Ingo Molnar wrote:
> * Max Krasnyansky <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> Ingo said a few different things (a bit too large to quote).
>
> [...]
>> And at the end he said:
>>> Also, i'd not mind some test-coverage in sched.git as well.
>
>> I far as I know "do not mind" does not mean "must go to"
* Max Krasnyansky <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Ingo said a few different things (a bit too large to quote).
[...]
> And at the end he said:
> > Also, i'd not mind some test-coverage in sched.git as well.
> I far as I know "do not mind" does not mean "must go to" ;-). [...]
the CPU isolation
* Max Krasnyansky [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Ingo said a few different things (a bit too large to quote).
[...]
And at the end he said:
Also, i'd not mind some test-coverage in sched.git as well.
I far as I know do not mind does not mean must go to ;-). [...]
the CPU isolation related
Ingo Molnar wrote:
* Max Krasnyansky [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Ingo said a few different things (a bit too large to quote).
[...]
And at the end he said:
Also, i'd not mind some test-coverage in sched.git as well.
I far as I know do not mind does not mean must go to ;-). [...]
the
Paul Jackson wrote:
> Max wrote:
>> Linus, please pull CPU isolation extensions from
>
> Did I miss something in this discussion? I thought
> Ingo was quite clear, and Linus pretty clear too,
> that this patch should bake in *-mm or some such
> place for a bit first.
>
Andrew said:
> The
Max wrote:
> Linus, please pull CPU isolation extensions from
Did I miss something in this discussion? I thought
Ingo was quite clear, and Linus pretty clear too,
that this patch should bake in *-mm or some such
place for a bit first.
--
I won't rest till it's the best ...
Linus, please pull CPU isolation extensions from
git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/maxk/cpuisol-2.6.git for-linus
Diffstat:
Documentation/ABI/testing/sysfs-devices-system-cpu | 41 +++
Documentation/cpu-isolation.txt| 113 +
Linus, please pull CPU isolation extensions from
git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/maxk/cpuisol-2.6.git for-linus
Diffstat:
Documentation/ABI/testing/sysfs-devices-system-cpu | 41 +++
Documentation/cpu-isolation.txt| 113 +
Max wrote:
Linus, please pull CPU isolation extensions from
Did I miss something in this discussion? I thought
Ingo was quite clear, and Linus pretty clear too,
that this patch should bake in *-mm or some such
place for a bit first.
--
I won't rest till it's the best ...
Paul Jackson wrote:
Max wrote:
Linus, please pull CPU isolation extensions from
Did I miss something in this discussion? I thought
Ingo was quite clear, and Linus pretty clear too,
that this patch should bake in *-mm or some such
place for a bit first.
Andrew said:
The feature as a
Hi Ingo,
Thanks for your reply.
> * Linus Torvalds <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> On Wed, 6 Feb 2008, Max Krasnyansky wrote:
>>> Linus, please pull CPU isolation extensions from
>>>
>>> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/maxk/cpuisol-2.6.git
>>> for-linus
>> Have these been in -mm
* Linus Torvalds <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wed, 6 Feb 2008, Max Krasnyansky wrote:
> >
> > Linus, please pull CPU isolation extensions from
> >
> > git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/maxk/cpuisol-2.6.git
> > for-linus
>
> Have these been in -mm and widely discussed etc? I'd
On Thu, 07 Feb 2008 09:22:34 -0800 Max Krasnyansky <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > - There are two separate and identical implementations of
> > cpu_unusable(cpu). Please do it once, in a header, preferably with C
> > function, not macros.
>
> Those are local versions that depend whether a
Paul Jackson wrote:
> Max - Andrew wondered if the rt tree had seen the
> code or commented it on it. What became of that?
I just replied to Andrew. It's not an RT feature per se.
And yes Peter CC'ed RT folks. You probably did not get a chance to read all
replies.
They had some
Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Thu, 7 Feb 2008 01:59:54 -0600 Paul Jackson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> but hard real time is not my expertise
>
> Speaking of which.. there is the -rt tree. Have those people had a look
> at the feature, perhaps played with the code?
Peter Z. and Steven R. sent
Max - Andrew wondered if the rt tree had seen the
code or commented it on it. What became of that?
My two cents isn't worth a plug nickel here, but
I'm inclined to nod in agreement when Linus wants
to see these patches get some more exposure before
going into Linus's tree. ... what's the hurry?
Paul Jackson wrote:
> Andrew wrote:
>> (and bear in mind that Paul has a track record of being wrong
>> on this :))
>
> heh - I saw that .
