On Mon, Dec 15, 2014 at 04:35:29PM -0800, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> On Sun, Dec 14, 2014 at 11:17 PM, Dave Airlie wrote:
> >
> > i915:
> > Initial Skylake (SKL) support
> > gen3/4 reset work
> > start of dri1/ums removal
> > infoframe tracking
> > fixes for
On Mon, Dec 15, 2014 at 04:35:29PM -0800, Linus Torvalds wrote:
On Sun, Dec 14, 2014 at 11:17 PM, Dave Airlie airl...@linux.ie wrote:
i915:
Initial Skylake (SKL) support
gen3/4 reset work
start of dri1/ums removal
infoframe tracking
fixes for
On Tue, Dec 16, 2014 at 12:37:52PM +1000, Dave Airlie wrote:
> > Having a quiet deprecation warning with the understanding that things
> > will stay around for *years* is fine. Although it makes me wonder how
> > much value the deprecation message really adds. I mean, why the hell
> > print a
On 12/16/2014 07:18 AM, Thomas Hellstrom wrote:
> On 12/16/2014 01:35 AM, Linus Torvalds wrote:
>> On Sun, Dec 14, 2014 at 11:17 PM, Dave Airlie wrote:
>>> i915:
>>> Initial Skylake (SKL) support
>>> gen3/4 reset work
>>> start of dri1/ums removal
>>> infoframe
On 12/16/2014 01:35 AM, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> On Sun, Dec 14, 2014 at 11:17 PM, Dave Airlie wrote:
>> i915:
>> Initial Skylake (SKL) support
>> gen3/4 reset work
>> start of dri1/ums removal
>> infoframe tracking
>> fixes for lots of things.
> So I'm not
On Mon, Dec 15, 2014 at 6:37 PM, Dave Airlie wrote:
>
> Now I've no idea if this happens with SNA it probably does, but it it
> didn't then F20 is using UXA so hardly anyone at Intel would see it.
Ugh, ok. I haven't upgraded to F21 yet, and won't until the merge
window is over and my life is
> Having a quiet deprecation warning with the understanding that things
> will stay around for *years* is fine. Although it makes me wonder how
> much value the deprecation message really adds. I mean, why the hell
> print a message, when the only correct thing to do is to just look at
> and fix
On Mon, Dec 15, 2014 at 5:50 PM, Dave Airlie wrote:
>
> Now you might complain that printing anything in this case is bad,
I don't mind it if it's *one* line, and if people realize that the
commentary in the commit in question was pure and utter shit.
Because talking about how it's going to
On 16 December 2014 at 11:03, Linus Torvalds
wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 15, 2014 at 4:48 PM, Dave Airlie wrote:
>>
>> I'd be inclined to just revert this for now, it is annoying we let
>> userspace away with this, but we probably need to find a better
>> way to enforce it, since the cat is out of the
On Mon, Dec 15, 2014 at 7:48 PM, Dave Airlie wrote:
> On 16 December 2014 at 10:35, Linus Torvalds
> wrote:
>> On Sun, Dec 14, 2014 at 11:17 PM, Dave Airlie wrote:
>>>
>>> i915:
>>> Initial Skylake (SKL) support
>>> gen3/4 reset work
>>> start of dri1/ums removal
>>>
On Mon, Dec 15, 2014 at 4:48 PM, Dave Airlie wrote:
>
> I'd be inclined to just revert this for now, it is annoying we let
> userspace away with this, but we probably need to find a better
> way to enforce it, since the cat is out of the bag.
.. why did that commit ever even get far enough to
On 16 December 2014 at 10:35, Linus Torvalds
wrote:
> On Sun, Dec 14, 2014 at 11:17 PM, Dave Airlie wrote:
>>
>> i915:
>> Initial Skylake (SKL) support
>> gen3/4 reset work
>> start of dri1/ums removal
>> infoframe tracking
>> fixes for lots of things.
>
>
On Sun, Dec 14, 2014 at 11:17 PM, Dave Airlie wrote:
>
> i915:
> Initial Skylake (SKL) support
> gen3/4 reset work
> start of dri1/ums removal
> infoframe tracking
> fixes for lots of things.
