Trent Piepho wrote:
> This is not correct. The dvb_attach() system has no assumption that it will
> be used for a front-end device. There are already users which are not
> front-ends, such as tuners or lnb supply control chips,
SEC (aka Satellite Equipment Control) is a part of the frontend.
On Wed, 2 May 2007, Manu Abraham wrote:
> > I've been aware of the problem with dst not fully using the dvb
> > customization
> > systems(*) for a long time. It came up when dvb_attach() et al were first
> > being integrated, well before any rejected patches or strongly worded emails
> > or
Original-Nachricht
Datum: Mon, 07 May 2007 17:54:29 -0300
Von: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
An: Manu Abraham <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
CC: [EMAIL PROTECTED], linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Betreff: Re: [linux-dvb] DST/BT878 module customization (.. w
Michael Krufky wrote:
> Manu Abraham wrote:
>> Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote:
>>> Hi Manu,
>>>
From my side, quite some time has been put forward to write that mail.
Inspite of that if you feel that you do have to go your own way, then
it is completely upto you. I would say: do as you
Manu Abraham wrote:
> Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote:
>> Hi Manu,
>>
>>> From my side, quite some time has been put forward to write that mail.
>>> Inspite of that if you feel that you do have to go your own way, then
>>> it is completely upto you. I would say: do as you feel in such a case.
>> The
Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote:
> Hi Manu,
>
>> From my side, quite some time has been put forward to write that mail.
>> Inspite of that if you feel that you do have to go your own way, then
>> it is completely upto you. I would say: do as you feel in such a case.
>
> The point is that those
Hi Manu,
> From my side, quite some time has been put forward to write that mail.
> Inspite of that if you feel that you do have to go your own way, then
> it is completely upto you. I would say: do as you feel in such a case.
The point is that those issues are pending for a long time, and they
Hi Manu,
From my side, quite some time has been put forward to write that mail.
Inspite of that if you feel that you do have to go your own way, then
it is completely upto you. I would say: do as you feel in such a case.
The point is that those issues are pending for a long time, and they
Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote:
Hi Manu,
From my side, quite some time has been put forward to write that mail.
Inspite of that if you feel that you do have to go your own way, then
it is completely upto you. I would say: do as you feel in such a case.
The point is that those issues are
Manu Abraham wrote:
Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote:
Hi Manu,
From my side, quite some time has been put forward to write that mail.
Inspite of that if you feel that you do have to go your own way, then
it is completely upto you. I would say: do as you feel in such a case.
The point is that
Michael Krufky wrote:
Manu Abraham wrote:
Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote:
Hi Manu,
From my side, quite some time has been put forward to write that mail.
Inspite of that if you feel that you do have to go your own way, then
it is completely upto you. I would say: do as you feel in such a case.
Original-Nachricht
Datum: Mon, 07 May 2007 17:54:29 -0300
Von: Mauro Carvalho Chehab [EMAIL PROTECTED]
An: Manu Abraham [EMAIL PROTECTED]
CC: [EMAIL PROTECTED], linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Betreff: Re: [linux-dvb] DST/BT878 module customization (.. was: Critical
points
On Wed, 2 May 2007, Manu Abraham wrote:
I've been aware of the problem with dst not fully using the dvb
customization
systems(*) for a long time. It came up when dvb_attach() et al were first
being integrated, well before any rejected patches or strongly worded emails
or whatever from
Trent Piepho wrote:
This is not correct. The dvb_attach() system has no assumption that it will
be used for a front-end device. There are already users which are not
front-ends, such as tuners or lnb supply control chips,
SEC (aka Satellite Equipment Control) is a part of the frontend.
Hello Mauro,
Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote:
> Hi Manu,
>
> Em Qui, 2007-05-03 às 23:03 +0400, Manu Abraham escreveu:
>> Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote:
>>> Enough. Let's stop arguing non technical issues.
>>>
>>> If either one of you have any technical argue against the Trent's
>>> patches, please
Hi Manu,
Em Qui, 2007-05-03 às 23:03 +0400, Manu Abraham escreveu:
> Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote:
> > Enough. Let's stop arguing non technical issues.
> >
> > If either one of you have any technical argue against the Trent's
> > patches, please point where the fix is wrong. Otherwise, if you
Hi Manu,
Em Qui, 2007-05-03 às 23:03 +0400, Manu Abraham escreveu:
Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote:
Enough. Let's stop arguing non technical issues.
