Re: [linux-pm] Re: Unify arch/x86/kernel/acpi/sleep*.c

* Rafael J. Wysocki <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Monday, 7 of January 2008, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > > On Monday, 7 of January 2008, Pavel Machek wrote: > > > Unify arch/x86/kernel/acpi/sleep*.c > > > > > > Pretty trivial unification; when two functions differed, it was > > > usually in

Re: [linux-pm] Re: Unify arch/x86/kernel/acpi/sleep*.c

* Rafael J. Wysocki [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Monday, 7 of January 2008, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: On Monday, 7 of January 2008, Pavel Machek wrote: Unify arch/x86/kernel/acpi/sleep*.c Pretty trivial unification; when two functions differed, it was usually in error handling, and

Re: [linux-pm] Re: Unify arch/x86/kernel/acpi/sleep*.c

On Monday, 7 of January 2008, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > On Monday, 7 of January 2008, Pavel Machek wrote: > > Unify arch/x86/kernel/acpi/sleep*.c > > > > Pretty trivial unification; when two functions differed, it was > > usually in error handling, and better of the two was picked up. > > > >

Re: [linux-pm] Re: Unify arch/x86/kernel/acpi/sleep*.c

On Monday, 7 of January 2008, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: On Monday, 7 of January 2008, Pavel Machek wrote: Unify arch/x86/kernel/acpi/sleep*.c Pretty trivial unification; when two functions differed, it was usually in error handling, and better of the two was picked up. Signed-off-by: