Re: [git pull] drm merge for 3.9-rc1

2013-03-05 Thread Daniel Vetter
On Tue, Feb 26, 2013 at 05:39:46PM -0800, Linus Torvalds wrote: > On Mon, Feb 25, 2013 at 4:05 PM, Dave Airlie wrote: > > > > Highlights: > > > > i915: all over the map, haswell power well enhancements, valleyview macro > > horrors cleaned up, killing lots of legacy GTT > > code, > > Lowlight:

Re: [Intel-gfx] [git pull] drm merge for 3.9-rc1

2013-03-05 Thread Imre Deak
On Thu, 2013-02-28 at 11:31 -0300, Paulo Zanoni wrote: > Hi > > 2013/2/28 Chris Wilson : > > On Thu, Feb 28, 2013 at 12:06:28AM +0100, Sedat Dilek wrote: > >> On Wed, Feb 27, 2013 at 11:36 PM, Sedat Dilek > >> wrote: > >> > Hi, > >> > > >> > I am seeing this also on Linux-Next. > >> > > >> >

Re: [git pull] drm merge for 3.9-rc1

2013-03-05 Thread Alex Deucher
On Tue, Mar 5, 2013 at 10:21 AM, Josh Boyer wrote: > On Thu, Feb 28, 2013 at 1:59 PM, Josh Boyer wrote: >> On Thu, Feb 28, 2013 at 10:15 AM, Josh Boyer wrote: >>> On Thu, Feb 28, 2013 at 10:09 AM, Alex Deucher >>> wrote: On Thu, Feb 28, 2013 at 8:44 AM, Josh Boyer wrote: > On Thu,

Re: [git pull] drm merge for 3.9-rc1

2013-03-05 Thread Josh Boyer
On Thu, Feb 28, 2013 at 1:59 PM, Josh Boyer wrote: > On Thu, Feb 28, 2013 at 10:15 AM, Josh Boyer wrote: >> On Thu, Feb 28, 2013 at 10:09 AM, Alex Deucher wrote: >>> On Thu, Feb 28, 2013 at 8:44 AM, Josh Boyer wrote: On Thu, Feb 28, 2013 at 8:38 AM, Alex Deucher wrote: >

Re: [git pull] drm merge for 3.9-rc1

2013-03-05 Thread Josh Boyer
On Thu, Feb 28, 2013 at 1:59 PM, Josh Boyer jwbo...@gmail.com wrote: On Thu, Feb 28, 2013 at 10:15 AM, Josh Boyer jwbo...@gmail.com wrote: On Thu, Feb 28, 2013 at 10:09 AM, Alex Deucher alexdeuc...@gmail.com wrote: On Thu, Feb 28, 2013 at 8:44 AM, Josh Boyer jwbo...@gmail.com wrote: On Thu,

Re: [git pull] drm merge for 3.9-rc1

2013-03-05 Thread Alex Deucher
On Tue, Mar 5, 2013 at 10:21 AM, Josh Boyer jwbo...@gmail.com wrote: On Thu, Feb 28, 2013 at 1:59 PM, Josh Boyer jwbo...@gmail.com wrote: On Thu, Feb 28, 2013 at 10:15 AM, Josh Boyer jwbo...@gmail.com wrote: On Thu, Feb 28, 2013 at 10:09 AM, Alex Deucher alexdeuc...@gmail.com wrote: On Thu,

Re: [Intel-gfx] [git pull] drm merge for 3.9-rc1

2013-03-05 Thread Imre Deak
On Thu, 2013-02-28 at 11:31 -0300, Paulo Zanoni wrote: Hi 2013/2/28 Chris Wilson ch...@chris-wilson.co.uk: On Thu, Feb 28, 2013 at 12:06:28AM +0100, Sedat Dilek wrote: On Wed, Feb 27, 2013 at 11:36 PM, Sedat Dilek sedat.di...@gmail.com wrote: Hi, I am seeing this also on

Re: [git pull] drm merge for 3.9-rc1

2013-03-05 Thread Daniel Vetter
On Tue, Feb 26, 2013 at 05:39:46PM -0800, Linus Torvalds wrote: On Mon, Feb 25, 2013 at 4:05 PM, Dave Airlie airl...@linux.ie wrote: Highlights: i915: all over the map, haswell power well enhancements, valleyview macro horrors cleaned up, killing lots of legacy GTT code, Lowlight:

Re: [git pull] drm merge for 3.9-rc1

2013-03-03 Thread Azat Khuzhin
On Wed, Feb 27, 2013 at 5:39 AM, Linus Torvalds wrote: > On Mon, Feb 25, 2013 at 4:05 PM, Dave Airlie wrote: >> >> Highlights: >> >> i915: all over the map, haswell power well enhancements, valleyview macro >> horrors cleaned up, killing lots of legacy GTT >> code, > > Lowlight: > > There's

Re: [git pull] drm merge for 3.9-rc1

2013-03-03 Thread Azat Khuzhin
On Wed, Feb 27, 2013 at 5:39 AM, Linus Torvalds torva...@linux-foundation.org wrote: On Mon, Feb 25, 2013 at 4:05 PM, Dave Airlie airl...@linux.ie wrote: Highlights: i915: all over the map, haswell power well enhancements, valleyview macro horrors cleaned up, killing lots of legacy GTT

Re: [Intel-gfx] [git pull] drm merge for 3.9-rc1

2013-03-01 Thread Sedat Dilek
On Thu, Feb 28, 2013 at 6:59 PM, Sedat Dilek wrote: > On Thu, Feb 28, 2013 at 6:33 PM, Paulo Zanoni wrote: >> Hi >> >> 2013/2/28 Sedat Dilek : >>> On Thu, Feb 28, 2013 at 6:12 PM, Sedat Dilek wrote: On Thu, Feb 28, 2013 at 3:31 PM, Paulo Zanoni wrote: > Hi > > 2013/2/28 Chris

Re: [Intel-gfx] [git pull] drm merge for 3.9-rc1

2013-03-01 Thread Sedat Dilek
On Thu, Feb 28, 2013 at 6:59 PM, Sedat Dilek sedat.di...@gmail.com wrote: On Thu, Feb 28, 2013 at 6:33 PM, Paulo Zanoni przan...@gmail.com wrote: Hi 2013/2/28 Sedat Dilek sedat.di...@gmail.com: On Thu, Feb 28, 2013 at 6:12 PM, Sedat Dilek sedat.di...@gmail.com wrote: On Thu, Feb 28, 2013 at

Re: [git pull] drm merge for 3.9-rc1

2013-02-28 Thread Josh Boyer
On Thu, Feb 28, 2013 at 10:15 AM, Josh Boyer wrote: > On Thu, Feb 28, 2013 at 10:09 AM, Alex Deucher wrote: >> On Thu, Feb 28, 2013 at 8:44 AM, Josh Boyer wrote: >>> On Thu, Feb 28, 2013 at 8:38 AM, Alex Deucher wrote: ca57802e521de54341efc8a56f70571f79ffac72 is the first bad commit

Re: [Intel-gfx] [git pull] drm merge for 3.9-rc1

2013-02-28 Thread Sedat Dilek
On Thu, Feb 28, 2013 at 6:33 PM, Paulo Zanoni wrote: > Hi > > 2013/2/28 Sedat Dilek : >> On Thu, Feb 28, 2013 at 6:12 PM, Sedat Dilek wrote: >>> On Thu, Feb 28, 2013 at 3:31 PM, Paulo Zanoni wrote: Hi 2013/2/28 Chris Wilson : > On Thu, Feb 28, 2013 at 12:06:28AM +0100, Sedat

Re: [Intel-gfx] [git pull] drm merge for 3.9-rc1

2013-02-28 Thread Paulo Zanoni
Hi 2013/2/28 Sedat Dilek : > On Thu, Feb 28, 2013 at 6:12 PM, Sedat Dilek wrote: >> On Thu, Feb 28, 2013 at 3:31 PM, Paulo Zanoni wrote: >>> Hi >>> >>> 2013/2/28 Chris Wilson : On Thu, Feb 28, 2013 at 12:06:28AM +0100, Sedat Dilek wrote: > On Wed, Feb 27, 2013 at 11:36 PM, Sedat Dilek