If either one of you have any technical argue against the Trent's
patches, please point where the fix is wrong. Otherwise, if you wish,
you
Hello Mauro,
Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote:
Hi Manu,
Em Qui, 2007-05-03 às 23:03 +0400, Manu Abraham escreveu:
Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote:
Enough. Let's stop arguing non technical issues.
If either one of you have any technical argue against the Trent's
patches, please point where the fix
Original-Nachricht
Datum: Fri, 04 May 2007 02:31:49 +0400
Von: Manu Abraham <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
An: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
CC: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Betreff: Re: [linux-dvb] DST/BT878 module customization (.. was: Critical
points about ...)
> Markus Rechber
Am Freitag, den 04.05.2007, 02:31 +0400 schrieb Manu Abraham:
> Markus Rechberger wrote:
>
> > I mean the mail from Helge Hafting (thread [linux-dvb] Critical
> > points about kernel 2.6.21 and pseudo-authorities) at the very first
> > beginning.
> >
>
> I am replying to this mail, just
Original-Nachricht
Datum: Fri, 4 May 2007 00:06:51 +0200
Von: "Markus Rechberger" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
An: "Manu Abraham" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
CC: [EMAIL PROTECTED], linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Betreff: Re: [linux-dvb] DST/BT878 module
On 5/4/07, Manu Abraham <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Markus Rechberger wrote:
> I mean the mail from Helge Hafting (thread [linux-dvb] Critical
> points about kernel 2.6.21 and pseudo-authorities) at the very first
> beginning.
>
I am replying to this mail, just because someone's spreading lies
Markus Rechberger wrote:
> I mean the mail from Helge Hafting (thread [linux-dvb] Critical
> points about kernel 2.6.21 and pseudo-authorities) at the very first
> beginning.
>
I am replying to this mail, just because someone's spreading lies all
around.
On the mentioned thread, what i wrote
On 5/3/07, Manu Abraham <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Markus Rechberger wrote:
> On 5/3/07, Manu Abraham <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote:
>> > Enough. Let's stop arguing non technical issues.
>> >
>> > If either one of you have any technical argue against the Trent's
>> >
Markus Rechberger wrote:
> On 5/3/07, Manu Abraham <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote:
>> > Enough. Let's stop arguing non technical issues.
>> >
>> > If either one of you have any technical argue against the Trent's
>> > patches, please point where the fix is wrong.
On 5/3/07, Manu Abraham <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote:
> Enough. Let's stop arguing non technical issues.
>
> If either one of you have any technical argue against the Trent's
> patches, please point where the fix is wrong. Otherwise, if you wish,
> you may send an
On 5/3/07, VDR User <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
STOP FIGHTING ALL THE DAMN TIME! From an outsiders perspective there
is a lot of unnecessary & childish behavior going on at the expense of
good ideas and coding. It seems as though the Markus/Mauro team will
go against anything Manu says simply
Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote:
> Enough. Let's stop arguing non technical issues.
>
> If either one of you have any technical argue against the Trent's
> patches, please point where the fix is wrong. Otherwise, if you wish,
> you may send an acked-by agreeing with the fix.
>
Why don't you stop
On 5/3/07, Manu Abraham <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Markus Rechberger wrote:
> Manu,
>
> to me it looks like your attitude is not acceptable here, I sent
> several mails already which you just use to ignore.
You very well know the reason why i am ignoring your mails. You just
tend to flame
Michael Krufky wrote:
> Manu Abraham wrote:
>> Uwe Bugla wrote:
>>
>>> If you download the thing as tar.bz2 you get a zero file down.
>>>
>> I think could be a bug in hgweb probably.
> [snip]
>> Let me see why hgweb gives a zero length archive
>>
> Manu,
>
> We reported this bug to the
Manu Abraham wrote:
> Uwe Bugla wrote:
>
>> If you download the thing as tar.bz2 you get a zero file down.
>>
>
> I think could be a bug in hgweb probably.
[snip]
> Let me see why hgweb gives a zero length archive
>
Manu,
We reported this bug to the selenic guys quite a long time
rg, [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL
PROTECTED]
Betreff: Re: [linux-dvb] DST/BT878 module customization (.. was: Critical
points about ...)
> On 5/3/07, Manu Abraham <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Uwe Bugla wrote:
> >
> > > Hi Manu,
> > >
> > &g
Markus Rechberger wrote:
> Manu,
>
> to me it looks like your attitude is not acceptable here, I sent
> several mails already which you just use to ignore.
You very well know the reason why i am ignoring your mails. You just
tend to flame people for nothing. I tend to ignore the flamers.
