>Agreed. The only thing I was thinking, was if the kernel is doing the
>right thing now, it shouldn't be forced to work around a bug in XFree.
>By not "fixing" the kernel, the XFree team would be forced to do the
>right thing.
Ha Ha Ha. That is funny. Okay it does get fixed many many months lat
On Thu, 12 Apr 2001, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Of course, but if we can fix the problem by making the kernel smaller,
> what possible motive could you have for opposing it other than 'but it
> doesn't solve _my_ problems!' ?
Agreed. The only thing I was thinking, was if the kernel is doing the
On Thu, Apr 12, 2001 at 09:28:44AM -0400, Chris Meadors wrote:
> On Thu, 12 Apr 2001, Rafael E. Herrera wrote:
> > If the problem occurs whithout the frame buffer on, the problem seems to
> > be on the X server.
>
> Exactly. That is what I'm saying. I've seen the problem with the
> returning to
3 matches
Mail list logo
