On Wed, 16 May 2001, Heinz J. Mauelshagen wrote:
> Linus, Alan et al.: maybe you could think about it again and
> accept one larger LVM patch. Thanks.
I'm all for it right now. I'm running LVM on practically all my
machines and would really like to have the latest bugfixes
On Sun, May 13, 2001 at 08:48:19PM -0300, Rik van Riel wrote:
> On Fri, 11 May 2001, Steven Lembark wrote:
>
> > for my part running the system i'd rather have the "production"
> > LVM and kernel releases in sync and not have to worry about it.
> > if i need a beta/inter-version release then
On Sun, May 13, 2001 at 08:48:19PM -0300, Rik van Riel wrote:
On Fri, 11 May 2001, Steven Lembark wrote:
for my part running the system i'd rather have the production
LVM and kernel releases in sync and not have to worry about it.
if i need a beta/inter-version release then i'll deal
On Wed, 16 May 2001, Heinz J. Mauelshagen wrote:
Linus, Alan et al.: maybe you could think about it again and
accept one larger LVM patch. Thanks.
I'm all for it right now. I'm running LVM on practically all my
machines and would really like to have the latest bugfixes in
4 matches
Mail list logo
