Re: [linux-pm] Re: [PATH 1/1] Kexec jump - v2 - kexec jump

2007-08-22 Thread Huang, Ying
On Tue, 2007-08-21 at 12:14 +0200, Pavel Machek wrote: > Ok, I got it to work -- thanks a lot. > > Yes, acpi=off is mandatory. Unfortunately, thinkpad x60 does not boot > with acpi=off (should we add another test to linux firmware kit? > Machines should still boot in acpi=off mode...). acpi=off

Re: [linux-pm] Re: [PATH 1/1] Kexec jump - v2 - kexec jump

2007-08-22 Thread Huang, Ying
On Tue, 2007-08-21 at 12:14 +0200, Pavel Machek wrote: Ok, I got it to work -- thanks a lot. Yes, acpi=off is mandatory. Unfortunately, thinkpad x60 does not boot with acpi=off (should we add another test to linux firmware kit? Machines should still boot in acpi=off mode...). acpi=off noapic

Re: [linux-pm] Re: [PATH 1/1] Kexec jump - v2 - kexec jump

2007-08-21 Thread Pavel Machek
Hi! > On Thu, 2007-08-16 at 12:26 +0200, Pavel Machek wrote: > > Ping... is there some next version? > > > > I'm stuck at the tools side currently. kexec-1.101 just won't load the > > kernel properly, and kexec-testing from git does not know -j option. I > > tried hand-patching it, but got lots

Re: [linux-pm] Re: [PATH 1/1] Kexec jump - v2 - kexec jump

2007-08-21 Thread Pavel Machek
Hi! On Thu, 2007-08-16 at 12:26 +0200, Pavel Machek wrote: Ping... is there some next version? I'm stuck at the tools side currently. kexec-1.101 just won't load the kernel properly, and kexec-testing from git does not know -j option. I tried hand-patching it, but got lots of scary

Re: [linux-pm] Re: [PATH 1/1] Kexec jump - v2 - kexec jump

2007-08-17 Thread Huang, Ying
Hi, Pavel, On Thu, 2007-08-16 at 12:26 +0200, Pavel Machek wrote: > Ping... is there some next version? > > I'm stuck at the tools side currently. kexec-1.101 just won't load the > kernel properly, and kexec-testing from git does not know -j option. I > tried hand-patching it, but got lots of

Re: [linux-pm] Re: [PATH 1/1] Kexec jump - v2 - kexec jump

2007-08-17 Thread Huang, Ying
Hi, Pavel, On Thu, 2007-08-16 at 12:26 +0200, Pavel Machek wrote: Ping... is there some next version? I'm stuck at the tools side currently. kexec-1.101 just won't load the kernel properly, and kexec-testing from git does not know -j option. I tried hand-patching it, but got lots of scary

Re: [linux-pm] Re: [PATH 1/1] Kexec jump - v2 - kexec jump

2007-08-16 Thread Pavel Machek
Hi! > > > +int kexec_flags; > > > + > > > +static unsigned long kexec_jump_buf_pfn; > > > + > > > +static int __init parse_kexec_jump_buf_pfn(char *arg) > > > +{ > > > + if (!arg) > > > + return -EINVAL; > > > + > > > + kexec_jump_buf_pfn = memparse(arg, ); > > > + kexec_flags |=

Re: [linux-pm] Re: [PATH 1/1] Kexec jump - v2 - kexec jump

2007-08-16 Thread Pavel Machek
Hi! +int kexec_flags; + +static unsigned long kexec_jump_buf_pfn; + +static int __init parse_kexec_jump_buf_pfn(char *arg) +{ + if (!arg) + return -EINVAL; + + kexec_jump_buf_pfn = memparse(arg, arg); + kexec_flags |= KEXEC_FLAGS_IS_KEXECED_KERNEL; +