190), 0, 0, 0 }, {

[git patches] net driver fixes

2008-01-12 Thread Jeff Garzik
Please pull from 'upstream-linus' branch of master.kernel.org:/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/jgarzik/netdev-2.6.git upstream-linus to receive the following updates: MAINTAINERS | 10 ++- drivers/net/3c509.c |4 + drivers/net/Kconfig

[git patches] net driver fixes

2008-01-12 Thread Jeff Garzik
Please pull from 'upstream-linus' branch of master.kernel.org:/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/jgarzik/netdev-2.6.git upstream-linus to receive the following updates: MAINTAINERS | 10 ++- drivers/net/3c509.c |4 + drivers/net/Kconfig

Re: [git patches] net driver fixes

2007-12-22 Thread Al Viro
On Sun, Dec 23, 2007 at 01:42:14AM -0500, Jeff Garzik wrote: > I applied it to #upstream (2.6.25) since forcedeth is not on any > big-endian platforms AFAIK. All right, then... I hadn't been sure if it's onboard-only, that's all. > I have an epic100 card too if you need it (though it sounds

Re: [git patches] net driver fixes

2007-12-22 Thread Jeff Garzik
Al Viro wrote: On Sun, Dec 23, 2007 at 12:33:14AM -0500, Jeff Garzik wrote: A couple [minorly] notable wireless bug fixes, and plenty of viro fixes for obscure issues :) Heh... FWIW, forcedeth patch (sent your way about two weeks ago) also belongs in the same set. If you need a resend -

Re: [git patches] net driver fixes

2007-12-22 Thread Al Viro
On Sun, Dec 23, 2007 at 12:33:14AM -0500, Jeff Garzik wrote: > > A couple [minorly] notable wireless bug fixes, and plenty of viro fixes > for obscure issues :) Heh... FWIW, forcedeth patch (sent your way about two weeks ago) also belongs in the same set. If you need a resend - tell...

Re: [git patches] net driver fixes

2007-12-22 Thread Al Viro
On Sun, Dec 23, 2007 at 12:33:14AM -0500, Jeff Garzik wrote: A couple [minorly] notable wireless bug fixes, and plenty of viro fixes for obscure issues :) Heh... FWIW, forcedeth patch (sent your way about two weeks ago) also belongs in the same set. If you need a resend - tell... There's

Re: [git patches] net driver fixes

2007-12-22 Thread Jeff Garzik
Al Viro wrote: On Sun, Dec 23, 2007 at 12:33:14AM -0500, Jeff Garzik wrote: A couple [minorly] notable wireless bug fixes, and plenty of viro fixes for obscure issues :) Heh... FWIW, forcedeth patch (sent your way about two weeks ago) also belongs in the same set. If you need a resend -

Re: [git patches] net driver fixes

2007-12-22 Thread Al Viro
On Sun, Dec 23, 2007 at 01:42:14AM -0500, Jeff Garzik wrote: I applied it to #upstream (2.6.25) since forcedeth is not on any big-endian platforms AFAIK. All right, then... I hadn't been sure if it's onboard-only, that's all. I have an epic100 card too if you need it (though it sounds like

[git patches] net driver fixes

2007-12-17 Thread Jeff Garzik
A couple serious fixes (wireless, e100, sky2) and a bevy of minor ones. Please pull from 'upstream-linus' branch of master.kernel.org:/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/jgarzik/netdev-2.6.git upstream-linus to receive the following updates: MAINTAINERS|6 ++

[git patches] net driver fixes

2007-12-17 Thread Jeff Garzik
A couple serious fixes (wireless, e100, sky2) and a bevy of minor ones. Please pull from 'upstream-linus' branch of master.kernel.org:/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/jgarzik/netdev-2.6.git upstream-linus to receive the following updates: MAINTAINERS|6 ++

[git patches] net driver fixes

2007-12-07 Thread Jeff Garzik
Nothing remarkable. Mainly bonding fixes and bringing ibm_newemac up to snuff. Please pull from 'upstream-linus' branch of master.kernel.org:/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/jgarzik/netdev-2.6.git upstream-linus to receive the following updates: Documentation/networking/bonding.txt | 29

[git patches] net driver fixes

2007-12-07 Thread Jeff Garzik
Nothing remarkable. Mainly bonding fixes and bringing ibm_newemac up to snuff. Please pull from 'upstream-linus' branch of master.kernel.org:/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/jgarzik/netdev-2.6.git upstream-linus to receive the following updates: Documentation/networking/bonding.txt | 29