Re: [Intel-gfx] [git pull] drm merge for 3.9-rc1

2013-02-28 Thread Sedat Dilek
On Thu, Feb 28, 2013 at 6:12 PM, Sedat Dilek wrote: > On Thu, Feb 28, 2013 at 3:31 PM, Paulo Zanoni wrote: >> Hi >> >> 2013/2/28 Chris Wilson : >>> On Thu, Feb 28, 2013 at 12:06:28AM +0100, Sedat Dilek wrote: On Wed, Feb 27, 2013 at 11:36 PM, Sedat Dilek wrote: > Hi, >

Re: [Intel-gfx] [git pull] drm merge for 3.9-rc1

2013-02-28 Thread Sedat Dilek
On Thu, Feb 28, 2013 at 3:31 PM, Paulo Zanoni wrote: > Hi > > 2013/2/28 Chris Wilson : >> On Thu, Feb 28, 2013 at 12:06:28AM +0100, Sedat Dilek wrote: >>> On Wed, Feb 27, 2013 at 11:36 PM, Sedat Dilek wrote: >>> > Hi, >>> > >>> > I am seeing this also on Linux-Next. >>> > >>> >

Re: [git pull] drm merge for 3.9-rc1

2013-02-28 Thread Sedat Dilek
On Thu, Feb 28, 2013 at 12:18 PM, Chris Wilson wrote: > On Thu, Feb 28, 2013 at 12:06:28AM +0100, Sedat Dilek wrote: >> On Wed, Feb 27, 2013 at 11:36 PM, Sedat Dilek wrote: >> > Hi, >> > >> > I am seeing this also on Linux-Next. >> > >> > /var/log/kern.log:Feb 27 22:52:35 fambox kernel: [

Re: [git pull] drm merge for 3.9-rc1

2013-02-28 Thread Josh Boyer
On Thu, Feb 28, 2013 at 10:09 AM, Alex Deucher wrote: > On Thu, Feb 28, 2013 at 8:44 AM, Josh Boyer wrote: >> On Thu, Feb 28, 2013 at 8:38 AM, Alex Deucher wrote: >>> ca57802e521de54341efc8a56f70571f79ffac72 is the first bad commit >> >> So I don't think that's actually the cause of

Re: [Intel-gfx] [git pull] drm merge for 3.9-rc1

2013-02-28 Thread Paulo Zanoni
Hi 2013/2/28 Chris Wilson : > On Thu, Feb 28, 2013 at 12:06:28AM +0100, Sedat Dilek wrote: >> On Wed, Feb 27, 2013 at 11:36 PM, Sedat Dilek wrote: >> > Hi, >> > >> > I am seeing this also on Linux-Next. >> > >> > /var/log/kern.log:Feb 27 22:52:35 fambox kernel: [ 28.202381] >> >

Re: [git pull] drm merge for 3.9-rc1

2013-02-28 Thread Chris Wilson
On Thu, Feb 28, 2013 at 12:06:28AM +0100, Sedat Dilek wrote: > On Wed, Feb 27, 2013 at 11:36 PM, Sedat Dilek wrote: > > Hi, > > > > I am seeing this also on Linux-Next. > > > > /var/log/kern.log:Feb 27 22:52:35 fambox kernel: [ 28.202381] > > [drm:intel_dp_aux_wait_done] *ERROR* dp aux hw did

Re: [git pull] drm merge for 3.9-rc1

2013-02-28 Thread Chris Wilson
On Thu, Feb 28, 2013 at 12:06:28AM +0100, Sedat Dilek wrote: On Wed, Feb 27, 2013 at 11:36 PM, Sedat Dilek sedat.di...@gmail.com wrote: Hi, I am seeing this also on Linux-Next. /var/log/kern.log:Feb 27 22:52:35 fambox kernel: [ 28.202381] [drm:intel_dp_aux_wait_done] *ERROR* dp aux