>
> Max - Andrew's about right, as usual. You answered my initial
> questions on this patch set adequately, but hard real time is
> not my expertise, so
Hi Linus,
Linus Torvalds wrote:
>
> On Wed, 6 Feb 2008, Max Krasnyansky wrote:
>> Linus, please pull CPU isolation extensions from
>>
>> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/maxk/cpuisol-2.6.git for-linus
>
> Have these been in -mm and widely discussed etc? I'd like to start more
>
Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Wed, 06 Feb 2008 21:32:55 -0800 Max Krasnyansky <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> Linus, please pull CPU isolation extensions from
>>
>> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/maxk/cpuisol-2.6.git for-linus
>
> The feature as a whole seems useful, and I don't
On Wed, 6 Feb 2008, Max Krasnyansky wrote:
>
> Linus, please pull CPU isolation extensions from
>
> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/maxk/cpuisol-2.6.git for-linus
Have these been in -mm and widely discussed etc? I'd like to start more
carefully, and (a) have that controversial
On Thu, 7 Feb 2008 01:59:54 -0600 Paul Jackson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> but hard real time is
> not my expertise
Speaking of which.. there is the -rt tree. Have those people had a look
at the feature, perhaps played with the code?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line
Andrew wrote:
> (and bear in mind that Paul has a track record of being wrong
> on this :))
heh - I saw that .
Max - Andrew's about right, as usual. You answered my initial
questions on this patch set adequately, but hard real time is
not my expertise, so in the final analysis, other than my
On Thu, 7 Feb 2008 01:59:54 -0600 Paul Jackson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
but hard real time is
not my expertise
Speaking of which.. there is the -rt tree. Have those people had a look
at the feature, perhaps played with the code?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe
Andrew wrote:
(and bear in mind that Paul has a track record of being wrong
on this :))
heh - I saw that grin.
Max - Andrew's about right, as usual. You answered my initial
questions on this patch set adequately, but hard real time is
not my expertise, so in the final analysis, other than
Andrew Morton wrote:
On Thu, 7 Feb 2008 01:59:54 -0600 Paul Jackson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
but hard real time is not my expertise
Speaking of which.. there is the -rt tree. Have those people had a look
at the feature, perhaps played with the code?
Peter Z. and Steven R. sent me some
* Linus Torvalds [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, 6 Feb 2008, Max Krasnyansky wrote:
Linus, please pull CPU isolation extensions from
git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/maxk/cpuisol-2.6.git
for-linus
Have these been in -mm and widely discussed etc? I'd like to start
On Thu, 07 Feb 2008 09:22:34 -0800 Max Krasnyansky [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
- There are two separate and identical implementations of
cpu_unusable(cpu). Please do it once, in a header, preferably with C
function, not macros.
Those are local versions that depend whether a feature is
Hi Linus,
Linus Torvalds wrote:
On Wed, 6 Feb 2008, Max Krasnyansky wrote:
Linus, please pull CPU isolation extensions from
git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/maxk/cpuisol-2.6.git for-linus
Have these been in -mm and widely discussed etc? I'd like to start more
carefully,
Max - Andrew wondered if the rt tree had seen the
code or commented it on it. What became of that?
My two cents isn't worth a plug nickel here, but
I'm inclined to nod in agreement when Linus wants
to see these patches get some more exposure before
going into Linus's tree. ... what's the hurry?
Paul Jackson wrote:
Max - Andrew wondered if the rt tree had seen the
code or commented it on it. What became of that?
I just replied to Andrew. It's not an RT feature per se.
And yes Peter CC'ed RT folks. You probably did not get a chance to read all
replies.
They had some
Paul Jackson wrote:
Andrew wrote:
(and bear in mind that Paul has a track record of being wrong
on this :))
heh - I saw that grin.
Max - Andrew's about right, as usual. You answered my initial
questions on this patch set adequately, but hard real time is
not my expertise, so in the
Hi Ingo,
Thanks for your reply.
* Linus Torvalds [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, 6 Feb 2008, Max Krasnyansky wrote:
Linus, please pull CPU isolation extensions from
git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/maxk/cpuisol-2.6.git
for-linus
Have these been in -mm and widely discussed
On Wed, 06 Feb 2008 21:32:55 -0800 Max Krasnyansky <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Linus, please pull CPU isolation extensions from
>
> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/maxk/cpuisol-2.6.git for-linus
The feature as a whole seems useful, and I don't actually oppose the merge
based on
Linus, please pull CPU isolation extensions from
git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/maxk/cpuisol-2.6.git for-linus
Diffstat:
b/arch/x86/Kconfig |1
b/arch/x86/kernel/genapic_flat_64.c |5 ++-
b/drivers/base/cpu.c| 48
Linus, please pull CPU isolation extensions from
git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/maxk/cpuisol-2.6.git for-linus
Diffstat:
b/arch/x86/Kconfig |1
b/arch/x86/kernel/genapic_flat_64.c |5 ++-
b/drivers/base/cpu.c| 48
On Wed, 06 Feb 2008 21:32:55 -0800 Max Krasnyansky [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Linus, please pull CPU isolation extensions from
git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/maxk/cpuisol-2.6.git for-linus
The feature as a whole seems useful, and I don't actually oppose the merge
based on what I
36 matches
Mail list logo