[git patches] net driver fixes

2007-12-04 Thread Jeff Garzik
Fixes several ugly bugs... Please pull from 'upstream-fixes' branch of master.kernel.org:/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/jgarzik/netdev-2.6.git upstream-fixes to receive the following updates: drivers/net/fec_mpc52xx.c|4 ++-- drivers/net/gianfar.c|2 +-

[git patches] net driver fixes

2007-12-04 Thread Jeff Garzik
Fixes several ugly bugs... Please pull from 'upstream-fixes' branch of master.kernel.org:/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/jgarzik/netdev-2.6.git upstream-fixes to receive the following updates: drivers/net/fec_mpc52xx.c|4 ++-- drivers/net/gianfar.c|2 +-

Re: [LIKELY_SPAM][git patches] net driver fixes

2007-12-01 Thread Divy Le Ray
Jeff Garzik wrote: Notes: 1) Several of these are resends from the last submission. 2) That chelsio file mode change (644->755) is a bit annoying. Can git do chmod as a changeset by itself? Sorry for this. I had not noticed it. If any help, I just submitted a patch reverting the file mode

Re: [LIKELY_SPAM][git patches] net driver fixes

2007-12-01 Thread Divy Le Ray
Jeff Garzik wrote: Notes: 1) Several of these are resends from the last submission. 2) That chelsio file mode change (644-755) is a bit annoying. Can git do chmod as a changeset by itself? Sorry for this. I had not noticed it. If any help, I just submitted a patch reverting the file mode

[git patches] net driver fixes

2007-11-26 Thread Jeff Garzik
Please pull from 'upstream-linus' branch of master.kernel.org:/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/jgarzik/netdev-2.6.git upstream-linus to receive the following updates: drivers/net/Kconfig|2 +- drivers/net/amd8111e.c |6 ++ drivers/net/bfin_mac.c |2 +-

[git patches] net driver fixes

2007-11-26 Thread Jeff Garzik
Please pull from 'upstream-linus' branch of master.kernel.org:/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/jgarzik/netdev-2.6.git upstream-linus to receive the following updates: drivers/net/Kconfig|2 +- drivers/net/amd8111e.c |6 ++ drivers/net/bfin_mac.c |2 +-

[git patches] net driver fixes

2007-11-10 Thread Jeff Garzik
Please pull from 'upstream-linus' branch of master.kernel.org:/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/jgarzik/netdev-2.6.git upstream-linus to receive the following updates: MAINTAINERS | 10 ++- drivers/net/Kconfig |2 +-

[git patches] net driver fixes

2007-11-10 Thread Jeff Garzik
Please pull from 'upstream-linus' branch of master.kernel.org:/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/jgarzik/netdev-2.6.git upstream-linus to receive the following updates: MAINTAINERS | 10 ++- drivers/net/Kconfig |2 +-

[git patches] net driver fixes

2007-11-05 Thread Jeff Garzik
Please pull from 'upstream-linus' branch of master.kernel.org:/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/jgarzik/netdev-2.6.git upstream-linus to receive the following updates: drivers/net/82596.c |3 ++- drivers/net/phy/marvell.c| 23 ++- drivers/net/phy/phy_device.c |

[git patches] net driver fixes

2007-11-05 Thread Jeff Garzik
Please pull from 'upstream-linus' branch of master.kernel.org:/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/jgarzik/netdev-2.6.git upstream-linus to receive the following updates: drivers/net/82596.c |3 ++- drivers/net/phy/marvell.c| 23 ++- drivers/net/phy/phy_device.c |

[git patches] net driver fixes

2007-11-01 Thread Jeff Garzik
Please pull from 'upstream-linus' branch of master.kernel.org:/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/jgarzik/netdev-2.6.git upstream-linus to receive the following updates: drivers/net/Kconfig |4 +--- drivers/net/fec_mpc52xx.c |4 ++-- drivers/net/myri10ge/myri10ge.c |6

[git patches] net driver fixes

2007-11-01 Thread Jeff Garzik
Please pull from 'upstream-linus' branch of master.kernel.org:/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/jgarzik/netdev-2.6.git upstream-linus to receive the following updates: drivers/net/Kconfig |4 +--- drivers/net/fec_mpc52xx.c |4 ++-- drivers/net/myri10ge/myri10ge.c |6

[git patches] net driver fixes

2007-10-30 Thread Jeff Garzik
Fixes, and a new DM9601 USB NIC id. Please pull from 'upstream-linus' branch of master.kernel.org:/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/jgarzik/netdev-2.6.git upstream-linus to receive the following updates: drivers/net/bfin_mac.c|2 - drivers/net/e1000/e1000.h |8 +++