> If
ED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Betreff: Re: [linux-dvb] DST/BT878 module customization (.. was: Critical
> points about ...)
>
>> Uwe Bugla wrote:
>>
>>> Hi Manu,
>>>
>>> But it would be an acceptable compromise FOR NOW, wouldn
: Re: [linux-dvb] DST/BT878 module customization (.. was: Critical
points about ...)
> Uwe Bugla wrote:
>
> > Hi Manu,
> >
> > But it would be an acceptable compromise FOR NOW, wouldn't it?
>
>
> The reason is i do not wish to make changes to it, till i
On 5/3/07, Manu Abraham <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Uwe Bugla wrote:
> Hi Manu,
>
> But it would be an acceptable compromise FOR NOW, wouldn't it?
The reason is i do not wish to make changes to it, till i can fix it. It
is indeed hard to fix things that support a lot of devices, with
different
Uwe Bugla wrote:
> Hi Manu,
>
> But it would be an acceptable compromise FOR NOW, wouldn't it?
The reason is i do not wish to make changes to it, till i can fix it. It
is indeed hard to fix things that support a lot of devices, with
different issues. There are enough of issues in there.
You
Original-Nachricht
Datum: Thu, 03 May 2007 18:44:36 +0400
Von: Manu Abraham <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
An: Uwe Bugla <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
CC: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Betreff: Re: [linux-dvb] DST/BT878 module customization (.. was: Critical
points
Uwe Bugla wrote:
> On the technical layer I noticed that I heard some Pinnacle relais click
> during testing, but there were some i2c_bus symbols missing during
> compilation. So I guess those missing symbols are responsible for getting
> neither picture nor sound.
Can you send your compile
Original-Nachricht
Datum: Wed, 02 May 2007 20:45:58 +0400
Von: Manu Abraham <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
An: Uwe Bugla <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
CC: [EMAIL PROTECTED], linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Betreff: Re: [linux-dvb] DST/BT878 module customization (.. was: Critical
points
Original-Nachricht
Datum: Wed, 02 May 2007 20:45:58 +0400
Von: Manu Abraham [EMAIL PROTECTED]
An: Uwe Bugla [EMAIL PROTECTED]
CC: [EMAIL PROTECTED], linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Betreff: Re: [linux-dvb] DST/BT878 module customization (.. was: Critical
pointsabout
Uwe Bugla wrote:
On the technical layer I noticed that I heard some Pinnacle relais click
during testing, but there were some i2c_bus symbols missing during
compilation. So I guess those missing symbols are responsible for getting
neither picture nor sound.
Can you send your compile
Original-Nachricht
Datum: Thu, 03 May 2007 18:44:36 +0400
Von: Manu Abraham [EMAIL PROTECTED]
An: Uwe Bugla [EMAIL PROTECTED]
CC: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Betreff: Re: [linux-dvb] DST/BT878 module customization (.. was: Critical
pointsabout
Uwe Bugla wrote:
Hi Manu,
But it would be an acceptable compromise FOR NOW, wouldn't it?
The reason is i do not wish to make changes to it, till i can fix it. It
is indeed hard to fix things that support a lot of devices, with
different issues. There are enough of issues in there.
You can
On 5/3/07, Manu Abraham [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Uwe Bugla wrote:
Hi Manu,
But it would be an acceptable compromise FOR NOW, wouldn't it?
The reason is i do not wish to make changes to it, till i can fix it. It
is indeed hard to fix things that support a lot of devices, with
different
] DST/BT878 module customization (.. was: Critical
pointsabout ...)
Uwe Bugla wrote:
Hi Manu,
But it would be an acceptable compromise FOR NOW, wouldn't it?
The reason is i do not wish to make changes to it, till i can fix it. It
is indeed hard to fix things that support
]
Betreff: Re: [linux-dvb] DST/BT878 module customization (.. was: Critical
points about ...)
Uwe Bugla wrote:
Hi Manu,
But it would be an acceptable compromise FOR NOW, wouldn't it?
The reason is i do not wish to make changes to it, till i can fix it. It
is indeed hard to fix things
Markus Rechberger wrote:
Manu,
to me it looks like your attitude is not acceptable here, I sent
several mails already which you just use to ignore.
You very well know the reason why i am ignoring your mails. You just
tend to flame people for nothing. I tend to ignore the flamers.
If you
]
Betreff: Re: [linux-dvb] DST/BT878 module customization (.. was: Critical
points about ...)
On 5/3/07, Manu Abraham [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Uwe Bugla wrote:
Hi Manu,
But it would be an acceptable compromise FOR NOW, wouldn't it?
