Re: [linux-sunxi] Re: [PATCH v3 1/5] i2c: mv64xxx: Add reset deassert call

2014-03-07 Thread Maxime Ripard
Hi, On Fri, Mar 07, 2014 at 12:18:58PM +0100, Wolfram Sang wrote: > > > > Since RESET_CONTROLLER is not required for those platforms, it really > > > should be optional - and I think the real fix is for the reset controller > > > support to provide stub functions. > > > > Philipp Zabel suggested

Re: [linux-sunxi] Re: [PATCH v3 1/5] i2c: mv64xxx: Add reset deassert call

2014-03-07 Thread Wolfram Sang
> > Since RESET_CONTROLLER is not required for those platforms, it really > > should be optional - and I think the real fix is for the reset controller > > support to provide stub functions. > > Philipp Zabel suggested that adding a _optional variant that provides stubs > and doesn't depend on RE

Re: [linux-sunxi] Re: [PATCH v3 1/5] i2c: mv64xxx: Add reset deassert call

2014-03-07 Thread Chen-Yu Tsai
On Fri, Mar 7, 2014 at 6:34 PM, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote: > On Fri, Mar 07, 2014 at 11:07:51AM +0100, Maxime Ripard wrote: >> Hi Russell, >> >> On Fri, Mar 07, 2014 at 09:52:23AM +, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote: >> > On Tue, Mar 04, 2014 at 05:28:37PM +0100, Maxime Ripard wrote: >> > >