On Thu, 07 Apr 2005 09:02:57 +1000
Benjamin Herrenschmidt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Interesting. Looks like pci_enable_wake(dev, state, 0) isn't
> > actually disabling wakeup on your hardware. (Assuming
> > CONFIG_USB_SUSPEND=n; if not, then it's odd that the system went
> > back to
On Wed, 6 Apr 2005 13:11:53 -0700
David Brownell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Interesting. Looks like pci_enable_wake(dev, state, 0) isn't actually
> disabling wakeup on your hardware. (Assuming CONFIG_USB_SUSPEND=n; if
> not, then it's odd that the system went back to sleep!)
Yes,
On Wed, 6 Apr 2005 13:11:53 -0700
David Brownell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Interesting. Looks like pci_enable_wake(dev, state, 0) isn't actually
disabling wakeup on your hardware. (Assuming CONFIG_USB_SUSPEND=n; if
not, then it's odd that the system went back to sleep!)
Yes,
On Thu, 07 Apr 2005 09:02:57 +1000
Benjamin Herrenschmidt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Interesting. Looks like pci_enable_wake(dev, state, 0) isn't
actually disabling wakeup on your hardware. (Assuming
CONFIG_USB_SUSPEND=n; if not, then it's odd that the system went
back to sleep!) Do you
On Wednesday 06 April 2005 4:50 pm, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
> On Wed, 2005-04-06 at 16:28 -0700, David Brownell wrote:
> > On Wednesday 06 April 2005 4:02 pm, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
> > >
> > > > Thanks for the testing update. I'm glad to know that there seems to
> > > > be only one
On Wed, 2005-04-06 at 16:28 -0700, David Brownell wrote:
> On Wednesday 06 April 2005 4:02 pm, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
> >
> > > Thanks for the testing update. I'm glad to know that there seems to
> > > be only one (minor) glitch that's PPC-specific!
> >
> > Which is just an
On Wednesday 06 April 2005 4:02 pm, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
>
> > Thanks for the testing update. I'm glad to know that there seems to
> > be only one (minor) glitch that's PPC-specific!
>
> Which is just an off-the-shelves NEC EHCI chip.
The wakeup-after-suspend hasn't been reported by
> Interesting. Looks like pci_enable_wake(dev, state, 0) isn't actually
> disabling wakeup on your hardware. (Assuming CONFIG_USB_SUSPEND=n; if
> not, then it's odd that the system went back to sleep!) Do you think
> that might be related to those calls manipulating the Apple ASICs being
> in
On Wednesday 06 April 2005 10:20 am, Colin Leroy wrote:
> On 05 Apr 2005 at 13h04, David Brownell wrote:
> > >
> > > What kind of work on these is needed so that they get in?
> >
> > Briefly, given 2.6.12-rc2 plus the patches mentioned above,
> > find out what else is needed.
> > ...
> > How's
On 05 Apr 2005 at 13h04, David Brownell wrote:
Hi,
> > There are known issues with USB after suspend/resume (D3 hot) on
> > powerpc.
>
> Also known fixes to some of them, which haven't yet been merged.
> I'll repost these as followups to this message, to linux-usb-devel
> and CC Colin.
On 05 Apr 2005 at 13h04, David Brownell wrote:
Hi,
There are known issues with USB after suspend/resume (D3 hot) on
powerpc.
Also known fixes to some of them, which haven't yet been merged.
I'll repost these as followups to this message, to linux-usb-devel
and CC Colin. They're in the
On Wednesday 06 April 2005 10:20 am, Colin Leroy wrote:
On 05 Apr 2005 at 13h04, David Brownell wrote:
What kind of work on these is needed so that they get in?
Briefly, given 2.6.12-rc2 plus the patches mentioned above,
find out what else is needed.
...
How's that sound?
Interesting. Looks like pci_enable_wake(dev, state, 0) isn't actually
disabling wakeup on your hardware. (Assuming CONFIG_USB_SUSPEND=n; if
not, then it's odd that the system went back to sleep!) Do you think
that might be related to those calls manipulating the Apple ASICs being
in the
On Wednesday 06 April 2005 4:02 pm, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
Thanks for the testing update. I'm glad to know that there seems to
be only one (minor) glitch that's PPC-specific!
Which is just an off-the-shelves NEC EHCI chip.
The wakeup-after-suspend hasn't been reported by anyone
On Wed, 2005-04-06 at 16:28 -0700, David Brownell wrote:
On Wednesday 06 April 2005 4:02 pm, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
Thanks for the testing update. I'm glad to know that there seems to
be only one (minor) glitch that's PPC-specific!
Which is just an off-the-shelves NEC EHCI
On Wednesday 06 April 2005 4:50 pm, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
On Wed, 2005-04-06 at 16:28 -0700, David Brownell wrote:
On Wednesday 06 April 2005 4:02 pm, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
Thanks for the testing update. I'm glad to know that there seems to
be only one (minor)
On Tuesday 05 April 2005 11:44 am, Colin Leroy wrote:
> Hi,
>
> There are known issues with USB after suspend/resume (D3 hot) on
> powerpc.
Also known fixes to some of them, which haven't yet been merged.
I'll repost these as followups to this message, to linux-usb-devel
and CC Colin. They're
On Tuesday 05 April 2005 11:44 am, Colin Leroy wrote:
Hi,
There are known issues with USB after suspend/resume (D3 hot) on
powerpc.
Also known fixes to some of them, which haven't yet been merged.
I'll repost these as followups to this message, to linux-usb-devel
and CC Colin. They're in
18 matches
Mail list logo