The reason is i do not wish to make changes
Manu Abraham wrote:
Uwe Bugla wrote:
If you download the thing as tar.bz2 you get a zero file down.
I think could be a bug in hgweb probably.
[snip]
Let me see why hgweb gives a zero length archive
Manu,
We reported this bug to the selenic guys quite a long time ago... You
Michael Krufky wrote:
Manu Abraham wrote:
Uwe Bugla wrote:
If you download the thing as tar.bz2 you get a zero file down.
I think could be a bug in hgweb probably.
[snip]
Let me see why hgweb gives a zero length archive
Manu,
We reported this bug to the selenic guys quite a
On 5/3/07, Manu Abraham [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Markus Rechberger wrote:
Manu,
to me it looks like your attitude is not acceptable here, I sent
several mails already which you just use to ignore.
You very well know the reason why i am ignoring your mails. You just
tend to flame people
Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote:
Enough. Let's stop arguing non technical issues.
If either one of you have any technical argue against the Trent's
patches, please point where the fix is wrong. Otherwise, if you wish,
you may send an acked-by agreeing with the fix.
Why don't you stop this
On 5/3/07, VDR User [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
STOP FIGHTING ALL THE DAMN TIME! From an outsiders perspective there
is a lot of unnecessary childish behavior going on at the expense of
good ideas and coding. It seems as though the Markus/Mauro team will
go against anything Manu says simply
On 5/3/07, Manu Abraham [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote:
Enough. Let's stop arguing non technical issues.
If either one of you have any technical argue against the Trent's
patches, please point where the fix is wrong. Otherwise, if you wish,
you may send an acked-by
Markus Rechberger wrote:
On 5/3/07, Manu Abraham [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote:
Enough. Let's stop arguing non technical issues.
If either one of you have any technical argue against the Trent's
patches, please point where the fix is wrong. Otherwise, if you wish,
On 5/3/07, Manu Abraham [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Markus Rechberger wrote:
On 5/3/07, Manu Abraham [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote:
Enough. Let's stop arguing non technical issues.
If either one of you have any technical argue against the Trent's
patches, please
Markus Rechberger wrote:
I mean the mail from Helge Hafting (thread [linux-dvb] Critical
points about kernel 2.6.21 and pseudo-authorities) at the very first
beginning.
I am replying to this mail, just because someone's spreading lies all
around.
On the mentioned thread, what i wrote (and
On 5/4/07, Manu Abraham [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Markus Rechberger wrote:
I mean the mail from Helge Hafting (thread [linux-dvb] Critical
points about kernel 2.6.21 and pseudo-authorities) at the very first
beginning.
I am replying to this mail, just because someone's spreading lies all
Original-Nachricht
Datum: Fri, 4 May 2007 00:06:51 +0200
Von: Markus Rechberger [EMAIL PROTECTED]
An: Manu Abraham [EMAIL PROTECTED]
CC: [EMAIL PROTECTED], linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Betreff: Re: [linux-dvb] DST/BT878 module customization (.. was: Critical
points about
Am Freitag, den 04.05.2007, 02:31 +0400 schrieb Manu Abraham:
Markus Rechberger wrote:
I mean the mail from Helge Hafting (thread [linux-dvb] Critical
points about kernel 2.6.21 and pseudo-authorities) at the very first
beginning.
I am replying to this mail, just because someone's
Original-Nachricht
Datum: Fri, 04 May 2007 02:31:49 +0400
Von: Manu Abraham [EMAIL PROTECTED]
An: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
CC: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Betreff: Re: [linux-dvb] DST/BT878 module customization (.. was: Critical
points about ...)
Markus Rechberger wrote
OTECTED]>, Linux Kernel Mailing list
, [EMAIL PROTECTED], Jan
Engelhardt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED], Linux DVB <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Betreff: Re: [linux-dvb] DST/BT878 module customization (.. was:
Criticalpoints about ...)
>
>>
L PROTECTED], Jan Engelhardt <[EMAIL
> PROTECTED]>, [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], Linux DVB <[EMAIL
> PROTECTED]>
> Betreff: Re: [linux-dvb] DST/BT878 module customization (.. was: Critical
> points about ...)
>
>> Trent Piepho wrote:
>>> On Tue, 1
L PROTECTED], Jan Engelhardt <[EMAIL
> PROTECTED]>, [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], Linux DVB <[EMAIL
> PROTECTED]>
> Betreff: Re: [linux-dvb] DST/BT878 module customization (.. was: Critical
> points about ...)