[git patches] net driver fixes

2007-10-30 Thread Jeff Garzik
Fixes, and a new DM9601 USB NIC id. Please pull from 'upstream-linus' branch of master.kernel.org:/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/jgarzik/netdev-2.6.git upstream-linus to receive the following updates: drivers/net/bfin_mac.c|2 - drivers/net/e1000/e1000.h |8 +++

[git patches] net driver fixes

2007-10-19 Thread Jeff Garzik
Please pull from 'upstream-linus' branch of master.kernel.org:/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/jgarzik/netdev-2.6.git upstream-linus to receive the following updates: drivers/net/Kconfig | 41 - drivers/net/dm9000.c|6 ++--

[git patches] net driver fixes

2007-10-19 Thread Jeff Garzik
Please pull from 'upstream-linus' branch of master.kernel.org:/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/jgarzik/netdev-2.6.git upstream-linus to receive the following updates: drivers/net/Kconfig | 41 - drivers/net/dm9000.c|6 ++--

[git patches] net driver fixes

2007-10-17 Thread Jeff Garzik
Please pull from 'upstream-linus' branch of master.kernel.org:/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/jgarzik/netdev-2.6.git upstream-linus to receive the following updates: drivers/net/3c59x.c|2 +- drivers/net/forcedeth.c| 27 ++---

[git patches] net driver fixes

2007-10-17 Thread Jeff Garzik
Please pull from 'upstream-linus' branch of master.kernel.org:/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/jgarzik/netdev-2.6.git upstream-linus to receive the following updates: drivers/net/3c59x.c|2 +- drivers/net/forcedeth.c| 27 ++---

[git patches] net driver fixes (mostly)

2007-10-16 Thread Jeff Garzik
Mostly fixes, except a couple things from Stephen H and myself. Please pull from 'upstream-linus' branch of master.kernel.org:/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/jgarzik/netdev-2.6.git upstream-linus to receive the following updates: drivers/net/3c59x.c |8 +- drivers/net/Kconfig

[git patches] net driver fixes (mostly)

2007-10-16 Thread Jeff Garzik
Mostly fixes, except a couple things from Stephen H and myself. Please pull from 'upstream-linus' branch of master.kernel.org:/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/jgarzik/netdev-2.6.git upstream-linus to receive the following updates: drivers/net/3c59x.c |8 +- drivers/net/Kconfig

[git patches] net driver fixes

2007-10-03 Thread Jeff Garzik
sky2 is really the only important fix, the others are trivial. Please pull from 'upstream-linus' branch of master.kernel.org:/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/jgarzik/netdev-2.6.git upstream-linus to receive the following updates: drivers/net/sky2.c |3 ---

[git patches] net driver fixes

2007-10-03 Thread Jeff Garzik
sky2 is really the only important fix, the others are trivial. Please pull from 'upstream-linus' branch of master.kernel.org:/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/jgarzik/netdev-2.6.git upstream-linus to receive the following updates: drivers/net/sky2.c |3 ---

[git patches] net driver fixes

2007-10-02 Thread Jeff Garzik
Please pull from 'upstream-linus' branch of master.kernel.org:/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/jgarzik/netdev-2.6.git upstream-linus to receive the following updates: drivers/net/mv643xx_eth.c |1 - drivers/net/qla3xxx.c |7 +++ drivers/net/usb/dm9601.c |2 +- 3 files changed, 8

[git patches] net driver fixes

2007-10-02 Thread Jeff Garzik
Please pull from 'upstream-linus' branch of master.kernel.org:/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/jgarzik/netdev-2.6.git upstream-linus to receive the following updates: drivers/net/mv643xx_eth.c |1 - drivers/net/qla3xxx.c |7 +++ drivers/net/usb/dm9601.c |2 +- 3 files changed, 8

[git patches] net driver fixes

2007-09-27 Thread Jeff Garzik
And an e1000 id patch. Please pull from 'upstream-linus' branch of master.kernel.org:/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/jgarzik/netdev-2.6.git upstream-linus to receive the following updates: drivers/net/e1000/e1000_ethtool.c |1 + drivers/net/e1000/e1000_hw.c |1 +

[git patches] net driver fixes

2007-09-27 Thread Jeff Garzik
And an e1000 id patch. Please pull from 'upstream-linus' branch of master.kernel.org:/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/jgarzik/netdev-2.6.git upstream-linus to receive the following updates: drivers/net/e1000/e1000_ethtool.c |1 + drivers/net/e1000/e1000_hw.c |1 +

