Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
On Friday, 29 June 2007 09:54, David Greaves wrote:
David Chinner wrote:
On Fri, Jun 29, 2007 at 08:40:00AM +0100, David Greaves wrote:
What happens if a filesystem is frozen and I hibernate?
Will it be thawed when I resume?
If you froze it yourself, then you'll have
On Friday, 29 June 2007 09:54, David Greaves wrote:
> David Chinner wrote:
> > On Fri, Jun 29, 2007 at 08:40:00AM +0100, David Greaves wrote:
> >> What happens if a filesystem is frozen and I hibernate?
> >> Will it be thawed when I resume?
> >
> > If you froze it yourself, then you'll have to tha
David Chinner wrote:
On Fri, Jun 29, 2007 at 08:40:00AM +0100, David Greaves wrote:
What happens if a filesystem is frozen and I hibernate?
Will it be thawed when I resume?
If you froze it yourself, then you'll have to thaw it yourself.
So hibernate will not attempt to re-freeze a frozen fs
On Fri, Jun 29, 2007 at 08:40:00AM +0100, David Greaves wrote:
> What happens if a filesystem is frozen and I hibernate?
> Will it be thawed when I resume?
If you froze it yourself, then you'll have to thaw it yourself.
Cheers,
Dave.
--
Dave Chinner
Principal Engineer
SGI Australian Software Gr
David Chinner wrote:
On Fri, Jun 29, 2007 at 12:16:44AM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
There are two solutions possible, IMO. One would be to make these workqueues
freezable, which is possible, but hacky and Oleg didn't like that very much.
The second would be to freeze XFS from within the hib
On Fri, Jun 29, 2007 at 12:16:44AM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> There are two solutions possible, IMO. One would be to make these workqueues
> freezable, which is possible, but hacky and Oleg didn't like that very much.
> The second would be to freeze XFS from within the hibernation code path
On Wed, Jun 27, 2007 at 08:49:24PM +, Pavel Machek wrote:
> Hi!
>
> > FWIW, I'm on record stating that "sync" is not sufficient to quiesce an XFS
> > filesystem for a suspend/resume to work safely and have argued that the only
>
> Hmm, so XFS writes to disk even when its threads are frozen?
On Friday, 29 June 2007 00:00, Pavel Machek wrote:
> On Thu 2007-06-28 17:27:34, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > On Wednesday, 27 June 2007 22:49, Pavel Machek wrote:
> > > Hi!
> > >
> > > > FWIW, I'm on record stating that "sync" is not sufficient to quiesce an
> > > > XFS
> > > > filesystem for a
On Thu 2007-06-28 17:27:34, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> On Wednesday, 27 June 2007 22:49, Pavel Machek wrote:
> > Hi!
> >
> > > FWIW, I'm on record stating that "sync" is not sufficient to quiesce an
> > > XFS
> > > filesystem for a suspend/resume to work safely and have argued that the
> > > onl
On Wednesday, 27 June 2007 22:49, Pavel Machek wrote:
> Hi!
>
> > FWIW, I'm on record stating that "sync" is not sufficient to quiesce an XFS
> > filesystem for a suspend/resume to work safely and have argued that the only
>
> Hmm, so XFS writes to disk even when its threads are frozen?
>
> > sa
Hi!
> FWIW, I'm on record stating that "sync" is not sufficient to quiesce an XFS
> filesystem for a suspend/resume to work safely and have argued that the only
Hmm, so XFS writes to disk even when its threads are frozen?
> safe thing to do is freeze the filesystem before suspend and thaw it aft
OK, just an quick ack
When I resumed tonight (having done a freeze/thaw over the suspend) some libata
errors threw up during the resume and there was an eventual hard hang. Maybe I
spoke to soon?
I'm going to have to do some more testing...
David Chinner wrote:
On Mon, Jun 18, 2007 at 08:49
On Mon, Jun 18, 2007 at 08:49:34AM +0100, David Greaves wrote:
> David Greaves wrote:
> >OK, that gave me an idea.
> >
> >Freeze the filesystem
> >md5sum the lvm
> >hibernate
> >resume
> >md5sum the lvm
>
> >So the lvm and below looks OK...
> >
> >I'll see how it behaves now the filesystem has bee
David Greaves wrote:
David Robinson wrote:
David Greaves wrote:
This isn't a regression.
I was seeing these problems on 2.6.21 (but 22 was in -rc so I waited
to try it).
I tried 2.6.22-rc4 (with Tejun's patches) to see if it had improved -
no.
Note this is a different (desktop) machine to
David Robinson wrote:
David Greaves wrote:
This isn't a regression.
I was seeing these problems on 2.6.21 (but 22 was in -rc so I waited
to try it).
I tried 2.6.22-rc4 (with Tejun's patches) to see if it had improved - no.
Note this is a different (desktop) machine to that involved my recent
David Greaves wrote:
This isn't a regression.
I was seeing these problems on 2.6.21 (but 22 was in -rc so I waited to
try it).
I tried 2.6.22-rc4 (with Tejun's patches) to see if it had improved - no.
Note this is a different (desktop) machine to that involved my recent bugs.
The machine wil
16 matches
Mail list logo