Re: [Intel-gfx] [git pull] drm merge for 3.9-rc1

2013-02-28 Thread Paulo Zanoni
Hi 2013/2/28 Chris Wilson ch...@chris-wilson.co.uk: On Thu, Feb 28, 2013 at 12:06:28AM +0100, Sedat Dilek wrote: On Wed, Feb 27, 2013 at 11:36 PM, Sedat Dilek sedat.di...@gmail.com wrote: Hi, I am seeing this also on Linux-Next. /var/log/kern.log:Feb 27 22:52:35 fambox kernel: [

Re: [git pull] drm merge for 3.9-rc1

2013-02-28 Thread Josh Boyer
On Thu, Feb 28, 2013 at 10:09 AM, Alex Deucher alexdeuc...@gmail.com wrote: On Thu, Feb 28, 2013 at 8:44 AM, Josh Boyer jwbo...@gmail.com wrote: On Thu, Feb 28, 2013 at 8:38 AM, Alex Deucher alexdeuc...@gmail.com wrote: ca57802e521de54341efc8a56f70571f79ffac72 is the first bad commit So I

Re: [git pull] drm merge for 3.9-rc1

2013-02-28 Thread Sedat Dilek
On Thu, Feb 28, 2013 at 12:18 PM, Chris Wilson ch...@chris-wilson.co.uk wrote: On Thu, Feb 28, 2013 at 12:06:28AM +0100, Sedat Dilek wrote: On Wed, Feb 27, 2013 at 11:36 PM, Sedat Dilek sedat.di...@gmail.com wrote: Hi, I am seeing this also on Linux-Next. /var/log/kern.log:Feb 27

Re: [Intel-gfx] [git pull] drm merge for 3.9-rc1

2013-02-28 Thread Sedat Dilek
On Thu, Feb 28, 2013 at 3:31 PM, Paulo Zanoni przan...@gmail.com wrote: Hi 2013/2/28 Chris Wilson ch...@chris-wilson.co.uk: On Thu, Feb 28, 2013 at 12:06:28AM +0100, Sedat Dilek wrote: On Wed, Feb 27, 2013 at 11:36 PM, Sedat Dilek sedat.di...@gmail.com wrote: Hi, I am seeing this also

Re: [Intel-gfx] [git pull] drm merge for 3.9-rc1

2013-02-28 Thread Sedat Dilek
On Thu, Feb 28, 2013 at 6:12 PM, Sedat Dilek sedat.di...@gmail.com wrote: On Thu, Feb 28, 2013 at 3:31 PM, Paulo Zanoni przan...@gmail.com wrote: Hi 2013/2/28 Chris Wilson ch...@chris-wilson.co.uk: On Thu, Feb 28, 2013 at 12:06:28AM +0100, Sedat Dilek wrote: On Wed, Feb 27, 2013 at 11:36 PM,

Re: [Intel-gfx] [git pull] drm merge for 3.9-rc1

2013-02-28 Thread Paulo Zanoni
Hi 2013/2/28 Sedat Dilek sedat.di...@gmail.com: On Thu, Feb 28, 2013 at 6:12 PM, Sedat Dilek sedat.di...@gmail.com wrote: On Thu, Feb 28, 2013 at 3:31 PM, Paulo Zanoni przan...@gmail.com wrote: Hi 2013/2/28 Chris Wilson ch...@chris-wilson.co.uk: On Thu, Feb 28, 2013 at 12:06:28AM +0100,

Re: [Intel-gfx] [git pull] drm merge for 3.9-rc1

2013-02-28 Thread Sedat Dilek
On Thu, Feb 28, 2013 at 6:33 PM, Paulo Zanoni przan...@gmail.com wrote: Hi 2013/2/28 Sedat Dilek sedat.di...@gmail.com: On Thu, Feb 28, 2013 at 6:12 PM, Sedat Dilek sedat.di...@gmail.com wrote: On Thu, Feb 28, 2013 at 3:31 PM, Paulo Zanoni przan...@gmail.com wrote: Hi 2013/2/28 Chris

Re: [git pull] drm merge for 3.9-rc1

2013-02-28 Thread Josh Boyer
On Thu, Feb 28, 2013 at 10:15 AM, Josh Boyer jwbo...@gmail.com wrote: On Thu, Feb 28, 2013 at 10:09 AM, Alex Deucher alexdeuc...@gmail.com wrote: On Thu, Feb 28, 2013 at 8:44 AM, Josh Boyer jwbo...@gmail.com wrote: On Thu, Feb 28, 2013 at 8:38 AM, Alex Deucher alexdeuc...@gmail.com wrote:

Re: [git pull] drm merge for 3.9-rc1

2013-02-27 Thread Sedat Dilek
On Wed, Feb 27, 2013 at 11:36 PM, Sedat Dilek wrote: > Hi, > > I am seeing this also on Linux-Next. > > /var/log/kern.log:Feb 27 22:52:35 fambox kernel: [ 28.202381] > [drm:intel_dp_aux_wait_done] *ERROR* dp aux hw did not signal timeout > (has irq: 1)! > /var/log/kern.log:Feb 27 22:52:35

Re: [git pull] drm merge for 3.9-rc1

2013-02-27 Thread Sedat Dilek
Hi, I am seeing this also on Linux-Next. /var/log/kern.log:Feb 27 22:52:35 fambox kernel: [ 28.202381] [drm:intel_dp_aux_wait_done] *ERROR* dp aux hw did not signal timeout (has irq: 1)! /var/log/kern.log:Feb 27 22:52:35 fambox kernel: [ 28.210588] [drm:intel_dp_aux_wait_done] *ERROR* dp aux

Re: [git pull] drm merge for 3.9-rc1

2013-02-27 Thread Chris Wilson
On Tue, Feb 26, 2013 at 05:39:46PM -0800, Linus Torvalds wrote: > On Mon, Feb 25, 2013 at 4:05 PM, Dave Airlie wrote: > > > > Highlights: > > > > i915: all over the map, haswell power well enhancements, valleyview macro > > horrors cleaned up, killing lots of legacy GTT > > code, > > Lowlight:

Re: [git pull] drm merge for 3.9-rc1

2013-02-27 Thread Chris Wilson
On Tue, Feb 26, 2013 at 05:39:46PM -0800, Linus Torvalds wrote: On Mon, Feb 25, 2013 at 4:05 PM, Dave Airlie airl...@linux.ie wrote: Highlights: i915: all over the map, haswell power well enhancements, valleyview macro horrors cleaned up, killing lots of legacy GTT code, Lowlight:

Re: [git pull] drm merge for 3.9-rc1

2013-02-27 Thread Sedat Dilek
Hi, I am seeing this also on Linux-Next. /var/log/kern.log:Feb 27 22:52:35 fambox kernel: [ 28.202381] [drm:intel_dp_aux_wait_done] *ERROR* dp aux hw did not signal timeout (has irq: 1)! /var/log/kern.log:Feb 27 22:52:35 fambox kernel: [ 28.210588] [drm:intel_dp_aux_wait_done] *ERROR* dp aux

Re: [git pull] drm merge for 3.9-rc1

2013-02-27 Thread Sedat Dilek
On Wed, Feb 27, 2013 at 11:36 PM, Sedat Dilek sedat.di...@gmail.com wrote: Hi, I am seeing this also on Linux-Next. /var/log/kern.log:Feb 27 22:52:35 fambox kernel: [ 28.202381] [drm:intel_dp_aux_wait_done] *ERROR* dp aux hw did not signal timeout (has irq: 1)! /var/log/kern.log:Feb 27

Re: [git pull] drm merge for 3.9-rc1

2013-02-26 Thread Linus Torvalds
On Tue, Feb 26, 2013 at 7:30 PM, Dave Airlie wrote: > > If you want to just bump it so Ironlake isn't affected, (patch attached). It works fine 95% of the time and isn't a hard failure when it doesn't, so this isn't critical. I can wait for it to be fixed a while. > Is this external DP monitor

Re: [git pull] drm merge for 3.9-rc1

2013-02-26 Thread Dave Airlie
On Wed, Feb 27, 2013 at 11:39 AM, Linus Torvalds wrote: > On Mon, Feb 25, 2013 at 4:05 PM, Dave Airlie wrote: >> >> Highlights: >> >> i915: all over the map, haswell power well enhancements, valleyview macro >> horrors cleaned up, killing lots of legacy GTT >> code, > > Lowlight: > > There's