[git patches] net driver fixes

2007-09-24 Thread Jeff Garzik
Please pull from 'upstream-linus' branch of master.kernel.org:/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/jgarzik/netdev-2.6.git upstream-linus to receive the following updates: drivers/net/pcmcia/3c589_cs.c |2 +- drivers/net/r8169.c | 14 +- drivers/net/sky2.c| 37

[git patches] net driver fixes

2007-09-24 Thread Jeff Garzik
Please pull from 'upstream-linus' branch of master.kernel.org:/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/jgarzik/netdev-2.6.git upstream-linus to receive the following updates: drivers/net/pcmcia/3c589_cs.c |2 +- drivers/net/r8169.c | 14 +- drivers/net/sky2.c| 37

[git patches] net driver fixes

2007-09-20 Thread Jeff Garzik
This includes the sky2 update that you and sch discussed. Please pull from 'upstream-linus' branch of master.kernel.org:/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/jgarzik/netdev-2.6.git upstream-linus to receive the following updates: drivers/net/myri10ge/myri10ge.c |3 + drivers/net/phy/phy.c

[git patches] net driver fixes

2007-09-20 Thread Jeff Garzik
This includes the sky2 update that you and sch discussed. Please pull from 'upstream-linus' branch of master.kernel.org:/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/jgarzik/netdev-2.6.git upstream-linus to receive the following updates: drivers/net/myri10ge/myri10ge.c |3 + drivers/net/phy/phy.c

Re: [git patches] net driver fixes

2007-09-14 Thread Kok, Auke
Dan Williams wrote: On Thu, 2007-09-13 at 01:30 -0400, Jeff Garzik wrote: Please pull from 'upstream-linus' branch of master.kernel.org:/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/jgarzik/netdev-2.6.git upstream-linus to receive the following updates: drivers/net/atl1/atl1_main.c | 19 +++

Re: [git patches] net driver fixes

2007-09-14 Thread Jay Vosburgh
Dan Williams <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: [...] >So essentially the ehea device has a 1(+) external ports that may/may >not be connected, but all lpars share the physical hardware itself, >which is quite happy to let all the lpars talk to each other essentially >via loopback even if there is no

Re: [git patches] net driver fixes

2007-09-14 Thread Dan Williams
On Fri, 2007-09-14 at 12:19 -0700, Jay Vosburgh wrote: > Dan Williams <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > [...] > >I admit that I probably don't understand the system architecture of > >where ehea would be used, but would this > >cause /sys/class/net/ethX/carrier to be TRUE even if the device has no >

Re: [git patches] net driver fixes

2007-09-14 Thread Jay Vosburgh
Dan Williams <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: [...] >I admit that I probably don't understand the system architecture of >where ehea would be used, but would this >cause /sys/class/net/ethX/carrier to be TRUE even if the device has no >carrier? That seems quite wrong IMHO. When does ehea not have a

Re: [git patches] net driver fixes

2007-09-14 Thread Dan Williams
On Fri, 2007-09-14 at 14:17 -0400, Jeff Garzik wrote: > Dan Williams wrote: > > WTF? why would the default be to _not_ propagate carrier state? Are > > there some mitigating circumstances that require this driver to not > > notify the stack of carrier on/off? Userspace stuff really should know

Re: [git patches] net driver fixes

2007-09-14 Thread Jeff Garzik
Dan Williams wrote: WTF? why would the default be to _not_ propagate carrier state? Are there some mitigating circumstances that require this driver to not notify the stack of carrier on/off? Userspace stuff really should know about the carrier state, and this disables it by default. The

Re: [git patches] net driver fixes

2007-09-14 Thread Dan Williams
On Thu, 2007-09-13 at 01:30 -0400, Jeff Garzik wrote: > Please pull from 'upstream-linus' branch of > master.kernel.org:/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/jgarzik/netdev-2.6.git > upstream-linus > > to receive the following updates: > > drivers/net/atl1/atl1_main.c | 19 +++ >

Re: [git patches] net driver fixes

2007-09-14 Thread Dan Williams
On Thu, 2007-09-13 at 01:30 -0400, Jeff Garzik wrote: Please pull from 'upstream-linus' branch of master.kernel.org:/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/jgarzik/netdev-2.6.git upstream-linus to receive the following updates: drivers/net/atl1/atl1_main.c | 19 +++

Re: [git patches] net driver fixes

2007-09-14 Thread Jeff Garzik
Dan Williams wrote: WTF? why would the default be to _not_ propagate carrier state? Are there some mitigating circumstances that require this driver to not notify the stack of carrier on/off? Userspace stuff really should know about the carrier state, and this disables it by default. The