So I'm not sure how happy I am about this. It seems to work, but
On Sun, Dec 14, 2014 at 11:17 PM, Dave Airlie airl...@linux.ie wrote:
i915:
Initial Skylake (SKL) support
gen3/4 reset work
start of dri1/ums removal
infoframe tracking
fixes for lots of things.
So I'm not sure how happy I am about this. It seems to
On 16 December 2014 at 10:35, Linus Torvalds
torva...@linux-foundation.org wrote:
On Sun, Dec 14, 2014 at 11:17 PM, Dave Airlie airl...@linux.ie wrote:
i915:
Initial Skylake (SKL) support
gen3/4 reset work
start of dri1/ums removal
infoframe tracking
On Mon, Dec 15, 2014 at 4:48 PM, Dave Airlie airl...@gmail.com wrote:
I'd be inclined to just revert this for now, it is annoying we let
userspace away with this, but we probably need to find a better
way to enforce it, since the cat is out of the bag.
.. why did that commit ever even get far
On Mon, Dec 15, 2014 at 7:48 PM, Dave Airlie airl...@gmail.com wrote:
On 16 December 2014 at 10:35, Linus Torvalds
torva...@linux-foundation.org wrote:
On Sun, Dec 14, 2014 at 11:17 PM, Dave Airlie airl...@linux.ie wrote:
i915:
Initial Skylake (SKL) support
gen3/4 reset work
On 16 December 2014 at 11:03, Linus Torvalds
torva...@linux-foundation.org wrote:
On Mon, Dec 15, 2014 at 4:48 PM, Dave Airlie airl...@gmail.com wrote:
I'd be inclined to just revert this for now, it is annoying we let
userspace away with this, but we probably need to find a better
way to
On Mon, Dec 15, 2014 at 5:50 PM, Dave Airlie airl...@gmail.com wrote:
Now you might complain that printing anything in this case is bad,
I don't mind it if it's *one* line, and if people realize that the
commentary in the commit in question was pure and utter shit.
Because talking about how
Having a quiet deprecation warning with the understanding that things
will stay around for *years* is fine. Although it makes me wonder how
much value the deprecation message really adds. I mean, why the hell
print a message, when the only correct thing to do is to just look at
and fix Xorg?
On Mon, Dec 15, 2014 at 6:37 PM, Dave Airlie airl...@gmail.com wrote:
Now I've no idea if this happens with SNA it probably does, but it it
didn't then F20 is using UXA so hardly anyone at Intel would see it.
Ugh, ok. I haven't upgraded to F21 yet, and won't until the merge
window is over and
On 12/16/2014 01:35 AM, Linus Torvalds wrote:
On Sun, Dec 14, 2014 at 11:17 PM, Dave Airlie airl...@linux.ie wrote:
i915:
Initial Skylake (SKL) support
gen3/4 reset work
start of dri1/ums removal
infoframe tracking
fixes for lots of things.
So I'm
On 12/16/2014 07:18 AM, Thomas Hellstrom wrote:
On 12/16/2014 01:35 AM, Linus Torvalds wrote:
On Sun, Dec 14, 2014 at 11:17 PM, Dave Airlie airl...@linux.ie wrote:
i915:
Initial Skylake (SKL) support
gen3/4 reset work
start of dri1/ums removal
infoframe
On Tue, Dec 16, 2014 at 12:37:52PM +1000, Dave Airlie wrote:
Having a quiet deprecation warning with the understanding that things
will stay around for *years* is fine. Although it makes me wonder how
much value the deprecation message really adds. I mean, why the hell
print a message,
Hi Linus,
This is the main drm pull, as explained this was queued behind arm soc and
iommu, the diffstat seems confused which worries me always, but I've git pull'ed
this tree into yours and gotten a minor conflict in mm/hugetlb.c, which is
easily solved. The -mm changes from the AMD HSA
Hi Linus,
This is the main drm pull, as explained this was queued behind arm soc and
iommu, the diffstat seems confused which worries me always, but I've git pull'ed
this tree into yours and gotten a minor conflict in mm/hugetlb.c, which is
easily solved. The -mm changes from the AMD HSA
26 matches
Mail list logo