Re: [git pull] drm merge for 3.9-rc1

2013-02-26 Thread Linus Torvalds
On Tue, Feb 26, 2013 at 5:39 PM, Linus Torvalds wrote: > > Lowlight: > > [5.710827] [drm:intel_dp_aux_wait_done] *ERROR* dp aux hw did not > signal timeout (has irq: 1)! Oh, forgot to mention - this is my trusty old Westmere chip (aka "Core i5-670", aka Clarkdale, aka

Re: [git pull] drm merge for 3.9-rc1

2013-02-26 Thread Linus Torvalds
On Mon, Feb 25, 2013 at 4:05 PM, Dave Airlie wrote: > > Highlights: > > i915: all over the map, haswell power well enhancements, valleyview macro > horrors cleaned up, killing lots of legacy GTT > code, Lowlight: There's something wrong with i915 DP detection or whatever. I get stuff like

Re: [git pull] drm merge for 3.9-rc1

2013-02-26 Thread Linus Torvalds
On Mon, Feb 25, 2013 at 4:05 PM, Dave Airlie airl...@linux.ie wrote: Highlights: i915: all over the map, haswell power well enhancements, valleyview macro horrors cleaned up, killing lots of legacy GTT code, Lowlight: There's something wrong with i915 DP detection or whatever. I get stuff

Re: [git pull] drm merge for 3.9-rc1

2013-02-26 Thread Linus Torvalds
On Tue, Feb 26, 2013 at 5:39 PM, Linus Torvalds torva...@linux-foundation.org wrote: Lowlight: [5.710827] [drm:intel_dp_aux_wait_done] *ERROR* dp aux hw did not signal timeout (has irq: 1)! Oh, forgot to mention - this is my trusty old Westmere chip (aka Core i5-670, aka Clarkdale, aka

Re: [git pull] drm merge for 3.9-rc1

2013-02-26 Thread Dave Airlie
On Wed, Feb 27, 2013 at 11:39 AM, Linus Torvalds torva...@linux-foundation.org wrote: On Mon, Feb 25, 2013 at 4:05 PM, Dave Airlie airl...@linux.ie wrote: Highlights: i915: all over the map, haswell power well enhancements, valleyview macro horrors cleaned up, killing lots of legacy GTT

Re: [git pull] drm merge for 3.9-rc1

2013-02-26 Thread Linus Torvalds
On Tue, Feb 26, 2013 at 7:30 PM, Dave Airlie airl...@gmail.com wrote: If you want to just bump it so Ironlake isn't affected, (patch attached). It works fine 95% of the time and isn't a hard failure when it doesn't, so this isn't critical. I can wait for it to be fixed a while. Is this

Re: [git pull] drm merge for 3.9-rc1

2013-02-25 Thread Dave Airlie
> > I did the fun conflict resolution, so my tree doesn't have the ordering > changes. > > I also did some things slightly differently from you - you had left > some direct ib[] accesses that I spotted (see for example "case 0x48" > (aka "Copy L2T Frame to Field"), and yours apparently has a few

Re: [git pull] drm merge for 3.9-rc1

2013-02-25 Thread Linus Torvalds
On Mon, Feb 25, 2013 at 4:05 PM, Dave Airlie wrote: > > So up front, this has a massive merge conflict in > drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/evergreen_cs.c I've fixed it up in drm-next-merged > in the same tree, I fixed up some small ordering issues in my merge as > well, however they aren't important if

Re: [git pull] drm merge for 3.9-rc1

2013-02-25 Thread Linus Torvalds
On Mon, Feb 25, 2013 at 4:05 PM, Dave Airlie airl...@linux.ie wrote: So up front, this has a massive merge conflict in drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/evergreen_cs.c I've fixed it up in drm-next-merged in the same tree, I fixed up some small ordering issues in my merge as well, however they aren't

Re: [git pull] drm merge for 3.9-rc1

2013-02-25 Thread Dave Airlie
I did the fun conflict resolution, so my tree doesn't have the ordering changes. I also did some things slightly differently from you - you had left some direct ib[] accesses that I spotted (see for example case 0x48 (aka Copy L2T Frame to Field), and yours apparently has a few cases