>
>> Trent Piepho wrote:
>>> On Tue, 1
D]>, [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], Linux DVB <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Betreff: Re: [linux-dvb] DST/BT878 module customization (.. was: Critical
points about ...)
> Trent Piepho wrote:
> > On Tue, 1 May 2007, Simon Arlott wrote:
> >> On 30/04/07 22:17, Markus Rechb
Trent Piepho wrote:
> On Tue, 1 May 2007, Simon Arlott wrote:
>> On 30/04/07 22:17, Markus Rechberger wrote:
>>> From my side I do not see any problem with that patch, if someone else
>>> has a problem with it please state out the reason.
>> I have no problem with the patch since it has nothing to
Trent Piepho wrote:
On Tue, 1 May 2007, Simon Arlott wrote:
On 30/04/07 22:17, Markus Rechberger wrote:
From my side I do not see any problem with that patch, if someone else
has a problem with it please state out the reason.
I have no problem with the patch since it has nothing to do with my
], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], Linux DVB [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Betreff: Re: [linux-dvb] DST/BT878 module customization (.. was: Critical
points about ...)
Trent Piepho wrote:
On Tue, 1 May 2007, Simon Arlott wrote:
On 30/04/07 22:17, Markus Rechberger wrote:
From my side I do not see
[EMAIL
PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], Linux DVB [EMAIL
PROTECTED]
Betreff: Re: [linux-dvb] DST/BT878 module customization (.. was: Critical
points about ...)
Trent Piepho wrote:
On Tue, 1 May 2007, Simon Arlott wrote:
On 30/04/07 22:17, Markus Rechberger wrote
[EMAIL
PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], Linux DVB [EMAIL
PROTECTED]
Betreff: Re: [linux-dvb] DST/BT878 module customization (.. was: Critical
points about ...)
Trent Piepho wrote:
On Tue, 1 May 2007, Simon Arlott wrote:
On 30/04/07 22:17, Markus Rechberger wrote
@vger.kernel.org, [EMAIL PROTECTED], Jan
Engelhardt [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED], Linux DVB [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Betreff: Re: [linux-dvb] DST/BT878 module customization (.. was:
Criticalpoints about ...)
Trent Piepho wrote:
On Tue, 1 May 2007, Simon Arlott wrote
On Tue, 1 May 2007, Simon Arlott wrote:
> On 30/04/07 22:17, Markus Rechberger wrote:
> > From my side I do not see any problem with that patch, if someone else
> > has a problem with it please state out the reason.
>
> I have no problem with the patch since it has nothing to do with my DVB
> card
Engelhardt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, [EMAIL
PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Betreff: Re: [linux-dvb] DST/BT878 module customization (.. was: Critical
points about ...)
> On 5/1/07, Simon Arlott <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On 30/04/07 22:17, Markus Rechberger wr
On 5/1/07, Simon Arlott <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 30/04/07 22:17, Markus Rechberger wrote:
> Trent Piepho wrote another patch for it, it just completes Uwe's patch
> in the end.
> From my side I do not see any problem with that patch, if someone else
> has a problem with it please state out
On 30/04/07 22:17, Markus Rechberger wrote:
Trent Piepho wrote another patch for it, it just completes Uwe's patch
in the end.
From my side I do not see any problem with that patch, if someone else
has a problem with it please state out the reason.
I have no problem with the patch since it has
On 30/04/07 22:17, Markus Rechberger wrote:
Trent Piepho wrote another patch for it, it just completes Uwe's patch
in the end.
From my side I do not see any problem with that patch, if someone else
has a problem with it please state out the reason.
I have no problem with the patch since it has
On 5/1/07, Simon Arlott [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 30/04/07 22:17, Markus Rechberger wrote:
Trent Piepho wrote another patch for it, it just completes Uwe's patch
in the end.
From my side I do not see any problem with that patch, if someone else
has a problem with it please state out the
PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Betreff: Re: [linux-dvb] DST/BT878 module customization (.. was: Critical
points about ...)
On 5/1/07, Simon Arlott [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 30/04/07 22:17, Markus Rechberger wrote:
Trent Piepho wrote another patch for it, it just completes Uwe's patch
On Tue, 1 May 2007, Simon Arlott wrote:
On 30/04/07 22:17, Markus Rechberger wrote:
From my side I do not see any problem with that patch, if someone else
has a problem with it please state out the reason.
I have no problem with the patch since it has nothing to do with my DVB
card but
80 matches
Mail list logo