Re: [git patches] net driver fixes

2007-09-14 Thread Dan Williams
On Fri, 2007-09-14 at 14:17 -0400, Jeff Garzik wrote: Dan Williams wrote: WTF? why would the default be to _not_ propagate carrier state? Are there some mitigating circumstances that require this driver to not notify the stack of carrier on/off? Userspace stuff really should know about

Re: [git patches] net driver fixes

2007-09-14 Thread Jay Vosburgh
Dan Williams [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: [...] I admit that I probably don't understand the system architecture of where ehea would be used, but would this cause /sys/class/net/ethX/carrier to be TRUE even if the device has no carrier? That seems quite wrong IMHO. When does ehea not have a carrier?

Re: [git patches] net driver fixes

2007-09-14 Thread Dan Williams
On Fri, 2007-09-14 at 12:19 -0700, Jay Vosburgh wrote: Dan Williams [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: [...] I admit that I probably don't understand the system architecture of where ehea would be used, but would this cause /sys/class/net/ethX/carrier to be TRUE even if the device has no carrier?

Re: [git patches] net driver fixes

2007-09-14 Thread Jay Vosburgh
Dan Williams [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: [...] So essentially the ehea device has a 1(+) external ports that may/may not be connected, but all lpars share the physical hardware itself, which is quite happy to let all the lpars talk to each other essentially via loopback even if there is no actual

Re: [git patches] net driver fixes

2007-09-14 Thread Kok, Auke
Dan Williams wrote: On Thu, 2007-09-13 at 01:30 -0400, Jeff Garzik wrote: Please pull from 'upstream-linus' branch of master.kernel.org:/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/jgarzik/netdev-2.6.git upstream-linus to receive the following updates: drivers/net/atl1/atl1_main.c | 19 +++

[git patches] net driver fixes

2007-09-12 Thread Jeff Garzik
Please pull from 'upstream-linus' branch of master.kernel.org:/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/jgarzik/netdev-2.6.git upstream-linus to receive the following updates: drivers/net/atl1/atl1_main.c | 19 +++ drivers/net/ehea/ehea.h |5 - drivers/net/ehea/ehea_main.c |

[git patches] net driver fixes

2007-09-12 Thread Jeff Garzik
Please pull from 'upstream-linus' branch of master.kernel.org:/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/jgarzik/netdev-2.6.git upstream-linus to receive the following updates: drivers/net/atl1/atl1_main.c | 19 +++ drivers/net/ehea/ehea.h |5 - drivers/net/ehea/ehea_main.c |

[git patches] net driver fixes

2007-08-31 Thread Jeff Garzik
Please pull from 'upstream-linus' branch of master.kernel.org:/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/jgarzik/netdev-2.6.git upstream-linus to receive the following updates: drivers/infiniband/hw/cxgb3/cxio_hal.c |2 +- drivers/net/cxgb3/adapter.h|2 + drivers/net/cxgb3/common.h

Re: [git patches] net driver fixes

2007-08-31 Thread Jeff Garzik
Satyam Sharma wrote: On Mon, 30 Jul 2007, Jeff Garzik wrote: true, we should just remove the dev==NULL check Patch below: [PATCH] nmclan_cs: Remove bogus (dev==NULL) check in mace_interrupt() The (dev == NULL) check in drivers/net/pcmcia/nmclan_cs.c:mace_interrupt() handler is always

[git patches] net driver fixes

2007-08-31 Thread Jeff Garzik
Please pull from 'upstream-linus' branch of master.kernel.org:/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/jgarzik/netdev-2.6.git upstream-linus to receive the following updates: drivers/infiniband/hw/cxgb3/cxio_hal.c |2 +- drivers/net/cxgb3/adapter.h|2 + drivers/net/cxgb3/common.h

Re: [git patches] net driver fixes

2007-08-31 Thread Jeff Garzik
Satyam Sharma wrote: On Mon, 30 Jul 2007, Jeff Garzik wrote: true, we should just remove the dev==NULL check Patch below: [PATCH] nmclan_cs: Remove bogus (dev==NULL) check in mace_interrupt() The (dev == NULL) check in drivers/net/pcmcia/nmclan_cs.c:mace_interrupt() handler is always

[git patches] net driver fixes

2007-08-25 Thread Jeff Garzik
Please pull from 'upstream-linus' branch of master.kernel.org:/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/jgarzik/netdev-2.6.git upstream-linus to receive the following updates: drivers/net/dm9000.c| 25 --- drivers/net/ehea/ehea_main.c|8 ++-- drivers/net/ehea/ehea_qmr.c

  1   2   >