Re: [linux-usb-devel] [PATCH 3/4] usb: allocated usb releated dma buffer with?kmalloc_node

Am Dienstag, 3. Juli 2007 schrieb Greg KH: > > > Ok, so two drivers might need this, but not the whole usb core, right? > > > > If those two drivers need the extended allocator, why not use it where > > it is beneficial, even if the benefit is small? > > What is the benefit?  Speed isn't an issue

Re: [linux-usb-devel] [PATCH 3/4] usb: allocated usb releated dma buffer with?kmalloc_node

On Tue, Jul 03, 2007 at 08:23:07AM +0200, Oliver Neukum wrote: > Am Dienstag, 3. Juli 2007 schrieb Greg KH: > > On Mon, Jul 02, 2007 at 10:33:12PM -0700, Yinghai Lu wrote: > > > On 7/2/07, Greg KH <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > On Mon, Jul 02, 2007 at 03:36:37PM -0700, Yinghai Lu wrote: > > >

Re: [linux-usb-devel] [PATCH 3/4] usb: allocated usb releated dma buffer with kmalloc_node

Am Dienstag, 3. Juli 2007 schrieb Greg KH: > On Mon, Jul 02, 2007 at 10:33:12PM -0700, Yinghai Lu wrote: > > On 7/2/07, Greg KH <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > On Mon, Jul 02, 2007 at 03:36:37PM -0700, Yinghai Lu wrote: > > > > [PATCH 3/4] usb: allocated usb releated dma buffer with kmalloc_node