Dmitry Adamushko wrote:
> [ cc'ed Srivatsa ]
>
> On 17/10/2007, Gabriel C <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Ingo Molnar wrote:
>> [15692.917111] BUG: unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at
>> virtual address 0044
>> ...
>> [15692.917629] EFLAGS: 00010046 (2.6.23-g65a6ec0d #330)
>>
[ cc'ed Srivatsa ]
On 17/10/2007, Gabriel C <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Ingo Molnar wrote:
> [15692.917111] BUG: unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at
> virtual address 0044
> ...
> [15692.917629] EFLAGS: 00010046 (2.6.23-g65a6ec0d #330)
> [15692.917661] EIP is at pick_next_t
On 15/10/2007, Ingo Molnar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> * Andrew Morton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > On Mon, 15 Oct 2007 16:17:23 +0200
> > Ingo Molnar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > > Linus, please pull the latest scheduler git tree from:
> > >
> > >git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux
Ingo Molnar wrote:
> * Andrew Morton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> On Mon, 15 Oct 2007 16:17:23 +0200
>> Ingo Molnar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>>> Linus, please pull the latest scheduler git tree from:
>>>
>>>git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/mingo/linux-2.6-sched.git
>> Did
Ingo Molnar skrev:
* Ingo Molnar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
* Thomas Backlund <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
How does this one compare to the v22 you released earlier ?
v22 has most of it included.
OK, that's what I thought
I'm thinking of backporting any fixes/optimizations to 2.6.22 (and
* Ingo Molnar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> * Thomas Backlund <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > How does this one compare to the v22 you released earlier ?
>
> v22 has most of it included.
>
> > I'm thinking of backporting any fixes/optimizations to 2.6.22 (and
> > possibly 2.6.23)
>
> i have
Ingo Molnar skrev:
Linus, please pull the latest scheduler git tree from:
git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/mingo/linux-2.6-sched.git
It contains lots of scheduler updates from lots of people - hopefully
the last big one for quite some time. Most of the focus was on
performance
* Thomas Backlund <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> How does this one compare to the v22 you released earlier ?
v22 has most of it included.
> I'm thinking of backporting any fixes/optimizations to 2.6.22 (and
> possibly 2.6.23)
i have already backported it as v22.1 - will release it within a few
On Tuesday 16 October 2007 00:17, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> Linus, please pull the latest scheduler git tree from:
>
>git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/mingo/linux-2.6-sched.git
>
> It contains lots of scheduler updates from lots of people - hopefully
> the last big one for quite some ti
* Andrew Morton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Mon, 15 Oct 2007 16:17:23 +0200
> Ingo Molnar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Linus, please pull the latest scheduler git tree from:
> >
> >git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/mingo/linux-2.6-sched.git
>
> Did Paul Jackson's crash
On Mon, 15 Oct 2007 16:17:23 +0200
Ingo Molnar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Linus, please pull the latest scheduler git tree from:
>
>git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/mingo/linux-2.6-sched.git
Did Paul Jackson's crash get fixed?
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "un
* Ingo Molnar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Linus, please pull the latest scheduler git tree from:
>
>git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/mingo/linux-2.6-sched.git
oops, these two cleanups caused build failures in some config variants:
> sched: reduce balance-tasks overhead
Linus, please pull the latest scheduler git tree from:
git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/mingo/linux-2.6-sched.git
It contains lots of scheduler updates from lots of people - hopefully
the last big one for quite some time. Most of the focus was on
performance (both micro-perform
13 matches
Mail list logo
