On 06/05/07 23:50, Trent Piepho wrote:
I've tested this and can confirm it works. dvb_class will be set too late
without the change to subsys_initcall.
On Tue, 1 May 2007, Simon Arlott wrote:
dvb-core is not started early enough when device drivers that use dvb are
compiled in so device_regist
I've tested this and can confirm it works. dvb_class will be set too late
without the change to subsys_initcall.
On Tue, 1 May 2007, Simon Arlott wrote:
> dvb-core is not started early enough when device drivers that use dvb are
> compiled in so device_register_device fails (silently) since dvb_c
dvb-core is not started early enough when device drivers that use dvb are
compiled in so device_register_device fails (silently) since dvb_class is
NULL, this runs dvb_init using subsys_initcall instead of module_init.
dvb_register_device will now check the return value of class_device_create.
On Tue, 1 May 2007, Simon Arlott wrote:
> dvb-core is not started early enough when device drivers that use dvb are
> compiled in so device_register_device fails (silently) since dvb_class is
> NULL, this runs dvb_init using subsys_initclass instead of module_init.
>
> dvb_register_device will now
4 matches
Mail list logo